CRLP/14429/2026 of Subhash Kumar Baid Vs The State of Telangana on 6 October 2026

ORDER

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail who is arrayed as accused in connection with FIR No.501 of 2025 of Suraram Police Station, Cyberabad, alleged for the offence punishable under Section 64(1) of the BNS, 2023.

2. Heard Sri M.Keshav Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner- accused and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that material objects and documentary evidence relied upon by the prosecution is already collected by the Police. Petitioner-accused is innocent and he has not committed any offence, he is falsely implicated in the present case. Petitioner-accused is arrested on 06.08.2026 and he is produced before the concerned Magistrate, since then he is in judicial custody. Entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-accused on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the role played by the petitioner-accused is clearly depicted the remand case diary.

5. De facto complainant has lodged a report before P.S., Suraram on 04.09.2025. It is stated in the complaint that nine months back she is married with one Priyanshu Kumar Ram, which is a love marriage, after the marriage, couple came down to Hyderabad for their livelihood from her native place Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh and were residing in a rented house at Borabanda, Hyderabad. Her husband sells helmets and bike covers on the footpath at Borabanda. On 03.09.2025, Subhash came to her husband’s helmet shop and he informed that he had arranged a job for her as a security guard at Hitech City and that she has to attend for interview the next day and join immediately. On 04.09.2025, Subhash took her to OYO Sri Krishna Hotel near Mallareddy Hospital, booked a room in the hotel and subsequently committed sexual intercourse with her. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.

6. Petitioner-accused is arrested on 06.08.2026 and was remanded to judicial custody on the same day, since then he is in jail.

7. Remand case diary goes to show that respondent has altogether examined 13 witnesses, it appears from the record that major portion of the investigation is completed, detaining the petitioner-accused further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Hence, petitioner-accused is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the VIII Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Medchal. ii. The petitioner-accused shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight

(8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner-accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioner-accused shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses.

v. It is made clear that if any of the above conditions are violated, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.

8. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

__________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J

Date: 06.10.2026 pss

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.14429 of 2026 (CNR.No. HBHC010604512026) DATE: 06.10.2026

pss