Telangana High Court

WP/29495/2026 of Mohammed Ikram Vs The State of Telangana on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITIO N NO: 29495 OF 2026 Between: Mohammed lkram, S/o Mohammed Ahmed,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI

WRIT PETITIO N NO: 29495 OF 2026

Between:

Mohammed lkram, S/o Mohammed Ahmed, aged about45 years, Proprietor of M/s Kenwood Furnitures and lnteriors, Resident ol 4-1-122913 ( old No.4-1-1 22913), Boggulkunta, Hyderabad, Telangana State

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad.

3. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad.

4. The Station House fficer, Abids Police Station, Hyderabad.

5. Sri.C.Pradeep Kumar, S/o. Late. J.Sri.C.Sriramulu, Aged 70 years' occ- Retd', Rl/o. Flat no.G-2, Sri Lakshmi Residency, H.No.3-5-167/40' St No"l '

Venkateswara Colony, Narayanguda, Hyderabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Anicle 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue any writ order or direction more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police more particularly respondent no.4 and his subordinates in interfering in civil disputes pending between the petitioner and respondent no.4 and threatening the petitioner to forcefully vacate the property i.e., all that premises bearing

--a-r

No. 4-1- 1229t3 (old No.4-1-1229), admeasuring 800 sq.feets, on land admeasuring 200

sq.yards, comprising of a big shed, situated at Boggulkunta, Hyderabad, T.S' at the behest of respondent no.s as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and consequently direct the respondent police not to interfere in civil disputes and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the subject property and to pass

l.A. NO: 1OF 2026

Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 and his subordinates not to interfere in civil disputes and not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner over the property

i.e., all that premises bearing No. 4-1-122913 (old No.4-1-1229), admeasuring 800

sq.feets, on land admeasuring 200 sq.yards, comprising of a big shed' situated at Boggulkunta, Hyderabad, T.S, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms RAJPUT AMRITHA FOR SRl. PRAMOD SINGH

Counsel for the Respondent Nos 1 to 4: SRI D.PRADEEP, AGP FOR HOME

Counsel forthe Respondent No 5: SRI N.GANGADHAR

The Court made the following: ORDER

-

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR TIIE STATE OF TELANGANA

ATHTDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI

WRIT PETITION No.29495 of 2026

(CNR No. HBIIC0 r0603942026)

DATE:29.09.2026

Between:

Mohammed Ikram

Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana and others

Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

:: ORDER::

Alleging interference by respondent No.4 police at the instance of respondent No.5, this writ petition has been filed.

2. Heard Ms. Rajput Amritha, leamed counsel representing Sri Pramod Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri D. Pradeep, leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, appearing for respondents No.l to 4, and Sri N. Gangadhar, learned counsel for respondent No.5.

3. The leamed counsel for the petitioner submitted that respondent No.4 is threatening the petitioner to forcefully vacate the property, i'e', -a-- TMD,I wp 29495 2026

premises bearing No.4-l-122913 (Old No. 4-l-1229), adrneasuring 800 sq. feet, on land admeasuring 200 sq. yards, comprising of a big shed, situated at Boggulkunta, Hyderabad, at the behest ofrespondent No.5.

4. The leamed Assistant Govemment Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submitted that the unofficial respondent No.5 has not approached respondent No.4 with any complaint and that respondent No.4 and his subordinates have not interfered with the possession of the petitioner over the subject property in any manner. Therefore, the allegations of interference or threatening are denied.

5. The learned counsel for respondent No.5 also submitted that respondent No.5 has not given any complaint against the petitioner herein

6. In view of the above, the respondent police are directed to follow due procedure in accordance with law, if any action is to be taken, and shall not interfere with the civil disputes between the parties

7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

-/ To, TKS TIMD,J wP 29495 2026 Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. SD/. MOHD ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER The Principal Secretary, State Of Telangana, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad. The Commissioner of Police, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Chirag Ali Lane, Abids, Hyderabad. The Station House fficer, Abids Police Station, Hyderabad. One CC to SRl. PRAMOD SINGH, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI N.GANGADHAR, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP FOR HOME High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies \q.

I PMK @

HIGH COURT DATED: 2910912026

ORDER

WP.No.29495 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS {

.t< S1ATE oA q !) tB stl ?u$ o \ ,6" w_<.b ,(lO' s\

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead