Telangana High Court
CRP/3098/2026 of Elasarapu Sadanadam, Vs Jangam Swarnalatha on 1 October 2026
IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETIT toN NO: 3098 OF 2026 Petition under Anide 227 of the constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated
IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITtoN NO: 3098 OF 2026
Petition under Anide 227 of the constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the order dated 16.09.2026 passed in LA No 762 of 2026 in o.s No 155 of 2026 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal.
Between:
AND
Elasarapu Sadanadam, S/ o. yellaiah, Age. 64 years, Occ. Business, R/o.
H.No. 11-24-256, Bank Cotony, Warangal City and District
...PETITIONER
Jangam Swarnalatha, Wo. Late Sambamurthy, Age. 60 years, Occ.
Household.
Jangam Rajesh, S/o. Late Sambamurthy, Age. 44 years, Occ. private Emp Ioyee Jangam Rakesh, S/o. Late Sambamurthy, Age 42 years, Occ. private Employee Respondent Nos 1 to 3 are R/o H.No.-22_8_84i6, Sri Rama Colony, Doctors Colony, Warangal District lVleeankshi Bai, Wo.MahindrakarChandraprakesh, Age 55 years, Occ.
Business, R/o H.No. 13-'t-'133, Flat No. 108, Sai 1o*ers, Ivlattewada, Warangal District.
Gunda A/anjula, W/o.sathish Kumar, Age. 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o.
H.No. B-9-114 AND 115, JPN Road, Warangal City and District.
...RESPONDENTS
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Pe.ition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondents from creating any charge, mortgage, alienating the Plot \o 24 rn Sy No 1 '1 6 to an extent of 220.00 Sq Yards sitLrated at Shiva Sai Developerrs. Desharpet, Warangal City and District, bounded by. East. 40 Feet Road West Open Plot No 20 North Open Plot No 23 South. Open Plot No 25 in any manner p,endinc disposal of the present Crvrl Revision Petition to third parties.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. Sarampally Mrudula Counsel for the ResPondents: - The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR, THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3O98 of 2O26
(CNR No.HBHCO1O6a2172O26)
Dated: o1.10.2026
Between
Elasarapu Sadanadam
...PETITIONER
And
Jangam Swarnalatha and others
...RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a suit for specific performance in O.S.No.155 of 2O26 was filed before the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, Hanamkonda. Temporary injunction order was sought for in IA.No.762 of 2026 .restraining the respondents/defendants from alienating the suit schedule property. The tr;al Court was not inclined to pass ex parte order and vide impugned docket order dated 16.09.2026 urgent notice was issued to the respondents and the matter was posted in 16.10.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that taking advantage of the same, the respondents are alienating the :- suit schedule property. The very purpose of filing injunction application will be defeated, if long dates are given' The trlal Court ought to have given a shorter date/instead one month date is given' Thus, the petitioner has been put to hardship'
4. The order impugned is passed on 16'09'2026 and since 14 days have already lapsed, this Court is not inclined to pass any orders in the civil revision petition'
5. The civil revision petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file an application fbr advancement of hearing in IA No.762 of 2026 and as and when such application is filed' orders shall be passed by the trial, in accordance with law' considering the urgency involved in the matter' Themiscellaneousapplications,pendingifany'shallstand closed. There shall be no order as costs' i SD/. K. BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
U2 The Senior Civil Judge' Warangal One CC 1o Smt. SARAIT/IPALLY MRUDULA Advocate [OPUCI Tvro CD CoPtes TPK/GNK
HIGH COURT DATED: 0111012026 .( iE ST4Ie. ,, s :-',) 0 E [Ci 2ir26
ORDER
CRP.No.3098 of 2026 CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISPOSED OF i:. lt -. t", I .i' ! ( !a f { \,