Telangana High Court
CRLP/14431/2026 of Badugula @ Byru Divyasri @Vivya Vs The State of Telangana on 1 October 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.14431 of 2026 (CNR.No. HBHC010607132026) DATE: 01.10.2026 BETWEEN: Badugula @ Byru Divyasri @ Divya …..Petitioner-Accused No.2 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by its
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14431 of 2026
(CNR.No. HBHC010607132026)
DATE: 01.10.2026
BETWEEN:
Badugula @ Byru Divyasri @ Divya
…..Petitioner-Accused No.2
And
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court at Hyderabad,
Through SHO, Hayathnagar Police Station, Medchal-Malkajgiri District. ..Respondent-Complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 & 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘BNSS’) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail who is arrayed as accused No.2 in connection with FIR No.1147 of 2026 of Hayathnagar Police Station, Malkajgiri District. The offences alleged against the petitioner-accused No.2 are punishable under Sections 61(2)(a), 69, 318(4) r/w 3(5) of BNS.
2. Heard Sri Syamala Ravinder Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent–State.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner-accused No.2 is falsely implicated in the case, she was arrested and remanded to the judicial custody on 23.07.2026, since then she is in jail. A1 is enlarged on bail by the learned District Court on 24.09.2026 vide Crl.M.P.No.1501 of 2026. Statement of the victim is already recorded on 29.07.2026 and police custody of the petitioner-accused No.2 is completed on 29.09.2026. Entire investigation is completed and prayed to enlarge the petitioner-accused No.2 on bail.
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the role played by the petitioner-accused No.2 is clearly depicted in the remand case diary.
5. De-facto complainant has lodged a report before P.S. Hayathnagar on 08.07.2026. It is stated in the complaint that on the advice of her family members, she registered her profile in “Mangalya Balam” a Marriage
Bureau, Habsiguda, intending to contract a second marriage. A1-B. Vasu Goud of Kuntloor Village obtained her profile from the marriage bureau and contacted her over phone stating that he was unmarried. The accused Nos.1 and 2 entered into a criminal conspiracy and falsely represented themselves as brother and sister, dishonestly induced the complainant by making a false promise of marriage and induced her to establish physical relationship with accused No.1 and also induced her to transfer approximately Rs.5,00,000/- towards alleged personal necessities and marriage expenses. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.
6. Petitioner-accused No.2 along with A1-B. Vasu Goud were arrested on 23.07.2026 at 19:00 hours and they were produced before the concerned Magistrate for remand on the same day.
7. Statement of the victim is recorded under Section 183 of BNSS on 29.07.2026. Petitioner-accused No.2 is taken for police custody on 28.09.2026 and 29.09.2026 and thereafter she is again produced before the concerned Court for remand.
8. A1-B. Vasu Goud is enlarged on bail by the learned District Court vide Crl.M.P.No.1501 of 2026 in Crime No.1147 of 2026 on 24.09.2026.
9. Remand Case Diary goes to show that respondent has examined altogether 11 witnesses in support of the case, it appears from the record that major portion of the investigation is completed, detaining the petitioner- accused No.2 further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Hence, petitioner-accused No.2 is entitled to be enlarged on bail, subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioner-accused No.2 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Ranga Reddy District at Hayathnagar. ii. The petitioner-accused No.2 shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10 a.m. to 5 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner-accused No.2 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.(presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioner-accused No.2 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. v. It is made clear that if any of the conditions imposed by this Court are violated, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of the bail.
10. Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. __________________________ B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 28.09.2026 TU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.14431 of 2026 (CNR.No. HBHC010607132026) DATE: 01.10.2026
TU