Telangana High Court
CRP/2304/2026 of Y.V. Prasanna Kumar Vs S.Venkateshwar on 1 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2304 OF 2026 Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, prayrng that in the
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2304 OF 2026
Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of lndia, prayrng that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to present this l/emorandum of Civil Revision Petition seeking to grant eight weeks time to hear the E.P.No.33 of 2025 in OS.No.67 of 2005 pending on the file of I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court at Secunderabad which is posted on 30-07 -2026 in view of the revision petition approached the Supreme Court in Diary No.2640612026.
BETWEEN:
1. Y.V. Prasanna Kumar, S/o Late Y.V. Pandurangam, Aged 58 years, Occ Business, R/o Plot Nos.28 and 29, Picket, Secunderabad.
2. Y .V . Vayusutha (Died)
3. Y.V. Sujan (Died)
... Petitioners/Res pondents/J DR
AND
1. S.Venkateshwar, died per LRs DHRs 4 to 6 brought on record as Per Order Dt. 121912022 in 1.A.No.412022 in CCCA No.103 of 20'10
2. S Bhaskar, died per LRs DHRS 7 to 9 brought on record as per Order Dt.12/912022 in LA.No.5/2022 in CCCA No.'103 of 2010.121422o
3. S.Uma A,4aheswara Rao, S/o.Late Hanumantha Rao, 58 Yrs, House Wife
4. S.Padmavathi, Wo Late Sudhakar, 52 Yrs, House Wife
5. S.Sai Krishna, S/o Late Sudhakar, Aged 30 Yrs, Occ. Employee
6. S.Sai Krran, S/o.Late Sudhakar, Aged 24 Yrs, Occ. Student.
AII above are Rlo.1-3-122116 Rajendra Nagar, Dharmapur, Mahaboobnagar District, TG.
7. S.Padmavathi @ Surya Prabha, Wo Late Bhaskar, 72 Yrs, House Wife and R/o. LIG-112, Bharathi Nagar, Ramachandrapuram [Vandal, Irrledak District, rG-502 032
IN THI! HIGH CUT Ii I' T-OR TTIIi STATE OF TELANGANA AT
IIYDERABAD
THE HONOI.]ITA'II-E SRI JTISTICE P.SAM KOSHY
CRP.No.2304 of 2026
,:'\.ri.).io.H8riC0i0513452026)
'+r-
Ilate:01 .10.2026
Betw'een:
Mr.Y.V.Prasanna Kurnar and olhers
Petitioners
Anti
Mr. S.Venkatcsltr.' zrr ;ir'lci .r'ir,-rs . Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard Ms.L-e' i-0,,'':r i'::.l,lireddy. learncd counse representing Mr.K.Sai Krishna l,ioi,ar: iiao. icarned counsel tbr petiti,rner No. t and perused the recorrr.
2. 'fhe instant is ,i;, ,. r r ii iLei'ision Petition rvhich ras been llled under Section i ir r, i'irc l]otic oi' Civil Pror:edure. 1908 (for short "the C.i-' 4. I .,:.-ii jrsL l;ic e\ecution proceedinl;s initiated by the decree-holder iri i i'r.,..,.1 oi'2'J25 in O.S.No.67 o1200-5 on the file of I Additional Chrel'.i1,.i.,. . ;-. it) (-'ivii f'ourt, Secunderabrd.
3. A perusal of iire l','tl,:'il r,,ould sholv that the.iudgrn:nt and decree \\'as passed bl, tlre Lri:LJ l i :,1 ,lri l(.).04,2010 rvhich has altained finalit),' till appeal to the I [(]ir'i. :.r 1..ii--rel.ite Lour1. -Ihe execution proceedings rvere initiated and illir,rl','r:ini pt'r:r:ecLlings werc also initiated and the matter was taken-up bv the Executins ( :):,iii cn 18.09.2026. The attachment warrant has been issued againsL potitioner No.l. Leamed counsel for petitioner No.l submits that u;ririotr:r No. t would be rendered homeless, if he is not proiected lbr a limitcd period of time.
4. Today, when the matter is taken-up 1ix hearing, leamed counsel for petitioner No. l, subrnits given the li-'ur r..'lsl.:s tir.le. petitioner No. i shalI ensure compliance of the order of the f-.r,ccr11ing Cour1. It is further submitted that having regard to the ensiting f'estive season. more pafiicularly, Dussehra, petitioner No. I rnal. i.c -sianicd fimited period of protection -5. In vieu of the same, purely on hi:rra,tiirrian grounds, petitioner No.1 is granted four rveeks lirne s[a1-i ii,i tiLr!]r today to ensure compliance of the ordcr passed by th,: [:.'<::r. i:,1:i;,: 1, trr-rrl. In other words, means that, w'ithin four weeks of 1imc. ;.ir.-it iirilici No.i shall ensure vacating of the suit schedule prelniscs-
6. In view of the sar-ne, it is orclered iLrri rrltr order of attachment issued by the Executing Court ma) bc <lele.rcr1 tili ,11.10.2026 and the attachment proceedings shall theleaiict- h:,,:i.i.:r.' r'rperative beyond 31.10.2026, subject to compliancc n ith ii:e ii:i,.:;iions of the Executing Court.
7 ' with the aibresaiil l'.asons. the civir Revision pr:tition stands disposed oi There shail be :ro order as to costs. Consequerr,,l1.. ;.ti irrtllilncous petitions pending, il. any, shall stand closed. SDI- A.H.S. (JOWRI SHANKAR ASSIS-ANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/I SECTTON OFFICER To, I he I Adcrt onar chief,Ju-d's-1 il:l:1"[:;{ri::;,?8;[3i' One CC to Sri' K Sai Krrsnn
Two CD CoPies GNKq
HIGH COURT DATED: 0111012026 ;.1 SlATS c $s $$ 2[2B C.) -c .;r
ORDER
CRP.No.2304 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS -t ,c&
1. : ."' .. .,i