WP/32694/2026 of Sri Tera Nagarjuna Reddy Vs The State of Telangana on 29 September 2026

1. Sri Tera Nagarjuna Reddy, S/o. Sri Tukaram Reddy Tera, aged about 41 years, Occ. Employee, Fl/o. Flat No.304, Sun City Apartments, Yellareddy Guda, Hyderabad - 500 073.

2. Sri Pothula Nandagopal, S/o. Sri Pothula Venkata Prasada Rao, aged about 65 years, Occ. Service, Rl/o. FIat No.1402, LH2, Lanco Hills, Manikonda, Hyderabad - 500 089.

3. Smt. Pothula Anuradha, W/o. Sri Pothula Nandagopal, aged about 60 years, Occ. Housewife, Rt/o. Flat No.1402, tH2, Lanco Hills, Manikonda, Hyderabad

- 500 089.

4. Smt. Siddham Shireesha, D/o. Sri Kanakaiah Siddham, aged about 34 years, Occ. Private Employee, Ri/o. H.No.9-6-273, Ram Nagar, Rampur, Karimnagar, Telangana - 505 001 .

5. Smt. Deepa Reddy Murikinati, D/o. Sri Murikinati Nageswara Reddy, aged aboul 27 years, Occ. Business R/o. H.No.2-2-11321111114, Shivam Road, New Nallakunta, Musheerabad, Hyderabad - 500 044.

6. Smt. Jahnavi Sanakayala, D/o. Sri Dasari Syam Babu, aged about 35 years, Occ. Business, Rl/o. H.No.B/202-B, Sriram Puram, Old Cunent Office Road, Gudivada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh - 521 3O1 .

7. Sri Ashok Kumar Sharma, S/o. Late Vasu Dev Sharma, aged about 56 years, Occ. Business, R/o. H.No.3-6-307/A AND B, Flat No.304, Legend Premier Apartments, Basheerbagh, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad - 500 029.

8. Smt. Kalapatapu Teja Sravani, D/o Sri Kalapatapu Bala Subramanya Srinivas, Aged about.34 years, Occ. Employee, R/o. H. No.37-93/102, Road No.4, Madhura Nagar, Opp. lane of Ganesh Temple, Sainikpuri, Tirumalagiri, Sainikpuri, Hyderabad - Telangana -500094.

9. Sri Siva Ganesh Ganti, S/o. Sri Venkateswara Sarma, aged about 41 years, Occ. Private Employee, Fl/o. H.No.7-178, Pallapu Veedhi, Peruru, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533 218.

10. Smt. Ganti Radha Koumudi, W/o. Sri Siva C)anesh Ganti, aged about 36 years, Occ. Housewife, Fi/o. H.No.7-178, F'allapu Veedhi, Peruru, East Godavari District, Andhra Pradesh - 533 218. 1 1,Sri Raghavendra Malladi, S/o. Late Siva Rama Krishna Murthy Malladi, aged about 54 years, Occ. Private Employee, Rl/o. Flat No.406, D.No.3- 151751831406, Twin Diamonds, Kundan Na1;ar, Puppalaguda, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District - 500 089.

12. Smt. Duppadigattu Sarika Reddy, W/o. Sri D. Srinivas Reddy, aged about33 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Flat No.401, Geretham Onyx, Plot No.C-21, Westend Meadows Layout, Narsingi, Gandipct lVlandal, Ranga Reddy District

- 500 089. 13,Smt. Miryala Rajani, W/o Sri Mriyala Dayakar Fteddy, Aged about.44 years, Occ. Private employee F/o House No. 1-12, -[horur lMandal, Cherlapalem, Warangal, Telangana..

14. Sri.Kiran Reddy Vangal, S/o Sri Karunakar Reddy Vangal, Aged about. 38 years, Occ. Private Employee, Rl,/o. Plot No. 21, Madhupala Enclave, Akbar Road, Centre Point, Tirumalagiri, Manovikasnagerr, Hyderabad

15. Sri Subrahmanyam Yanamandra, S/o. Late Seshagiri Rao, aged about 52 years, Occ. Service, H.No.3-144, Plot No.34, Vitis Villa, Dhoolapally, Kompally, Dulapalle, Medchal-Malkajgiri District - 500 014.

16. Sri Sudarsanam Srinivasa Raj Mohan, S/o Sri Anantha Venkata Stayanarayanacharyulu Sudarsanam Aged about. 35 years, Occ. Employee R/o. H.No. 1-1-309/60/203, Madhava Towe:rs, Aditya nagar Kapra, Hyderabad, IVledchal, Telangana - 500062.

17. Sri Praveen Parimala, S/o Sri P. Janardhana Rao, Aged about. 48 years, Occ. lT Employee, Ri/o. Flat No.5511, Block-A, Pranaya Lotus Park Apts, Safari nagar Colony, Beside Govt High School, Kondapur, K.V. Ranga Reddy District, Telangana 500084.

