Telangana High Court

CRLP/15108/2026 of Panuganti Narender Babu Vs The State of Telangana on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.15108 and 15311 of 2026 (CNR No. HBHC010629592026 (Crl.P.No.15108 of 2026) (CNR No. HBHC010630922026 (Crl.P.No.15311 of 2026) DATED: 29th SEPTEMBER, 2026 Crl.P.Nos.15108 of 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF

TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.15108 and 15311 of 2026

DATED: 29th SEPTEMBER, 2026

Crl.P.Nos.15108 of 2026

Between:

Panuganti Narender Babu

... Petitioner-Accused No.2

And

The State of Telangana

... Respondent-Complainant

Crl.P.Nos.15311 of 2026

Between:

Kottam Srinivas Reddy

... Petitioner-Accused No.1

And

The State of Telangana

... Respondent-Complainant

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

COMMON ORDER

1. These Criminal Petitions are filed under Sections 480 and 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) praying this Court to enlarge the petitioners on bail who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 and 1 in connection with Crime No.303 of 2026 of P.S. Nagar Kurnool. The offences alleged against the petitioner Nos.1 and 2-A2 and A1 are punishable under Sections 308(2), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Act, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) and Section 4(1) of the Telangana Advocates Protection Act, 2026.

2. Heard Sri Kommu Rajashekar, learned counsel for petitioner Nos.1 and 2 - A2 and A1 and Sri D.Arun Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent - State.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners-A2 and A1 have not committed any offence and they are in judicial custody since 12.08.2026 and entire investigation is completed. Earlier bail petition came to be dismissed vide common order dated 01.09.2026. Since investigation is completed, prayed to enlarge the petitioners- A2 and A1 on bail.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that the role played by the petitioners-A2 and A1 is depicted in the remand case diary.

5. LW.1-M.Venugopal Rao, who is an Advocate by profession, was engaged by A1-K.Srinivas Reddy to file a suit for partition, he charged Rs.90,000/- towards his fees. The suit filed by the complainant came to be dismissed for default on 27.09.2024. Subsequently on 03.02.2025, A1-Srinivas Reddy and his father visited the office of the complainant, picked up quarrel with him and demanded to return the professional fee of Rs.90,000/-. On 05.08.2026 at about 6.30 P.M., A1-Srinivas Reddy went to the house of the complainant along with another person and introduced that person as a professional killer, he demanded another Rs.4,50,000/- failing to pay the same, he would be killed. Basing on the above said complaint, FIR came to be registered on 11.08.2026 under different Sections of BNS and Section 4(1) of the Telangana Advocates Protection Act, 2026.

6. Petitioners-A2 and A1 were arrested on 12.08.2026 and they were produced before the concerned Magistrate for remand, since then they are in judicial custody.

7. Petitioners-A2 and A1 have filed Crl.P.No.13488 of 2026 (A2) and Crl.P.No.13672 of 2026 (A1) for grant of regular bail before this Court, the same came to be dismissed vide order dated 01.09.2026.

8. Material on record goes to show that major portion of the investigation is completed, detaining the petitioners-A2

and A1 in further judicial custody will not serve the purpose. Hence, they are entitled to be enlarged on bail.

9. In the result, petition is allowed subject to the following conditions: i. The petitioners-A2 and A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned I Addl. Judicial Magistrate Cum Mobile Court of First Class at Nagar Kurnool.

ii. The petitioners-A2 and A1 shall appear before the concerned SHO in between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., on every Sunday, Tuesday and Thursday for a period of eight (8) weeks or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation and thereafter, as and when required.

iii. The petitioners-A2 and A1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

iv. The petitioners-A2 and A1 shall not directly or indirectly influence, threaten, or induce any of the prosecution witnesses.

v. In the event of violation of any of the above conditions, the prosecution is at liberty to file an application for cancellation of bail.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

______________________________

B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO, J 29th September, 2026

PLV

THE HON’BLE JUSTICE B.R.MADHUSUDHAN RAO

CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.15108 and 15311 of 2026

DATE: 29.09.2026

PLV

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead