WP/33046/2026 of Vangala Vishnu Vardhan Reddy Vs The State of Telangana, on 1 October 2026

1. Vangala Vishnu Vardhan Reddy, S/o. Krishna Reddy, Age 29 years, Occ Pvt employee, R/o. Plot No.3'l , H. No. 10-74/1 , Srinivas Nagar Colony, Near Govt Hospital, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana - 5V2032.

2. Vangala Vara Laxmi, W/o. Krishna Reddy, Age 49 years, Occ Business, Fl,/o. Plot No.31, H. No. 10-74/1, Srinivas Nagar Colony, Near Govt Hospital, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana - 502032.

3. Vallabhapuram Bala Subramanyam, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, Age 32 years, Occ Business, Fl/o.H.No. 21 -4, Ambedkar Colony, Tellapur, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana - 502O32.

4. Vallabhapuram Purna Shankar, S/o. Srinivasa Rao, Age 32 years, Occ Business, Rl/o.H.No. 21-4, 1't floor, Plot No.225, Ambedkar Colony, Tellapur, Ramachandrapuram Mandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana - 502032. .....PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration AND Urban Development Secretariat Building Hyderabad District.

2. The Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Rep by its Commissioner, NISE, lzzathnagar, Hyd erabad, Koth ag ud a, Tela nga na 500084.

3. The Deputy Commissioner, CMC - Ameenpur Circle - 47, Hyderabad District, Telangana - 502032.

4. The Town Planning Officer, CMC - Ameenpur Circle, Hyderabad District,

.,...RESPONDENTS Petition Under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other order or Writ declaring the action of the respondent No. 2 to 4 more particularly Respondent No. 3 pertaining to interfering of the with subject property i.e,, plot bearing No. '156iPart in Sy. No. 46lEEl I, admeasuring an extent of 113.33 Sq. Yds , and plot bearing No. 156 in Sy. No. 48/EE, admeasuring an extent of '100 Sq. Yds., situated at Srujana Laxmi Nagar, Patelguda Village, Ameenpur Mandal, Sanga Reddy District in view of the Show Cause Notice No. UC/156/TPS/CMCIAMEE-4712026, dated 01 .09.2026 issued by the Respondent No.3 through the whats app is illegal, arbitrary, violative of the principles of natural justice and Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently set aside Show Cause Notice No. UC/ 156/TPS/CMC/AMEE-47/2026, dated 01 09.2026. |.A.NO:1 OF 2026 Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 not to interfere with the petitioners property i.e., plot bearing No. '156/Part in Sy. No. 46lEEl 1, admeasuring an extent of 1 '13.33 Sq. Yds., and plot bearing No. 156 in Sy. No. 48/EE, admeasuring an extent of '100 Sq. Yds., situated at Srujana Laxmi Nagar, Patelguda Village, Ameenpur Mandal, Sanga Reddy District, pending disposal of the above writ petition. Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI RAMAVARAM CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent No.1 : GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 to 4: SRI K.RAVI MAHENDER, SC FOR CYBERABAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (CMC) The Court made the following ORDER

t- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITON No.33046 OF 2026 G N R. No. H B H C 0 1 067 9 47 2026 Date:01.10.2026 Between: Vangala Vishnu Vardhan Reddy and others . Petitioners AND The State of Telangana Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad District, and others. .. Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) Heard Mr. R. Chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners; and Mr. K. Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for Cyberabad Municipal Corporation (CIVC), appearing for respondent Nos.2 to 4, and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned Standing Counsel for CMC submitted that the writ petition is not maintainable

3. The show-cause notice dated 01 .09.2026, issued to the petitioners alleging deviations from the sanctioned plan covered by - ) I]VR,J Wlr.\o.310,16 2026 permit No.2081/CMCllAlc4712026 dated 09.07.2026, is under challenge in the present writ petition. lt is alleged that the petitioners haver raised construction in deviation of the sanctioned plan and, as such, they have been called upon to submit their explanation within seven days as to why the deviations should not be demolished departm en la lly

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the impugned show-cause notice does not set out any specific allegations or particulars of the alleged deviations and that the allegations contained therein are vague. lt is, therefore, contended that the impugned show-cause notice is liable to be set aside

4. However, this Court is not inclined to enter into the merits of the case at this stage. The petitioners are at liberty to submit their explanation in response to the show-cause notice dated 01 .09.2026, settirg out all their objections and contentions

5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the petitioners to submrt explanation to the show-cause notice bearing No. UC/'l 56/TPS/CMC/A[VEE-47 12026 dated 01.09.2026 within ten (.1 0) days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Upon receipt of such explanation. respondent No.3 shall consider the sanre and pass IW'ElEry

BVR,J WP.No.33046 2026 orders in accordance with law, by giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners, the complainant, and all other interested persons, if any. Till then, no coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners pursuant to the impugned show-cause notice. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed //TRUE COPY// Sd/.T.SRIDEVt ASSrsrANr pr** SECTION OFFIGER To ,M SA '1 . The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration AND Urban Development ' Secretariai Building State of Telangana at Hyderabad District'

2. il; C;;ri.;ione;, cvb;rabal ilunicipat Corporation' NISE' lzzathnasar'

- Hyderabad, Kothaguda, Telangana 500084'

g. ii"-D"ilty Comniisslonei, 6'rtic - at""npur Circle - 47 ' Hyderabad District'

4. The Town Planning officer, cMC - Ameenpur circle, Hyderabad District' Telangana -502032.

5. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT' High - Cortt ior. tn" State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUTI

6. one cc to sRl K.RAiiM",\HEr'rorn, sc ron cieeRABAD MUNICIPAL coRPORATIoN (CMC) (OPUC)

7. One CC to SRI nnrtrnVnnlfur/l CHANDRASHEKAR REDDY' Advocate loPUCl

8. Two CD CoPies

HIGH COURT DATED: 0111012026

ORDER

WP.No.33046 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. C.C.TODAY

.) j '\\. OE OCI \L

I i\ ,^ U4,' iru HE STA