18. Smt. B. Kavitha, W/o. Sri K. Thejeswarananda Prasad, aged about 37 years, Occ. Advocate, R/o, C/50'1 , The Portico, Western Meadows layout, Narsingi Muncipality, Kothapet, Telangana - 500089 '19.Sri Manda Sunder Babu, S/o. Late Manda Hari Rao, aged about 51 years, Occ. Employee, F:/o. H.No.8-3-19114O, Flat No.3tl1, Plot No,30/A,Vengalrao Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

20. Smt. lV'landa Seetha Ratnam, W/o. Sri Manda Sunder Babu, aged about 46 years, Occ. Home Maker, Ri/o. H.No.8-3-19114O, Flat No.301, Plot No.30/A, Vengalrao Nagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad. ...PETITIONERS AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Metropolitan Area and Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Rep. by its Metropolitan Commissioner, Tarnaka, Hyderabad.

-

3. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Kongara Kalan, lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Muncipal Coroproation, (GHMC) Circle 45 , Serilingampally Zone, Hyderabad.

5. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.

6. Revenue lnspector, Gandipet Mandal, Gandipet, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 oI the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over their respective flats in the residential apartment complex known as The Portico-(Block-A, Block-B and Block- C), situated on Plot Nos.A-31 to A-35 in Sy. Nos.100, 101 , 102 and 116 (part), Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and in identifying portions of the said blocks for demolition under the pretext of road widening, without any notice, inquiry or determination and without any authority of law, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the principles of natural justice and of Articles 14,21 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia, and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over their respective flats, and not to demolish or dispossess the Petitioners from any part of the said blocks and land, except in accordance with due process of law, l.A. NO: 1OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to demolish any portion of, or interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the Petitioners over, the residential apartment complex known as "The Portico" (Block-A, Block-B and Block-C), situated on Plot Nos.A-31 to A-35 in Sy. Nos.100, 1O1,1o2 and 1't6 (part), Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition. Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI N.NAVEEN KUMAR Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Respondent No.2: SRI V.NARASIMHA GOUD, SC FOR HMDA Respondent Nos.3, 5 & 6: SRI V.SANDEEP GOUD, AGP FOR REVENUE Respondent No.4: SRI KANCHANI LAXMAIAH, SC FOR GHMC The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32694 OF 2026 CNR.N HBHC 10671982026 Date: 29.09.2026 Between: Sri Tera Nagarjuna Reddy and others AND Petitioners The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, l\rletropolitan Area and Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) Heard Mr. N. Naveen Kumar, learned ccunsel fcr the petitioners; Mr. V. Narsimha Goud, learned Standing (lounsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority (HMDA), appearing for respondent No.2; Mr. V. Sandeep Goud, learned Assistant Government pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.3,5 and 6; and Mr. Kanchani Laxmaiah, learned Standing Counsel for Greatr..r Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, appearing for respondent No.4, and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned Standing Counsel appearin(t for respondent No.2 submitted that if the apartment building of the petitioners, known as - 2 BVR,J W.P.No.32694 2026 "The Portico" (Block-A, Block-B and Block-C), situated on Plot Nos. A-31 to A-35 in Survey Nos.100, 101 , 102 and 116 (part), Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, is required for the purpose of road widening, the respondents would proceed only in accordance with the due process of law. lt is further submitted that markings have been made on the subject property of the petitioners pursuant to the Government's Road Development Plan for the purpose of widening the road

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent authorities have not issued any notice to the petitioners, and that markings have been made 5n the subject property. He further submitted that as seen from Ex. P 1 8-photographs, men and machinery, including a JCB machine, have been deployed at the subject property with an intention to undertake demolition, and therefore, the petitioners were constrained to approach this Court.

4. As seen from the record, it is not in dispute that the petitioners are in occupation of their respective flats in the subject apartment complex known as ''The Portico"

5. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of their respective flats and not to undertake any J To, b AVR,J W.P No.32694 2026 demolition or road-widening activity affecting the subject property, except by following the due process of law. lt is made clear that if any action is initiated or any notice is issuerj by the respondents in contravention of law, the petitioners are at liberty to avail such remedies as are available to them in law and to challenge the same, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. SO/. M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER Hyderabad [OUT]

12. Two CD CoPies '1 . The Principal Secretary, Metropolitan Artla ^and Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat' Hyderaba'J' State of Telangana

2. The Metropolitan Commissioner' Hyderabad Metropolitan Development AuthoritY, Tarnaka, HYderabad '

3. TheDistrictcollector,RangaReddyDistrict,KongaraKalan'lbrahimpatnam tvlandal, Ranga ReddY District'

4. Thecommissioner,GreaterHyderabadlvlr'rncipalcoroproation'(GHMC) Clrcte 45 , Serilingampally Zone' Hyderabad

5. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal' Ranga Reddy District'

6. TheRevenuelnspector,GandipetMandal'Gandipet'RangaReddyDistrict'

7. One CC to SRI N.NAVEEN KUI/AR' Advocab [OPUC]

8. One CC to SRI V NARASIMHA GOUD' SC FOR HMDA IOPUCI

9. One CC to SRI KANCHANI LAXMAIAH' SC FOR GHMC [OPUC]

10. Two CCs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN )EV' Hrgh Court for the State of Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT]

11. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at BSR

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910912026 CC TODAY E_ STAr€ (

ORDER

WP.No.32694 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS q oo 01 0tT 2tuE :.- i \C \b 1tr: