Telangana High Court

WP/33577/2026 of Sri G Naveen Yadav Vs State of Telangana on 6 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 33577 OF 2026 Between: 1. Sri G Naveen Yadav, S/o. G. Eshwar Yadav, aged

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 33577 OF 2026

Between:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

1. Sri G Naveen Yadav, S/o. G. Eshwar Yadav, aged about 38 years Occ. employee, No.12-1-637, Yadav Basti Asif Nagar, Hyderabad-500028

2. Sri G. Srinivas Yadav, S/o. G. Eshwar Yadav, aged about 40 years Occ. employee, No.12-1-637, Yadav Basti Asif Nagar, Hyderabad-500028 ...PET]TIONERS AND

1. State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Hyderabad

3. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-13, Karwan, Golkonda Zone GHMC, Hyderabad.

4. The District Collector, Hyderabad district ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an Order, Direction or Writ and more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 and his officials in threatening to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the house property bearing No. 1 3-6-455/48/E/A, having PTIN No.'l 131303619, admeasuring 35 square yards, situated at Heera Nagar, Jafferguda, Hyderabad, without any authority of law, as illegal, arbitrary, high-handed [-qoEt-tE rE-, and violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the said property including not to disturb the existing use of the property in any manner, in the interest of justice. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pass an order directing respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the house property bearing No.13-6-455/48/E/A, having PTIN No.1131303619, admeasuring 35 square yards, situated at Heera Nagar, Jafferguda, Hyderabad including not to disturb the existing use of the property in any manner, pending the writ petition, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. G SURENDER Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel forthe Respondents No.2 & 3: STANDING COUNSEL FOR GHMC Counsel for the Respondent No.4: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA ATHYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITIO N No.33577 OF 2026 C.N.R.No. HBHCo10688812026 DATE OF ORDER: 06.70.2025 Between: G. Naveen Yadal' and another ..Petitioner AND The State of Telangana Represented by its Principal Secretary Municipat Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others ...Respondents ORDER: (ORAL) This writ petition is fited seeking to declare the action of respondent No.3 and his officials in threatening to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over the house property bearing No. 1 3-6-455l48/E/A, having PTIN No. 1 1 3 1 30361 9, admeasuring 35 square yards, situated at Heera Nagar, Jafferguda, Hyderabad, as arbitrary, illegal and unconstitutional.

2. Heard Mr. G. Surender, learned counsel for the petitioners; leamed Govemment Pleader for Municipal Administration and urban Development for respondent No.1, leamed Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3 and the learned Government Pleader :filrlIEqt !taa7

for Re', enue appearing lor respondent No.4 and perused the material on record

3. Learned Standing Counsel for GHMC appearing for respondent Nos.l anci I submitted that the petitioners ha','e not produced an).' title documents in support of their claim and that there is a serious dispute regarding their ori nership over the subject propertl'

4. Learned counsel tbr the petitioners submitted that structures have alread-v been constructed over the subject property as evident from Ex.P4- Photographs. He further submitted that the petitioners have purchased the subject property liom its previous owner, Sri N. Nagesh Yadav, under a registered Salc Deed bearing document No.4730 of 2024 dated 27.07.2(t24. The said property was assessed under House No. 13-6- :155,,18 Ir'A. har ing PTI\ No. I 13130i619, admeasuring 35 square yards, situatecl at Heera Nagar, Jafferguda, Hyderabad. He lurther contended that respondent Nt',.3 and his officials are intert'ering with the petitioners' possession and enjoyment of the sub.lect property. Prima facie, it appears fiom the material placed on record that the petitioners are in possession of the subject propcrty.

-aa--- J To, DAN

5. Having regard to the submissions made by both the respective parties, without entering into merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of direiting respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to interfere with the petitioners' possession and enjoyment of the subject property, without fotlowing due process of law. It is made clear that respondent No.3 is at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law for recovery of any property tax arrears due in respect of the subject property, after following the procedure prescribed by law. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition, stand closed SD/. A.H,S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER 'l . The Principal Secretary Municipal Adminiskation and Urban Development Oepartment, State of Telangana, Secretariat, Hyderabad'

2. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Hyderabad

3. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle-13, Karwan, Golkonda Zone GHMC' Hyderabad.

4. The District Collector, Hyderabad district

5. One CC to SRl. G SURENDER, Advocate [OPUC]

6. TwoCCstoGPFoRMCPLADMNURBANDEV,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT]

7. One CC to STANDING COUNSEL FOR GHMC IOPUC]

a. i*" c-c, to Gp FOR REVENUE, High court for the State of relangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

9. Two CD CoPies PVL

HIGH COURT DATED: 0611012026

ORDER

WP.No.33577 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS GC TODAY -i t.C SIArA: ( e o ,-)

c) 2U26 16 ocl a I * .D eS i tArC \7 (

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead