Telangana High Court
CRLP/15748/2026 of Mohammed Noor Shahed Vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA on 6 October 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.15748 and 15752 of 2026 CNR.No. HBHC010663272026 [Crl.P.No.15748 of 2026] CNR.No. HBHC010663232026 [Crl.P.No.15752 of 2026] DATE: 06.10.2026 BETWEEN: Mohammed Noor Shahed
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.15748 and 15752 of 2026
CNR.No. HBHC010663272026 [Crl.P.No.15748 of 2026]
CNR.No. HBHC010663232026 [Crl.P.No.15752 of 2026]
DATE: 06.10.2026
BETWEEN:
Mohammed Noor Shahed
… Petitioner-Accused No.1
in Crl.P.No.15748 of 2026
Wali Ahmed
… Petitioner – Accused No.2
in Crl.P.No.15752 of 2026
And
The State of Telangana
Represented by Public Prosecutor,
High Court of Telangana,
Hyderabad
… Respondent - Complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER
1. These memorandum of Criminal Petitions are filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners - A1 and A2 on bail in connection with Crime No.397 of 2026 of P.S. Balapur Police Station, Hyderabad District. The offences alleged against the petitioners – A1 and A2 are under Section 109 r/w Section 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS).
2. Heard Sri Ch.Rajkumar, learned counsel for the petitioners - A1 and A2 and Sri D.Arun Kumar learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent – State.
BRMR,J Crl.P.Nos.15748 & 15752 of 2026
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the investigation has substantially been progressed, the statements of the material witnesses have already been recorded and the alleged weapon has been seized. The injured Sri Abdul Fayaz was undergoing treatment at the time of the earlier bail proceedings and has substantially recovered and discharged from the hospital. There are material inconsistencies in the prosecution case with regard to the alleged date of occurrence and the identification of petitioners – A1 and A2. Petitioners – A1 and A2 are arrested and remanded to the judicial custody on 06.07.2026, since then they are in jail. Police has completed the investigation and prayed to enlarge the petitioners – A1 and A2 on bail.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the role played by the petitioners – A1 and A2 is depicted in the remand case diary. A2 bail application came to be dismissed by this Court on 10.09.2026 and prayed to dismiss the petitions.
5. Mohammed Omar Farooq has lodged a report before PS Balapur on 06.07.2026 stating that while his father Abdul Faiyaz and his mother were at home, his wife’s family members came to their house, argued with them and then left the place. Later his father-in-law and his nephew came back to the house with a knife and attacked his father Abdul Faiyaz and stabbed him on the chest
BRMR,J Crl.P.Nos.15748 & 15752 of 2026
and left side of his stomach with an intention to kill him. During the attack, A2-Wali Ahmed told A1-Noor Shahed to stab him again, as a result, Abdul Faiyaz suffered bleeding injury. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.
6. Petitioners – A1 and A2 were arrested on 06.07.2026 at 15.00 hours and remanded to judicial custody.
7. During the course of hearing, learned Additional Public Prosecutor has produced Medico Legal Record of LW2 – Abdul Fayaz which states that Fayaz has received grievous injury.
8. A2-Wali Ahmed has filed Crl.P.No.13425 of 2026 for grant of regular bail before this Court, the same came to be dismissed vide order dated 10.09.2026 with an observation that specific overt acts are attributed against him as the injured is still in hospital as inpatient.
9. Remand case diary goes to show that respondent has examined altogether 12 witnesses in support of the case. Since investigation is at the fag end, detaining the petitioners – A1 and A2 further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Therefore, the petitioners – A1 and A2 are entitled to be enlarged on bail subject to the following conditions:
BRMR,J Crl.P.Nos.15748 & 15752 of 2026
i. The petitioners – A1 and A2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class – cum – I Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar. ii. The petitioners – A1 and A2 shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10.00 a.m. to 05.00 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioners – A1 and A2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioners – A1 and A2 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses including the complainant. v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.
10. Accordingly, these Criminal Petitions are allowed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.
__________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 06.10.2026 Dua
BRMR,J Crl.P.Nos.15748 & 15752 of 2026
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.15748 and 15752 of 2026
DATE: 06.10.2026 Dua