Telangana High Court

CRLP/15292/2026 of SAHIK FAHEEMAHIK FAHEEM Vs The State Of Telangana on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.15292 of 2026 (C.N.R No. HBHC010643162026) DATED: 30.09.2026 Between: Shaik Faheem … petitioner – A1 And The State of Telangana, Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.15292 of 2026

(C.N.R No. HBHC010643162026)

DATED: 30.09.2026

Between:

Shaik Faheem

… petitioner – A1

And

The State of Telangana,

Rep. by Public Prosecutor,

High Court for the State of

Telangana, Hyderabad.

...Respondent-

complainant

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R

1. This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioner – A1 on bail in connection with Crime No.299 of 2026 of P.S. Saifabad, Hyderabad. The offences alleged against the petitioner – A1 are punishable under Sections 111, 123, 125, 318 (4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) and 18 (c) read with 27 (b)(ii) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.

BRMR,J crlp_ 15292_2026

2. Heard Sri Ch.Janardhan Reddy, learned counsel for petitioner – A1 and Sri D. Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for respondent – State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner – A1 is falsely implicated in the case, entire investigation is completed. Accused No.2 is enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Judge on 07.09.2026 vide Crl.M.P.No.4011 of 2026 and accused No.3 is enlarged on bail by this Court on 24.09.2026 vide Crl.P.No.15219 of 2026. Detention of the petitioner – A1 in judicial custody is not required and prayed to enlarge the petitioner – A1 on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the role played by the petitioner – A1 is clearly depicted in the remand case diary.

5. V.Parameshwari, Sub-Inspector of Police has lodged a complaint before P.S. Saifabad wherein she stated that petitioner – A1 while searching for Mephro (Mephentermine Sulphate Injection) on India Mart Website came in contact with A4 who offered to supply the said Schedule-H prescription drugs through courier. Acting on the offer, A1 to

BRMR,J crlp_ 15292_2026

A3 placed an order with A4 and made payment for the consignment. Basing on the said complaint, FIR came to be registered.

6. Petitioner – A1 along with A2 and A3 were arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 30.07.2026, since then they are in jail.

7. Accused No.2 is enlarged on bail by the learned Sessions Court on 07.09.2026 vide Crl.M.P.No.4011 of 2026 and accused No.3 is enlarged on bail by this Court on 24.09.2026 vide Crl.P.No.15219 of 2026.

8. Since major portion of the investigation is completed, detaining the petitioner – A1 further in judicial custody will not serve the purpose, hence, he is entitled to be enlarged on bail subject to following conditions: i. The petitioner – A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad. ii. The petitioner –A1 shall appear before the concerned SHO between 10:00 a.m.

BRMR,J crlp_ 15292_2026

and 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required. iii. The petitioner – A1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS). iv. The petitioner – A1 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses. v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

9. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

______________________________

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J Date: 30.09.2026. YVL

BRMR,J

BRMR,J crlp_ 15292_2026

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.15292 of 2026

(C.N.R No. HBHC010643162026)

Date: 30.09.2026

YVL

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead