WP/32567/2026 of Mukesh Agarwal Vs The State of Telangana on 29 September 2026

ORDER:

Heard Mr. Mirza Azrnath Ali Baig, learned counsel for the petitroner, Ms. Dara Haritha Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondent Nos. 1 to 4. With their consent, the writ petition is being taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.

2. This writ petition has been filed seeking the following prayer:- " . . ..to issue a Writ order or d.irectiotL more particularly one in tlte nature of W'111T OF MANDAMUS declaing the action of tle respondents 3 nnd 4 in rejecting tlte npplicntions for granting NALA permission 'frnnsnction ruithottt plss book ttide Application Nos.2600376652,2600377 842 and 2600376686 to the petitioner in respect of Agriculturnl land in Sy.No.56 Psrt admeasuring Ac.2.00 gts in Suroey N0.56 situnted at Ferozguda Hio Kongarakaloan Village, Ibrahimaptnnm Rez,entrc Mnrdal, Rnnga Reddy tlistrict is illegal nrbitrary contrnry lo Lato and uiolation Articles 1.4, 'J00A of the Constitution of lndin mrl consequentLy direct tle respondents to grant NALA perntission to the petitioner land stated abozte forthzoith and Pass...." The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that the petitioner claims to be the owner and possessor of agricultural land admeasuring c iizii Ac.2-00 guntas in Sy.No.56 Part, situated ar Ferzoguda H/o Kongarakalan Village, Ibrahimpatnam Revenue Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. It is stated that the petitioner is in peacelul possession and enjoyment of the subject land and intends to con.rert the same into non-agricultural land. It is submitted that, though NALA permissions have been granted in respect of the neighbcuring lands, the respondents have not granted NALA permission to ,he petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner submitted c nline applications bearing Transaction Nos. 26003766 52, 260037 7 842' and 260037 6686 and also paial the requisite amount through e-challan. However, the applications came to be rejected by the 4th respondent. Aggrieved thereby, the present writ petition has been fi1erl questioning the rejection of the petitioner's NALA applications and seeking a consequential direction to the respondents to granl NALA permission in respect of the subject land.

4. karned counsel for the petitioner submits that, though various grounds have been raised in the writ petition, the petitioner confines the relief in the present writ petition to a direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 to consider and dispose of the petitioner's online applic aiion s beaiing,No s. 2 600 37 66 52, 260 O 37 7 84 :,. and 2600 37 66 8 6 and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law.

5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, instructions, submits that, if the aforesaid onlin: applications on are ::3:: pending consideration, the same will be considered and appropriate orders will be passed strictly in accordance with law'

6. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4 to consider the petitioner's online applications bearing Nos.26O03766 52, 2600377 842 and 2600376686' in accordance with law, after conducting necessary enquiry, interested Parties issuing notice to the petitioner and all the and affording them an opportunity of hearing, and pass appropriate orders thereon' In the event the NALA permission cannot be granted for want of pattadar passbook, the respondents shal1 refund the amount paid by the petitioner towarcls the said applications' in accordance with 1aw' The said exercise shali be completed as expeditiously as possible and communicate the orders passed to the petitioner' 7 . Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of' There shall be no order as to costs' As sequel to it, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending' shal1 stand dismissed. sD,- s ltLrLAr$i#'"T$r[i? / ,TTRUE COPY'/ SECTION OFFICER B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat'

To,

Ii,1i:ii':,:[lil"ii,%5113;leoeoartmento-r in" O'.u'", Collector' Ranga Reddy District At Kongarakalan

3. The Revenue Divisional officer, lbrahimpatnam Revenue Division Ranga Reddy district

4. The Tahsildar, lbrahimpatnam Mandal lbrahimapatnam, langa Reddy district.

5. One CC to MR. MIRZA AZMATH ALI BAIG Advocate [OI']UC]

6. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]

7. Two CD Copies AGK PSK \9c\

CC TODAY HIGH COURT DATED: 2910912026

ORDER

WP.No.32567 of 2026

\ ,1),

j. i! + j j .t..' 1/ .i' "s" \" .,/ ::,-:::=-- DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS @ @ c&