WP/32651/2026 of Male Sai Harshini Vs Union of India on 5 October 2026

1. Union of lndia, Represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi.

2. The Medical Counselling Committee, through its director, Directory General of Health Services, Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi.

3. The National Board of Examination, through his Director Medical, Enclave, Ansari Nagar, ring road, New Delhi,

4. State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Health, Medical and Family Welfare Secretariat, Hyderabad.

5. State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal Secretary to Government, Department of Tribal Welfare, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Hyderabad.

6. The Director, Tribal Welfare Department, Telangana State, Masab Tank, Hyderabad.

7. Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, (KNRUHS), represented by its registrar, Warangal, Telangana State.

8. Osmania Medical College, Represented by its Principal Kothi, Hyderabad.

9. Tahsildar, Balapur, Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to'1. lssue a Writ of Certiorari or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring that, the lmpugned Order of cancellation of admission granted to petitioner in 8th Respondent College in MBBS under competent authority quota for the academic yeat 2026-27 dated 26-09-2026 passed by the 7th Respondent University is illegal, void and unsustainable, being in gross violation of the principles of natural justice, passed without any application of mind and in assumption of jurisdiction without first determining the jurisdictional fact, and further the purported determination has been made without any evidence, and without affording the petitioner any opportunity to adduced any evidence, rendering the order ex facie perverse, and wholly without jurisdiction, fqrthermore the 7th respondenUuniversity has relied upon a behind the back enquiry, the report of which was never supplied to the petitioner, and without there being any prerequisite determination of the basis of applicabihty of Article 371-D of the Constitution of lndia, in so far as Medical Admission is concerned after the advent of All lndia Medical Entrance examination, and after grant of medical admission in the Respondent College, wherein the course has commenced, and furthermore the petitioner is a local candidate even as per Article 371-D of the Constitution of lndia, even though in so far as education is concerned, the said article is no more in force in the State of Telangana, as its application is misconceived in the context of post-NEET medical admissions, particularly after the Petitioner's admission was duly granted and the course had commenced, furthermore there is no other Zonal University, other than the Osmania University within the territory of the present State of Telangana, and consequently no question of regional imbalance within a solitary zone arises, further the impugned order is in derogation of the principle of Rule of Law, so also is in contravention of Articles 14, 19, 21 , 50, 335 and 371-D of the Constitution, amounting to a fraud on power, as such to set aside the impugned order. l.A. NO: 2OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the !aF.1R4EE*@' operation and implementation of the lmpugned Order of cancellation of admission granted to petitioner in 8th Respondent College in MBBS under competent authority quota for the academic year 2026-2027 dated 26-09-2026 passed by the TthRespondent University and restrain the Respondents from interfering with the Petitioner's admission, attendance and continuation in the MBBS course at the 8th Respondent-College; l.A. NO: 3 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the present writ Petition, without prejudice to her rights and contentions. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI ANAND KUMAR KAPOOR Counsel for the Respondent Nos.l to 3: SRI N.BHUJANGA RAO, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA Counsel forthe Respondent No.4: SRI T.RAMESH, AGP FOR MEDICAL HEALTH & FAMILY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.5&6: SRI D.NARSIMULU, AGP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent No.7: SRI T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS Counsel for the Respondent NO.8: SC FOR OU Counsel for the Respondent No.9: GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER

PaBe 1 of 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUS-TICE P.SAM KOSHY AND ]'HL, TIONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NARSING RAO NANDIKONDA lnterlocutory Application No.3 of 2026 in / and Writ Petition No.32651 of 2026 CNR.No.HBHC0l0670892026 B wa o Lu nch Motion Date of Order : 05.10.2026 BEIWEE\: Nlale Sai Halshini, D1o. Male Chandra Sekhar Naik ..petltlonel Vs Union ollndia and 8 others . . . respondents ORDER: lper Hon'ble.Sri Ju.ytice P.SAM KOSHy) when the matter is taken up tbr hcaring, learned counsel for the peritioner played lor withdrarval of the instant wrir petition since the petitioner herein has got admission into MBBS in a dillerent Stal-c. and the petitioner herein no longer intends to pursue to instant writ Petition: and therelore prayed for withdrawal of the instant Writ Petition.

2. The above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner has not been opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents.

-

3. In view of above, I.A.No.3 of 2026 in Writ petition No.3265i of 2026 stands allowed. As a consequence, the Writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. However, the withdrawal of the writ petition is without prejudice to any of the grounds raised by the petitioner in the instant writ petition. No costs.

As a consequence, miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// Sd/-C.DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, PMK '1. One CC to SRt ANAND KUMAR KAPOOR, Advocate tOpUCl

2. One CC to SRt N. BHUJANGA RAO, DEpUry SOL|C|TOR GENERAL OF tNDtA IoPUC]

3. One CC to SRt T.SHARATH, SC FOR KNRUHS [OPUC]

4. One CC to SC FOR OU tOpUCl

5. Two CCs to Gp FOR MEDTCAL.HEALTH & FAM|Ly, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . tOUfl

6. Two CCs to Gp FOR SOCIA_LWELFARE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . tOUfi --' LI \L' I 'rYr I rrv' Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad . [OUT] Two CD Copies

I

HIGH COURT DATED: 0511012026

ORDER

tA NO.3 0F 2026 CC TODAY g S l-A i6, o;<. ( ( o L) 0 5 ofl 2tr26 v IN/AND WP.No.32651 ot 2026 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS '\t 't,o o