Telangana High Court
CRP/3083/2026 of Elasarapu Sadanadam Vs Jangam Swarnalatha on 1 October 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SJX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3083 0F 2026 Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SJX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3083 0F 2026
Petition under Arlicle 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 16.09.2026 passed in l.A No 764 of 2026 in O S No 156 ol 2026 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal.
Between:
Elasarapu Sadanadam, S/o. Yellaiah, Age, 64 years, Occ. Business, R/o H.No. 11-24-256, Bank Colony, Warangal City and District
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Jangam Swarnalatha, W o. Late Sambamurthy, Age. 60 years, Occ.
Household.
2. Jangam Rajesh, S/o. Late Sambamurthy, Age. 44 years, Occ. Private Employee.
3. Jangam Rakesh, S/o. Late Sambamurthy, Age. 42 years, Occ. Private Employee. Respondent Nos 1 to 3 are R/o H.No.22-8-8416, Sri Rama Colony, Doctors Colony, Warangal District
4. [Vlahindrakar Chandraprakesh, S/o. Yellapa Rao, Age. 67 years, Occ.
Business, R/o. H.No. I 3-1-1 33, Flat No. 'l 08, Sai Towers, Mattewada, Warangal District.
5. Gundu Sathish Kumar, S/o. Late Shankar Lingam, Age. 62 years, Occ.
Business, R/o. H.No. 8-9-114 and 115, JPN Road, Warangal City and District.
...RESPONDENTS
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant injunction restraining the respondents from creating any charge, modgage, alienating the Plot No 68 in Sy No 1 18 to an extent of 184.00 Sq Yards situated at Shiva Sai Developers, Deshaipet, Warangal City and District, bounded by. East. Open Plot No 70 West.30 Feet Road North. Open Plot No 69 South. Open Plot No 67 in any manner pending disposal of the present Civil Revision Petition to third parties and pass any other orders in the interest ofjustice and equity in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. Sarampally Mrudula Counsel for the Respondents:
The Court made the following: ORDER
--
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.3o83 of 2026
(CNR No.H 8HCO10680722026)
Dated: O .1o.2f)26
Between
Elasarapu Sadanadam
...PETITIONER
And
Jangam Swarnalatha and others
...RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that a suit for specific performance in O.S.No.156 of 2026 was filed before the Senior Civil Judge, Warangal, Hanamkonda. Temporary injunction order was sought for in IA.No.764 of 2026 restraining the respondents/defendants from alienating the suit schedule property. The trial Court was not inclined to pass ex parte order and vide impugned docket order dated 16.09.2026 urgent notice was issued to the respondents and the matter was posted in 16.10.2026.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submitted that taking advantage of the same, the respondents are alienating the rr- suit schedule property. The very purpose of filing injunctlon application will be defeated, if long dates are given. The trial Court ought to have given a shorter date instead one month date is given. Thus, the petitioner has been put to hardship.
4. The order impugned is passed on 16.09.2026 and since 14 days have already lapsed, this Court is not inclined to pass any orders in the civil revision petition.
5. The civil revision petition is disposed of giving liberty to the petitioner to file an application for advancement of hearing in IA. No.764 of 2026 and as and when such application is filed, orders shall be passed by the trial, in accordance with law, considering the urgency involved in the matter. The miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as costs. //TRUE COPY//
1. The Senior Civil Judge, Warangal. 2 Cne CC to SmT SARAMPALLY IVRUDULA Advocate [OPUC] 3 Two CD CoPies SD/- K. BHAVANI SWAMY ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To, M TPK/GNK
HIGH COURT DATED: 0111012026 1rt- s'rAI{: s 6 0[T 2[26 \:' J io -) i:) l \ ..ir_ i.. ... -.....: - .t- {':-.'-.',, -- _''
ORDER
CRP.No.3083 of 2026 CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS DISPOSED OF lo ic b q \1