WP/32142/2026 of Mittapally Srinivas Vs The State of Telangana on 7 October 2026

[ 31831 IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 32142 OF 2026 Between: Mittapally Srinivas, S/o Guruvaiah, Aged about 60 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Flat No.204, Vasavi Nilayam, Back side of Lotus School, Vasavi Nagar, Miryalaguda, Nalgonda District. ...PETITtONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner and Director, Municipal Administration and Urban Develpoment, AC Guards, HYderabad.

3. The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda.

4. The Miryalguda Municipality, Rep. by its Commissioner, Miryalguda, Nalgonda District.

5. Mr. Ambati Veerahanuman, S/o Venkatesham, Aged aboul.47 years, Occ. Business. Fl/o. Shop No 81 , NTR Municipal Complex, Miryalaguda Town, Nalgonda District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus aggrieved by inaction of respondent no.4 in not taking steps to evict respondent no.S who is in un-authorised occupation of Municipal shop no.81, NTR Municipal Complex, Miryalguda town, Nalgoda District, belonging to respondent no 4 Municipality, which was originally allotted to petitioner, despite representations dated 3olo3l2a25 and 0210412025 made by the petitioner by following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of petitioners rights guaranteed under Article 14 and 21 of constitution of lndia, against rhe Telangana public premises(Eviction of Un authorised occupants), Act 1968 and against all setfled principles of law and consequently direct the respondent no.4 authority to take steps to evict respondent no.5 who is in unauthorised occupation of Municipal shop no.g'r , NTR Municipal Complex, Miryatguda town, Nalgoda District, belonging to respondent no.4 Municipality, which was originally allotted to petitioner, vide representations dated 3010312025 and 0210412025 made by the petitioner. LA. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petiti,cn under section 15'1 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 authority to take steps. to evict respondent no.S who is in unauthorised occupation of Municipal shop no,B.1, NTR Municipal Complex, Miryalguda town, Nalgoda District, belonging to respondent no.4 [\/unicipality, which was originally allotted to petitioner, vide representations dated 3olo3l2o25 and 0210412025 made by the Petitioner. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SIRIpURAM KAUMUD Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: cp FOR MCPLADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2&4: SRI PUTTA KRTSHNA REDDy, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Gp FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.S: SRI K.V.SUBBA REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER

-- HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRTTPE TITION No.327AOF 2026 (CNR No.HBHC010551812026) DATE OF ORDER: 07'10'2026 Between: MittapallY Srinivas ...Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Represented by its Principal Secretary MuniciPal Administration and Urban DeveloPment DePartment Secretariat, HYderabad and others ...ResPondents ORDER: (ORAL) Heard Mr. Siripuram Kaumud' learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. Putta Krishna Reddy, Iearned Standing Cormsel for respondents No 2 and 4; Mr. K.V.Subba Reddy, Iearned counsel for respondent No'5; and perused the material on record

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is admittedly the alottee and ressee of the subiect property bearing Municipal shop No.8l,NTRMunicipalComplex'MiryalagudaTown'NalgondaDistrict'and subsequently, respondent No'5 was inducted in the subiect property by the petitioner. According to the learned counsel' the renE in respect of the subiect proPerty are continuously being paid by the petitioner'

.- To,

3. The said submission is rebutted by the learned counsel for respondent No.5. It is submitted that respondent No.5 had been directly payinll the renb to the Murucipalih..

4. However, learned Standing Counsel for respondents No.2 and 4 submitted drat the lease of the petitioner in respect of the subject property has come to an end long back and respondent No.5 is in unauthorized occupation of the subject property. The Municipality has decided to vacate respondent No.5 from the subject property and go for tender process.

5. ln view, of the aforesaid submissions, this writ petition is disposed of direcling respondent No.4 to take appropriate action against respondent No.5 in accordance with law and thereafter, allot the subject property by way of lease through public tenders. This exetcise shall be conducted by issuing notice to the petitioner and respondent No.5. Further, respondent No.4 is at liberty to recover dues, if any from the petitioner and respondent No.5 in respect of the subject propertv by following due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition, stand closed. SD/-M.NAGAMANI //TRUE C)pytt ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

ffi "?'#1?:l i;:ffi? #JJJ:ll€ I Ad m in istratio n a nd U rb a n Deve ro pment The Commissioner and Deverpoment, AC Guardi n?[Eiji';o "'icipal Administration and Urban The District Collector, Nalgonda District, Nalgonda. I:L,Yyflfliff. Municiparitv' Rep. ov 1,. -c*orrissioner, Miryarsuda, One CC to SRt SIRIpURAM KAUMUD, Advocate [OPUC]

4.

6. One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITYIOPUCI

7. One CC to SRI K.V.SUBBA REDDY, Advocate TOPUCI

8. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT]

9. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV' High Court for the State ofTelangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

10. Two CD Copies PMK/DA gx

HIGH COURT DATED: 0711012026

ORDER

WP.No.32142 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS d 16 ocT2m E *\ CC TODAY 1k,E SI'A * q * !.t =:-;s' (s o (

@ "b