CRLP/13233/2026 of Quazi Mohammed Akbaruddin @ Quazi Mohammed Akramuddin Vs The State of Telangana on 1 October 2026

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition has b,een filed under Section 528 ol the Bharatiya Nagarik Sulaksha Sanhita,202.i (1br short'thc t3NSS')b.v- thc petitioner/accu sed No.2 seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C. No.308 ol 2023 on the flle of the Special Judicial First Class Magistrate for Excise Cases at Gandhi Bhavan. Ilydcrabad. fbr the olfence punishable under Section 304-A o1'the Indian Penal Code, I 860 (lor short'the IPC').

2. Heard Mr. Zakir Ali Danish, learned counsel lor the petitioner, Mr.Moharnrned Abdul Rahuran, lcarncd counsel lor respondent No.3'

and Mr.J ithendar Rao Veeramalla. learned Additional public prosecutor fbr respondent Nos. I and 2.

3. l,earned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not comrnitted any of-fence and has been falsely implicated in the present case. However. at the instance of elders and well-wishers, the parties entered into a N{ernorandum of Understanding (MOU) d,ated24.ll.2025. Pursuant to the said MoU, respondent No.3 agreed to rvithdraw the case and quash the proceedings in C.C.No.308 of 2023. He further submitted that accused No.1 approached this Court by rrling crl.p.No.33g or 2024, seeki.g quashing o1'the proceedings in c.c.No.30g of 2023. ln the said proccedings, accuscd No.1 and rcspondent No.3 in Crl.p.No.33g of 2024, on the basis of the compromise entercd into between them, compounded the ofrence. and this Corrrt consequently quashed the proceedings against accused No,l in C.C.No.308 o1.2023.

4. He further submitted that respondent No.3 and accused No.l, without informing the petitioner, approached this Court and filed crl P.No.338 of 2024 behind the back of the petirioner. Respondent No.3 is also nor co,in-e furward Lo withclraw all the cases pending against the petitioner and is intentionally seeking to continue the proceedings against him. l{e also submitted that, in view of the offence having been .EEU'!EE7

compounded in C.C.No.308 of 2023 between accused No. I and respondent No.3, respondent No.3 is not entitled to continue the proceedings against the petitioner in the present C.C. Hence, the continuation of the proceedings against the petitioncr is a clear abtts,-' o1- process of law and is contrary to the principlcs laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and anotherr and Anil Mishra v. State of U.P.r and State of Madhya Pradesh v. Laxmi Narayan and others].

I-earned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for respondent Nos. I and 2, and thc learned coltnsel appearing lor respondenL No.3. have not disputcd thc submissions tladc by tltc lcarncd counscl lbr thc petitioner.

6. ln view of the subrrissions made by the leamed counscl fbr the petitioner and in view of thc conrplotnisc erltcrcd into betrvecn the respondent No.3 and accused No.1 in Criminal Petition No.338 of 2024, the proceedings against the petitioner in C.C. No.308 of 2023 on the file ofthe Special Judicial Frrst Class \lagisLratt'lbl lrrcisc ('ascs al (iandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. '2012(ro)scclo3 ' 2o:'r l',l sc t8g ' 20 r9 (5) scc 688

-

To,

Accordingly., the Crirninal pcrition is allowed Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. SD/-C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER

1. The Special Judge, First Class Magistrate for Excise Cases at Gandhi Bhavan, Hyderabad..

2. The Station House officer, Bahadurpura Police Station, Hyderabad.

3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

4. One CC to Sri. Zakir Ali Danish, Advocate [OPUC]

5. One CC to Sri Mohammed Abdul Rahman, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CD Copies GNK g^

HIGH COURT DATED: 0111012026

ORDER

CRLP.No.13233 ol 2026 ALLOWING THE CRIMINAL PETITION 1$c S1 ArE + oA o :l,J i-) 0 5 0[:T 2$ffi +i.9 v o * 'rY l: 1C, z-)n qL,)- ,1\ ,"L