WP/33845/2026 of Junnu Sammaiah Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2026

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Government of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana.

2. The Municipal Commissioner, Kesamudram Municipality, Kesamudram, Mahabubabad District, Telangana

3. Naddunuri Nageshwar Rao, S/o. Galeeb, Aged about 45 years, Occ. Coolie, RJo. Ameenaapuram SC Colony, H/o- Kesamudram Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District.

4. Naddunuri Ashok, S/o. Sammaiah, Aged about 30 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Ameenaapuram SC Colony, H/o. Kesamudram Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District.

5. Naddunuri Sarangam, S/o. Sammaiah, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Agriculture, Rl/o. Ameenaapuram SC Colony, H/o. Kesamudram Village and Mandal, Mahabubabad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent Nos.1 and 2 arc nol considering and acting upon the petitioners representation dated 29-05-2026 complaining of the unauthorized construction being undertaken by respondent No.5 in the subject land admeasuring Ac.0-32 Gts, including the land in Sy.No.708/ 1, Kesamudram Mandal, Mahabubabad District, as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, and consequently direct respondent Nos.1 and 2 to consider the petitioners representation dated 29-05-2026 conducl an immediate site inspection of the subject property, verify whether respondent Nos.3 to 5 have obtained any valid municipal/build ing permission ancl sanctioned plan if no valid permission exists, or if the construction rs found to be in violation of the sanctioned permission/build ing laws, take appropriate action strictly in accordance with law, including stoppage of unauthorized construction maintain the existing physical features/status quo of the subject land admeasuring Ac.o-32 Gts pending consideration of the petitioners representation and pending adjudication of o.s.No.46 of 2020, without entering into or deciding the rival title/possession claims of the parties. LA. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct respondent Nos.3 to 5, their agents, servants, representatives or anybody claiming through them no to undertake any further construction or alter the existing physical features of the subject land admeasuring Ac.0-32 Gts, including Sy.No.70Bl l, Kesamudram Mandal, Mahabubabad District, and consequently direct respondent No.2 to ensure maintenance of status quo at the subject property, pending consideration of the petitioners representation dated 29-05-2026. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.VENKATESWARLU Counsel for the Respondent No.1: cP FOR MCPL AOMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REODy, SC FOR MpCL Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3 TO 5: - The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33845 OF 2026 CNR.No.HBHC010693 92026 Date:07.10.2026 Between: Jannu Sammaiah AND Petitioner The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Government of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana, and others. .. Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) Heard Mr. M. Venkateswarlu, learned counsel for the petitioner; and Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Municipalities, appearing for respondent No.2, and perused the material available on record

2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submitted that the representation dated 29.05.2026 submitted by the petitioner against respondent Nos.3 to 5, alleging unauthorised construction undertaken by them in Survey No.70B/1 , to an extent of Acs.0-32 guntas, situated in Kesamudram Mandal, Mahabubabad District, would be considered in accordance with law.

BVR,J !\'.t'.No.338,+5 2026

3. ln view of the aforesaid submission made by learned Standing Counsel, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 29.05.2026 submitted by the petitioner regardlng the alleged unauthorised construction undertaken by respondent Nos.3 to 5 in the aforesaid property, by issuing notice to the petitioner and respondent Nos.3 to 5 and by affording them an opportunity of personal hearing, and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. As this order is passed without entering into the merits of the case, notice to respondent Nos.3 to 5 is dispensed with. However, if respondent Nos.3 to 5 are in any aggrieved by this order, they are at liberty to approach this Court seeking modification of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/. K.V.O. NARSI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Government of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana. The Municipa Commissioner, Kesamudram l\,4unicipa ity, Kesimudram, Mahabubabad District, Telangana

3. One CC to SRI M.VENKATESWARLU, Advocate [OpUC]

4. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

5. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRTSHNA REDDY, SC FOR MPCL tOpUCl

6. Two CD Copies PSK. <a) TKS V.

CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 0711012026

ORDER

WP.No.33845 of 2026 9TATE qA t;/ { sg 0c1?s6 :)o.J ti ("- ..4

* i,l s DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. @ 1 ? 61 tc l16