WP/32864/2026 of Alla Swaroopa Rani Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2026

: ORDER:

This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief Petitioners

".,.to lssue a Writ of Mandamus declanng the action of the ld Respondent in not considering and disposing the Appeal filed on 10.09.2026 along with stay p-etition againsi the orders passed by the Special . Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Eturunagaram tn case No.N90/LTNMGPT/2023 dated 24 11 2025 communicated unofficially on 18 08.2026 and directing the Tahs dar for conducting Panchanama for taking over the tands covered under the orders of Special Deputy Cotlector, Tribal Welfare, Eturunagaram, in the above LTR case is i egal, arbitrary, violates Atlicles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of Constitution of lndia and contrary to the Judgment rendered by the Hon'ble High Courl repotled n 2OO-S (5) ALD 126 and in W.A No.1162 of 2008' dated 30.10.2023, and consequentiatty direct the Respondents to dispose the Appeal atong with the stay petition without distuiOing lhe possesslon ofthe Petitioners and pass' '" Heard Mr. P.V.Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ananthula Ravinder, learned Government Pleader for Social Welfare appearing for respondent Nos,1 to 4 Perused the record.

3. When the matter rs taken up for hearing, learned counsel ror the petitioners submits that challenging the order, dated '24 11.2025 passed by respondent No.3, whereby the petitioners were ejected from the subject property i.e., land admeasuring Ac.0.3'l gts.. Ac. l.01 gts,, Ac.0.31 gts. and Ac.3.00 gts. in Sy Nos.232116, 232t19,232/1gtA and Z32t79tA respectivety and the same was ordered to be taken into the custody of the Government, the petitioners preferred an appeal before respondent No.2, along with a stay application on 0g 09 2026. However, respondent No.2 is not proceeding with the appeal. He further submits that there is a standing paddy crop in the subject property and the petitioners are apprehending dispossession. Therefore, learned counsel requested this Court to direct respondent No 2 to consider and dispose of the appeal within a stipulated time and arso requested this court to direct the respondents not to interfere with or dispossess the petitioners from the subject property, pending disposal ofthe appeal.

4. Learned Government pleader for Social Welfare appearing fo. respondent Nos. l to 4 reported no objection.

ln view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and considering that there is a standing paddy crop in the subject property, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, this Court, deems it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition, directing respondent No.2 to consider and dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioners on 08.09.2026 and pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Till the disposal of the appeal, the respondents shall not interfere with the subject property or dispossess the petitioners therefrom. b With the above directions, this Writ petition is disposed of No costs Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- A.H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To 'l . The Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Department' Dr' B R' Ambedkar Telangana Secretariat, State of Telangana at Hyderabad'

2. te -Additional Agent to the Government (Project Officer), ITDA, Eturunagaram, Mulugu District.

3. The Speiial Deputy Collector, Tribal Welfare, Eturunagaram, Mulugu District.

4. The Tahsildar, Mangapeta Mandal, Mulugu District.

5. Two CCs to GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana at HYderabad. [OUT]

6. One CC to SRI P.V.RAMANA' Advocate [OPUC]

7. Two CD Copies SA

C.C.TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 0611012026

ORDER

WP.No.32864 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. q .$ $ S\ o u- ,i o E ,o )i H l-t q ((f * LT