Telangana High Court
WP/33234/2026 of Venkatesh Vs The State of Telangana on 1 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION NO:33234 OF 2026 Between: Venkatesh, S/o Basavaiah Aged about 38 years,
[ 321e 1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO:33234 OF 2026
Between:
Venkatesh, S/o Basavaiah Aged about 38 years, Occ, Business R/o H.no.6-5- 177, New Bhoiguda, Secuenderabad, Hyderabad-500003.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad.
3. The commissoner Task force., Hyderabad.
4. The S.H.O., PS.SR.Nagar, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action persons from the respondent no.3 office in repeatedly calling the petitioner through 9052552188 phone number by persons claiming to be Task Force Police, without any written notice any complaint from anybody whatsoever, causing harassment and fear to the petitioner and his family members as illegal, arbitrary and abuse of process of law and violation of fundamental rights as the guaranteed violates Articles '14, '19 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia. Consequently direct the Respondent Nos. 3 not to harass the ,':ffrtnTr-*
'!.-..a-.!'
petitioner and his family members through repeated phone calls by persons claiming to be Task Force Police without following the due process of law
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petltion, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondenl no. 3 not to take any coercive action against the petitioner and his family member wrthout following due process of law, pending disposal of the above writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI RAMA KRISHNA KULKARNI
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI D.PRADEEP' AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGTI COURT FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOT]RABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION NO.33234 OF 2026
(CNR No.HBHC0[067 8402026)
DATED :01.10.2026
Between:
Venkatesh
... Petitioner
AND
The State ofTelangana rep. by its
Principal Secretary, Home Department,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and others
. Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Alleging that respondent No.3 is repeatedly calling the petitioner through Ph.No.9052552188 without there being any complaint against the petitioner, this Writ Petition has been filed. Z, Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that there is a case in FIR No.343 of 2026 dr.05.06.2026 of S.R.Nagar Police Station, W.P No.33234 o12026 Hyderabad District which has been registered against the petitioner and charge sheet has also been filed therein and yet, the petitioner is now being called repeatedly to the police station by the respondents without there being any involvement by the petitioner in any other case.
3. Sri D. Pradeep, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home representing respondent No.4, on oral instructions, submitted that respondent No.4 has not called the petitioner to the police station and srnce charge sheet is filed, the petitioner is not being called in conrrection with FIR No.343 of 2026. As regards respondent No.3, he seeks time to get instructions.
4. In view of the same and particularly the charge sheet has already been flled in FIRNo.343 of 2026, there is no cause to the respondents to call the petitioner to the police station. Respondent No.3 is therefore directed not to call the petitioner to the police station in connection with FIR No.343 of 2026 of S.R.Nagar Police Station, Hyderabad unless there is any other case registered against the petitioner.
5. The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as to costs.
[i.P. No.3i2i.] o12025
6. Pending miscellaneous petitions. if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. Sd/-A,H.S. GOWRI SHANKAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYI/ I!! G- SECTION OFFICER To, PMK '1 . The Principal Secretary, Hcme Depaftment, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana-
2. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad.
3. The commissoner Task force., Hyderabad-
4. The S.H.O., PS-S.R,Nagar, Hyderabad.
5. One CC to SRI RAMA KRISHNA KULKARNI, Acivocaie [OPUC]
5. Two CCs to GP FOR CC TODAY, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies (rpl UI
HIGH COURT DATED: 0111012026
ORDER
WP.No.33234 ot 2026 CC TODAY SI ArE
v 05 ncr ?{,8 , .:; 't-'Y l'.' '.i.
* .ii :1 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS ,G) cg J.;