Telangana High Court

CRLP/15778/2026 of Uday Venkappa Doddanaikar Vs The State of Telangana , on 5 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.15778 of 2026 (C.N.R No. HBHC010662682026) DATED: 05.10.2026 Between: Uday Venkappa Doddanaikar. … Petitioner – A1 And The State of Telangana represented by Public

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.15778 of 2026

(C.N.R No. HBHC010662682026)

DATED: 05.10.2026

Between:

Uday Venkappa Doddanaikar.

… Petitioner – A1

And

The State of Telangana

represented by Public

Prosecutor High Court at Hyd.

Through SHO, Kothagudem I

Town Police Station, Bhadradri

Kothagudem District.

…Respondent-State

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner – A1 on bail in connection with Crime No.136 of 2026 of P.S.Kothagudem I Town, Bhadradri- Kothagudem District. The offence alleged against the petitioner – A1 is punishable under Section 8 (c) read with 20 (b) (ii) (B) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

2. Heard Sri G.Kumar Yaddlapalli, learned counsel for petitioner – A1 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent – State.

BRMR,J crlp_15778 _2026

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner-A1 is falsely implicated in the case, he is innocent and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. The alleged contraband seized from the possession of the petitioner – A1 is 19.290 Kgs., which is non-commercial quantity and the bar under Section 37 of the NDPS Act has no application and entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner – A1 on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the contraband which is seized from the petitioner – A1 in two bags is arranged by A2 – Nageswara Rao.

5. Sri B.Kishore, S.I of Police lodged a report before P.S Kothagudem I Town on 03.09.2026. It is stated in the complaint that it is case of ‘possession and consumption of contraband (Ganja) by illegal transportation and illegal consumption.’ A1 – Uday Venkappa Doddanaikar was apprehended by the complainant while he was in possession and transporting ganja of 19.5 kgs., in two bags which is arranged by A2 – Nageswara Rao and A3 – Karthik to deliver the same to A4- Anitha, who were absconding. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.

BRMR,J crlp_15778 _2026

6. Petitioner – A1 is arrested on 03.09.2026 and was produced before the concerned Magistrate for remand on 04.09.2026, since then he is judicial custody.

7. It is mentioned in the remand report of petitioner – A1 that A2 – Nageswara Rao, A3 – Karthik and A4- Anitha are absconding. Respondent has altogether examined 12 witnesses in support of the prosecution case and the ganja which is seized by the respondent falls under intermediate quantity. Petitioner – A1 is Driver by occupation, he is entitled for grant of bail subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner – A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Kothagudem. ii. The petitioner – A1 shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner – A1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

BRMR,J crlp_15778 _2026

iv. The petitioner – A1 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

8. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

______________________________

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 05.10.2026. YVL

BRMR,J crlp_15778 _2026

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.15778 of 2026

(C.N.R No. HBHC010662682026)

Date: 05.10.2026

YVL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead