Telangana High Court
WP/33379/2026 of Smt Dasari Uma Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 33379 0F 2026 Between: Smt Dasari Uma, Wo Dasari Anjaneyulu, Aged about 44
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 33379 0F 2026
Between:
Smt Dasari Uma, Wo Dasari Anjaneyulu, Aged about 44 years, Occ Housewife, R/o 3-104, Imampet, Nalgonda District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Telangana, rep by its Principal Secretary to the Government Department of Municipal Administration Urban Development Secretariat Hyderabad.
2. The Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.
3. The Dy Commissioner, Circle 15, Adibatla, GHMC, Hyderabad.
4. Nagaraju Paladi, S/o Prakash Paladi, Aged about 47 years, Occ;Self Employee, Fl/o H.No.5-731128 PloI No.128P and 129P Road No.6 Apple Avenue Colony Phase 2 lnjapur Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. .....RESPONDENTS Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned notice No UC-54/ADB/TPS/GHMC/2026 dt 191912026 issued by respondent no 3 in directing to demolish premises constructed in sy.No.142 lnjapur village Abdullapurmet Ranga Reddy District as bad in law arbitrary unjust and contrary to GHMC Act and consequently set aside the same'
l.A.NO:1 OF 2026 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no 3 not to take any coercive steps of removal of structures of the premises constructed in Sy No 142 lnjaput village Abdullapurmet Ranga Reddy District pursuant to impugned notice no 54|ADB/TPS/GHMC/2026 di 191912026 issued by respondent no 3 pending disposal of writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI SANJEEV REDDY GILLELA Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : c.P FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 3 : SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI, SC FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.4 : -- The Court made the following ORDER
IN THE HIGH COTIRT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETIToN No.33379 OF 2026 CNRNo.HBH c01068s912026 DATE: 06-10-2026 Between: Mrs. Dasari Uma ... Petitioner AND The State ofTelangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ... Respondents RDER: (oRAL) Heard Mr. Sanjeev Reddy Gillela, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Laxmaiah Kanchani, leamed standing counsel for GHMC, appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
2. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.3 passed order. vide Notice No.UC-54/ADB/TPS 1GIIN(C12OZ6 d,ated 19.09.2026 stating that petitioner is proceeding with unauthorized construction in the premises situated in Survey No.142 of Injapur Village, Abdullapurmet Mandal, Ranga Reddy
BVR,J W.P. No.33379 of 2026 District. It is further stated that show-cause notice dated 03.09 .2026 was issued to the petitioner, which was served on Mr. Dasari Anjanelulu, husband of the petitioner on 03'09'2026 with due acknowledgment and additional copy of the same was affixed on the petitioner's property' As no reply was submitted to the show-cause notice and no one attended the personal hearing' impugned order was Passed'
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that ground floor structure was existing on the subject property since several years. As petitioner made additional 1" and 2nd floors, show-cause notice was issued to her which was served on husband of the petitioner. Leamed standing counsel for GHMC submitted that only after shou-cause notice was issued, building permission application was submitted by the petitioner on 16'09'2026 in File No.077443/GHMC/18546/IABPlCl512026 through BuildNow portal under self certification. The application was processed and it was found that petitioner has not provided Land Regularization
BVR,J W.P. No.33379 of 2026 Proceedings (LRS) 2020 receipt as per Memo No.15230/PLG.IIV 2020 dated 20.12.2021. Petitioner was directed to submit above mentioned documents and explanation as to why provisional building permit order granted to him shall not be cancelled, vide shortfall letter v ide Notice No.07 7 443 I GI]JvlCl 18546/IABP/C I 5/ 2026 dated03.10.2026.
5. Leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that plot of the petitioner is 180 square yards and under the building regulations, she is entitled for Ground + two (2) upper floors.
6. A copy of shortfall letter dated 03.10.2026 is served on leamed counsel for the petitioner.
As admittedly 1" and 2nd floor have been unauthorizedly made by the petitioner, status quo, obtaining as on today, shall be maintained in respect of the structures standing on the subject property, until shortfall objections are complied with. Petitioner is directed to submit explanation to the shortfall letter dated 03.10.2026, within a period of ten (10) days from today the date of receipt ofa copy of this order. Until explanation of the petitioner
BVR,J W.P. No.33379 of 2026 ls considered, no coercive steps shatl be taken against the With the above observations, the writ petition is disposed of' There shall be no order as to costs' Asa sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed SD/- K.V.O. NARSI BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER petirioner. ll' Petitioner proceeds with further constmctlon, are at liberty to seal the unauthorized resPondent Nos'2 and 3 construction made on subject property' g. As this order is passed without entering into the merits' notice to respondent No'4 is dispensed with' If respondent No'4 is in any way aggrieved by this order' he is at liberty to approach this Court seeking modification of this order'
To of I\,4uniciPal Telangana at
The Principal Secretary to Government' Department ;; "I,,;;[; uioan oe'etopment Secretanat state of ?l3"LT,i*,rr,"ner, Greater Hyderabad 1r/unicipar corporation, Tank Bund Road HYderabad The Dy Commissioner, Circle 15, Adibatla, G-HMC,-Hyderabad' Two CC's to G.P FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPIVENT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)
5. One CC to SRI SANJEEV REDDY GILLELA, Advocate [OPUC]
6. One CC to SRI LAXMAIAH KANCHANI, SC FOR GHMC (OPUC)
7. Two CD Copies \\ SA TKS
C.C. TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 0611012026
ORDER
WP.No.33379 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. ;. \ t1. :l rl;u I a //,' . '.:) J,', tl \ 16 ocT 2C?[ ^\ !:s'r-':":r;' -i-:::::;t- -/ .,;/ fa$ .,I VT N rrr\*'