WP/33789/2026 of M/s Lucky Multicuisine Restaurant, Vs The State of Telangana, on 6 October 2026

1. The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary' Municipal Administration and 0rban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The State of Telangana' represented by its Principal Secretary' Home Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad

3. The Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, represented by its Commissioner' - National Academy of Construction (NAC) Building, near HITEX' Madhapur' Hyderabad.

4. The Zonal Commissioner, Kukatpally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Kukatpally, Hyderabad.

5. Deputy Commissioner, Madhapur Circle, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation' Madhapur, HYderabad.

6. TheCommissionerofPolice,CyberabadPoliceCommissionerate, Gachibowli, HYderabad.

7. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhapur Zone' Cyberabad' Hyderabad.

8. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad. Madhapur Division, CYberabad,

rtGE- t

9. The Station House Officer, Madhapur police Station, Cyberabad, Hyderabad.

10. The Designated officer, Food Safety, Kukatpaily Zone, Terangana Standards Authority for Food and Essential Drugs (TG-SAFE), Hyderabad. 1 1. E Srihari, S/o E. Muthyalu, aged about 30 years, Occ. Business, R/o.H.No. 1_ 17, Harijan Basthi, Madhapur, Seriligampally, Ranga Reddy, Telangana. '12. E. Dasaradha, S/o E. Ivlasaiah, R/o.H.No. 1-17, Harijan Basthi, Telangana. aged about 6'1 years, Occ. Business, Madhapur, Seriligampally, Ranga Reddy, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Anicle 226 of the constitution of India praying that in the crrcumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased lo issue a writ, order or Direction, more particurarry one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondent Nos. 3 to 9, at the instance of and in collusion with Respondent Nos. 11 and 12, in entering the petitioners' leased premises bearing H.No. 1-7411 and 1-2412, pror No. 1, sy. Nos. 5g and 59 (part), Guttala Begumpet, Opp. Canara Bank, Main Road, Madhapur, Serilingampaily N/andal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad 5000g1, at about 11.45 pM on 02.10.2026 and in demolishing the interiors, fixtures and structures therein from 03.10.202e onwards, without any notice, hearing or order, as ilegar, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of Articles 1 a, I 9( 1 Xg), 21 and 3004 of the constitution of lndia, contrary to the Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation Act, 1955 and contrary to the directions of the Hon'ble supreme court in ln Re. Directions in the lvatter of Demolition of structures, 2024 INSC 866, and consequenfly direct Respondent Nos. 3 to 9, 11 and 12, rheir men and agents, not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the said premises by the petitioners and not to demolish, arter or remove any portion of the said premises or the fixtures and articles of the Petitioners therein, except by folowing due process of raw l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under section r51 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct Respondent Nos. 3 to g, 1 1 and 12, their men and agenrs, not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners, leased premises bearing H.No. 1-7411 and 1-7412, prot No.'r, sy. Nos. sB and 59 (part), Guttara Begumpet, Madhapur, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad 50008.1 , and -- not to proceed with any fu(her demolition of the said premises, pending disposal of the Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI E. VENKATA SIDDHARTHA Counsel for the Respondent No. 'l: GP FOR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 2, 6 to 9 : GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 3 to 5 : SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER, SC FOR cMc Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 10, 1 1 & 12 : -- The Court made the following: ORDER

UlI I'' IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33789 OF 2026 (CNR No. EBHC0r0694s92026) DATE:06.10.2026 Between: M/s. I-ucky Multicui sine Restaurant a registered partnership firm (GSTIN 36A,AJFL6331elZe) Rep. by its Partner Smt. Rehana & another .. Petitioners AND The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad & l l others .. Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) Mr. K. Ravi Mahender, leamed Standing Counsel for Cyberabad Municipal Corporation appearing for respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5 submitted that there is no interference by the respondents' authorities in the possession of the petitioners over the premises bearing H.No.1-7411 and l-7412, plot No.1, Survey Nos.5{i and 59 (part), Gunaia Begumpet, Opposite Canara Bank, Main Road, Madhapur, Serilingampally Mandla, Ranga Reddy District, Hyderabad' ve..

BVR,J wP_13789_2026 ., Leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Home appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 6 to 9 submitted that there is no interference by the police authorities in the possession of the petitioners over the subj ect premises. A complaint was lodged by petitioner No.2 which was registered as F.I.R. No.1526 of 2026 and another complaint was lodged by the Police Head Constable which was registered as F.I.R. No.1532 of 2026. Respondent Nos.l1 and 12 are landlords and the petitioners are tenants of the subject premises. The complaints are being investigated into.

3. Mr. E. Venkata Siddhartha, leamed counsel for the petitioners, submitted that respondent No.10 conducted surprise inspection at the restaurant of the petitioners on 26.09.2026 and passed orders vide Proceedings No.26IFSDO/KPZ/FSSA/2026 dated 26.09.2026 and issued certain directions like displaying valid FSSA licence prominently at the premises for public visibility, cleaning and sanitizing atl food storage containers and maintaining them in hygienic condition etc. The directions are being scrupulously followed. Despite the same, the Municipal officials came to the subject premises which is tenanted premises of the petitioners and

--J J 8YR,J wP_33789_2026 abruptly started demolition activity without prior notice to the petitioners and without following due process of law.

4. As it is stated by the leamed Standing Counsel for Cyberabad Municipal Corporation and the learned Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home that there is no interference by the Corporation and Police officials, recording the same, the writ petition is disposed of, at the admission stage itself. However, it is made clear that if any action is to be initiated by the Municipal and Police officials against the petitioners, due process of law shall be followed.

5. As seen from the record, the petitioners did not seek any relief against respondent No.10. So far as the relief against respondent Nos.l 1 and 12 is concemed, as it is a private dispute between the tenants (petitioners) and the landlords (respondent Nos.l 1 and I 2), no orders are required to be passed against respondent Nos.l I and 12. The petitioners are at liberty to approach the competent civil Court for the relief against respondent Nos.l l and 12, if they are so advised. No order as to costs { I

- BYR,J wP_33789_2026 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed.

SD/. A.H.S.GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, /a secrffiPt'tt* The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development o"purtr",lt Telangana Secretariat, State of Telangana' Hyderabad' The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Telangana Secretariat' State of

Telangana, HYderabad.

3. TheCommissioner,CyberabadMunicipalCorporation'NationalAcademyof Construction (NAC) Building, near HITEX, Madhapur' Hyderabad'

4. The Zonal Commissioner, Kukatpally Zone, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Kukatpally, Hyderabad'

5. Deputy Commissioner, Madhapur Circle, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation' MadhaPur, HYderabad.

6. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad Police Commissionerate' Gachibowli, HYderabad.

7. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Madhapur Zone' Cyberabad' Hyderabad.

8. The Assistant commissioner of Police, Madhapur Division, cyberabad, Hyderabad.

g. The Station House officer, Madhapur Police station, cyberabad, Hyderabad'

10. One CC to SRI E. VENKATA SIDDHARTHA, Advocate [OPUC]

11. One CC to SRI K. RAVI MAHENDER, SC FOR CMC' Advocate [OPUC]

12. rwo CCs to GP FoR MCPL ADMN & URBAN DEV, High Court for the State of Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT]

13. Two CCs to GP FoR HOME, High Court for The State of Telangana, at Hyderabad IOUT]

14. Two CD CoPies PvL'(t- TKS

HIGH COURT DATED: 0611012026

ORDER

WP.No.33789 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS CC.TODAY n 3 nti 2u6 -\_ ..\ [c \x \lo