Telangana High Court
WP/32692/2026 of Sri B. Sri Purendhar Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana, on 29 September 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 32692 OF 2026 Between: 1 2 3 Sri B. Sri Purendhar Reddy, S/o. Sri B.
*
[ 31831
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 32692 OF 2026
Between:
Sri B. Sri Purendhar Reddy, S/o. Sri B. Vijaya Bhasker Reddy, aged about 33
years, Occ. Private Employee, Fyo. 81-260, BDL Township, Bhanur'
Sangareddy District - 502 305.
Sri Veggalam Yoga Saikanth, S/o. Sri Veggalam Raghu' aged-about .40
v"rr.,"d".. ars'rntss, Fyo. Fiat No301, Piol Nos1021 and'1022' Golden 'Hr;,' R"J, Rajeshwari Nagar, OU Professors Enclave' Kondapur'
Seriiingampally, Ranga Reddy District - 500 084'
Smt. Kothakapu Navaneetha, W/o' Sri K Govardhan Reddy' aged ?9o'1f.9
;;,
6;;. tovernment oiil.i.r, R/o H No 3-4-526t28' Ftat No 102' ARK
irir"., s1i".t No.7, Barkathpura, Himayatnnagar, Hyderabad - 500 027.
Sri K. Govardhan Reddy, C/o Smt Kothakapu Navaneetha Aged about 6l vears, occ. Agriculture, nyl r]ti'r'r" Cot"eeetnam onvx Apts ' western futeadows lavout, Narsingl"n;'i"'fi'"'"euniiplt uandat' Kokapet R-R
District.
Sri Ganugapanta Dileep Kumar' S/o Sri Ganugapanta Raiu Pixily' aged about 53 vears, occ. Business, Fi;'ftiilt'oze' Pti View Enclave' Manovikas iir,iJi ",ri"o-wJnptriv'
s"tunderabad - 500 011'
s,.ni n. pravarika, w/o :-:::tl tJ:XfiHt"fi"lr,.tli,J.,1#ii!;3i,t tl:lf '5}3'1lJ:fi ff:":it:tIilrp"ir"r'"J"t' rolapet R-R District
...PETITIONERS
AND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The State of Terangana, Rep. by itsprincipar. Secretary, Metropolitan Area and urban o"r"roprl.,lni,o"plrtrl"t, Terangana secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The HyderaO"O furatp"fit"i.Devetopment Authority' Rep by its Metropolitan ' il;;1;;";er' Tarnaka' HYderabad " The District ""u";,;;"n. Reddy District, Kongara Karan, lbrahimpatnam " rtli"no.L, Ranga ReddY District'
4. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Muncipal Coroproation, (GHMC) Circle 45, Serilingampally Zone, Hyderabad. 5 The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District.
6. Revenue lnspector, Gandipet Mandal, Gandipet, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o.; lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of a writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over rheir respective flats in the residential apartment buirding known as 'Geetham onlrx,, situated on prot No.c-2.r, Westend Meadows Layout, Sy. Nos.122 and 123. Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, and in identifying portions of the said buirding for demolition under the pretext of road w.rdening, wrthout any notice, inquiry or determination and without any authority of raw, as ilegar, arbitrary and viorative of the principres of naturarjustice and of Articre s 14,21and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia' and consequently direct the Respondents nol to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over,.eir respective frats, and not to demolish or dispossess the petitioners from any part rlf {hs subject building and land, except in accordance with due process of law. I,A. NO:1OF 2026 petition under section 151 cpc praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fired in support of the petition, the High court may be preased to direct the Respondents not to demolish any portion of, r:r interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners over, the residentiar apartment buirding known as "Geetham onyx", situated on prot No.c-21, westend Meadows Layout, Sy Nos'122 and 123' Narsingi vifiage, Gandipet Manda, Ranga Reddy District, pending disposal of the writ petition. ,,ilflft.;;,;ffi:,;f#,iri#i,r:::,*^ AxtoArAH,SC FOR GHMC
t- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION No,32692 OF 2026 CNR.No.HBHC010672
Date: 29.09.2026 Between: Sri B. Sri Purendhar Reddy and others AND Petitioners The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Metropolitan Area and Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others. .. Respondents ORDER:(ORAL) Heard Mr. N. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners; NIr. V. Narsimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad [t/etropolitan Development Authority (Hl\4DA), appearing for respondent No.2; I\Ir. V. Sandeep Goud, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6; and [Vr. Kanchani Laxmaiah, learned Standing Counsel for Greater Hyderabad [Vunicipal Corporation, appearing for respondent No.4, and perused the material available on record.
2. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submitted that if the apartment building of the petitioners, known as .-
BVR,J 'vV.P No.,12692 2026 "Geetham Onyx", situated on Plot No.C-21 , Wer;tend llleadows Layout, Survey Nos.122 and 123, Narsingi Village, Gandipet [i/andal, Ranga Reddy District, is required for the purpose of roa,J widening, the respondents would proceed only in accordance with the due process of law. lt is further submitted that markings ha ve been made on the subject property of the petitioners pursuant to the Government's Road Development Plan for the purpose of widening tre roac
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the respondent authorities have not issued any nr>tice to the petitioners, and that markings have been made on the subject property. He further submitted that as seen from Ex.P8-photographs, men and machinery, including a JCB machine, have been deployed at the subject property with an intention to undertake demolition, and therefore, the petitioners were constrained to approach this Court
4. As seen from the record, it is not in discute that the petitioners are in occupation of their respective flats in the subject apartment complex known as "Geetham Onyx"
5. Hence, the writ petition is disposed of . directing the respondents not to interfere with the possessio'r and enjoyment of the petitioners in respect of their respective flats ar d not to undertake any demolition or road-widening activity affecting the subject property,
To, BVR,J W.P.No.32692 2026 except by following the due process of law. lt is made clear that if any action is initiated or any notice is issued by the respondents in contravention of law, the petitioners are at liberty to avail such remedies as are available to them in law and to challenge the same, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this writ petition stand closed. SD/- M.NAGAMANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /ffRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Metropolitan Area and Urban Development Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana'
2. TheMetropolitanCommissioner,HyderabadMetropolitanDevelopment Authority, Tarnaka, HYderabad.
3. TheDistrictCollector,RangaReddyDistrict,KongaraKalan,lbrahimpatnam Mandal, Ranga ReddY District.
4. The Commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Muncipal Coroproation' (GHMC) Circle 45 , Serilingampally Zone, Hyderabad'
5. The Tahsildar, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District'
6. TheRevenuelnspector,GandipetMandal,Gandipet,RangaReddyDistrict'
7. One CC to SRI N.NAVEEN KUMAR, Advocate [OPUC]
8. One CC to SRI V.NARASIMHA GoUD, SC FoR HMDA [OPUC]
9. One CC to SRI KANCHANI LAXMAIAH, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC]
10. Two ccs to GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High court for the State of Telangana, at HYderabad [OUT]
11. Two CCs to GP FoR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
12. fwo CD CoPies M. Y -BSR
HIGH COURT DATED: 2910912026
ORDER
WP.No.32692 of 2026 CC TODAY g{A iE I
.t ,' \ () s1 otl ?$t a DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS b
\r L