Telangana High Court
WA/1073/2026 of M/s Pallavi Developers,a Proprietary Concern Vs Mohammed Abdul Samad on 30 September 2026
THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.1073 of 2026 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 1. 30.09.2026 HCJ (AKrS,J) & VRKR,J I.A.No.2 of 2026 For the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, this interlocutory application seeking to dispense with filing of certified copy
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MAIN CASE No:
W.A.No.1073 of 2026
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl.
No.
Date
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
1. 30.09.2026 HCJ (AKrS,J) & VRKR,J
I.A.No.2 of 2026
For the reasons stated in the supporting affidavit, this interlocutory application seeking to dispense with filing of certified copy of the impugned order is allowed. _______________ HCJ (AKrS,J)
_______________ VRKR,J
I.A.No.1 of 2026
Learned counsel Sri Malipeddi Srinivas Reddy appears for the appellant.
Learned counsel Sri M.Venkata Narasimha Reddy appears for respondent No.1/writ petitioner.
Sri G.Bhaskar, learned Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, appears for respondent No.2.
Sri Srinivasa Rao Pachwa, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appears for respondents No.3 to 5.
Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any.
2
Sri Muralidhar Reddy Katram, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appears for respondents No.6 to 8.
Sri V.Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, appears for respondent No.10.
On hearing learned counsel for the parties and on being satisfied with the explanation urged, the delay of 61 days in filing the appeal is condoned.
The interlocutory application is accordingly allowed.
_______________ HCJ (AKrS,J)
_______________ VRKR,J W.A.No.1073 of 2026 Writ appeal is allowed. (vide separate judgment)
B/o. vs