Telangana High Court

WP/33973/2026 of Kannam Laxmana Muktheeswar, Vs The State of Telangana, on 7 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 33973 oF 2026 Between: Kannam Laxmana Muktheeswar, Sio Rajaiah, aged

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 33973 oF 2026

Between:

Kannam Laxmana Muktheeswar, Sio Rajaiah, aged about 36 years, Occ, Bussiness, R/o. H.No. 6-148, Main Road Bhupalpally, Jayshankar Bhupalpally, Telangana - 506169.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principle secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, Bhupalapally

3. The Jayashankaer Bhupalpally Municipality, rep. by its Commissioner, Near T2 Quarters, Beside Singareni General Manager Office Line, Bhupalpally Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, Telangana 506169.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in demarcation of the House bearing No. 6-'190, Main Road, Bhupalpally village for widening of road by changing the alignment of the existing road without properly measuring the boundaries and trying to demolish the petitioner,s property without following the procedure contemplated under law as illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper, violation of the Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of Constitution of lndia and violative of the Telangana Municipalities Act, 2019, violative of Principles of Natural Justice and violative of the Right to Fair Compensation, Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 201 3.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Hrgh Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including not to demohsh the Petitioner's house bearing H No 6-190, Main Road, Bhupalpally, Jayashankar Bhupalpally, Telangana - 506169, to an extent of 236 112 Sq Yards or 197 75 Sq Meters in Survey No.

398/A-8, situated at Bhupalpally, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District pending the disposal of the Writ Petition.

l.A. NO:2OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent authorities to consider the representation dated 05.10 2026 made by the petitioner, pending the disposal of the Writ Petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI CH.VENKAT RAMAN

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV

Counsel forthe Respondent No.2: GP FOR REVENUE

counsel forthe Respondent No.3: sRl PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COI]RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

ATHYDERABAD

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.33973 OF 2026

(CNR No.HBH C010699292026)

DATE:07.10.2026

Between:

Mr. Kannam Laxamana Muktheeswar

.. Petitioner

AND

The State ofTelangana,

Rep. by its Principal Secretary,

Municipal Administration and Urban

Development Department,

Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad & two others

.. Respondents

ORDER:(ORAL)

This writ petition is frled by the petitioner seeking to declare action of the respondents' authorities in demarcation of the house property bearing Municipal No.6-190, Main Road, Bhupalpally Village for widening of road by changing alignment of the eisting road without properly measuring the boundaries and trying to demolish the subject premises without following the procedure contemplated under law as illegal, arbitrary, in violation of the Telangana Municipalities Act 2019 and violative of principles of

BVR,J

wP_33973_2026

To,

natural justice and also the right to Fair compensation, Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabititation and Resettlement Act 2013.

2. Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, leamed Standing Counsel for Jayashankar Bhupalapally Municipality - respondent No.3 submiued that due process o1- law will be followed if any action is initiated against the subject premises of the petitioner in connection with widening of road abutting the subject premises.

3. Recording the afor.esaid submission of the leamed Standing counsel for respondent No.3, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage itself. It is made clear that if any action is to be initiated by respondent No.3 against the subject premises of the petitioner in connection with widening of road abutting the subject premises, due process of law shall be followed. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/- A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

1 . The principle- secretary,

- Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department. Secretariat Buildings, lyOeraOaJ -' - -

2. The District Collector, Jayashankar Bhupalpally District, Bhupalapally.

3. The Commissioner, Jayasharkaer

. Bhupalpally Municipality, Near T2

Quarters. Besrde Singaieli gelgral Mr";;;;'Office Line, Bhupatpaily Mandal, Jayashankar Bhupatpally District, TelailanJ soOt Og

4. One CC to SRt CH VENKAT RAMAN, Advocate tOpUCl 5 one CC to SRt PUTTA KRTSHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNtCtpALtTylOpUCl

6. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for The State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUT]

8. Two CD Copies

4hMK

TKS

HIGH COURT

CC TODAY

DATED: 0711012026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.No.33973 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS . ,.,-- jl A f€, ,} J Bs [H zuE ;.,y' @v, ! (;; -)_, :\

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead