Telangana High Court
FCA/135/2009 of T.SOMESWAR Vs T.NAGAMANI on 6 October 2026
THE STATE OF TELANGANA Main Case No.: FCA No.135 OF 2009 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. No. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 18.09.2026 KL,J & SKS,J e I.A.No.2 of 2026 This application is filed to condone the delay of 1399 days in filing the restoration petition against the judgment passed in FCA.No.135 of
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Main Case No.: FCA No.135 OF 2009
PROCEEDING SHEET
SL.
No.
DATE
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
18.09.2026
KL,J & SKS,J e
I.A.No.2 of 2026
This application is filed to condone the delay of 1399 days in filing the restoration petition against the judgment passed in FCA.No.135 of 2009.
Mr. J. Venudhar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions would submit that respondent is ready for obtaining decree of divorce.
Having satisfied with the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of this application, and considering the fact that the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent is matrimonial in nature, as well as the age of the petitioner, who is 69 years old, and the respondent, who is aged about 60 years, the delay of 1,399 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
Accordingly, this application is allowed.
SL. No. DATE
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
I.A.No.3 of 2026 This application is filed to set aside the order dated 06.04.2022 passed in F.C.A.No.135 of 2009 and to restore the Appeal.
In view of allowing I.A.No.2 of 2026 and since there is no objection, this application is allowed.
Accordingly, the order dated 06.04.2022 is set aside and the Appeal is restored to its original position.
F.C.A.No.135 of 2009
Mr. J. Venudhar Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions, would submit that respondent is ready to obtain decree of divorce and she is ready to appear before the Mediator.
Mr. K. Chaithanya, learned counsel for the appellant reported no objection for referring the matter to Mediation.
In view of the above submissions, _________________________, is appointed as Mediator.
The Registry is directed to transmit the entire file to the Mediation Centre at High
SL. No. DATE
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE Court Legal Services Committee, Hyderabad.
List on 29.09.2026, immediately after fresh matters.
________ KL,J ________ SKS,J Note: Furnish CC today B/o.ss
SL. No. DATE
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE