Telangana High Court

WP/32818/2026 of M/s Saanvi Infra Properties Vs The State of Telangana on 29 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PET ITION NO: 32818 OF 2026 Between: M/s Saanvi lnfra Properties, Rep. by its

IN THE HIGH GOURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 32818 OF 2026

Between:

M/s Saanvi lnfra Properties, Rep. by its Managing Partner Saddikuti Madhu, S/o. Ramakrishnaiah, Aged about 39 years, Occ. Business, Fl/o. Flat No. 601, Pent House, Block-A, Lotus Homes, Alkapur Township, Puppalaguda Village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R District, Telangana State.

...PETITIONER

AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep. 6y its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. The Commissioner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation. National Academy of Construction (NAC) Campus, Hitex Road, Medchal - Malkajgiri' Hyderabad -

500084.

3. The Deputy Commissioner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation. Circle-45'

Narsingi village, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy district.

4. The Executive Engineer, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Assistant City Planner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Circle-45'

Narsingi Village, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Reddy district.

, ..RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue any writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent no. 2 to 5 in interfering with the petitioners schedule property i.e. property bearing Plot No. c-19 admeasuring 625

Sq. Yards and Plot No. C-20 admeasuring 500 sq. Yards in total admeasuring 1125

sq. yards situated in Survey No.102, Narsingi Villagr:, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District. Telangana as illegal, arbitrary and unco lstitutiona I and consequently direct the respondent no.2 to 5 not to interfere and bulldoze the structures raised over the petitioners schedule property i.e. property bearing Plot No. C-19

admeasuring 625 Sq. Yards and Plot No. C-20 admeasuring 500 Sq. Yards in total admeasuring 1 125 sq, yardssituated in Survey No.10:2, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana.

l.A. NO: 1OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to lssue lnterim direction to respondent no. 2 to 5 not to interfere and bulldoze the structures raised over the petitioners schedule property i.e. property bearing Plot No. C-1g admeasuring 625 Sq. Yards and Plot No, C-20 admeasuring S00 Sq. Yards in total admeasuring 1 125 sq. yards situated in Survey No.1C2, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, Telangana, pending disposal of the writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Ms. AYESHA IlUMERA

Counsel forthe Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 5: SRI K.RAVI MAHENDER, SC FOR CMC

The Court made the following: ORDER

--

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

ATHYDERABAD

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIIAYSEN REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.32818 OF 2025

(CNR No. HB H C01067 4892026)

DATE OF ORDER: 29.09.2026

Between:

M/s. Saanvi Infra Properties

...Petitioner

AND

The State of Telangana

Represented by its Principal Secretary

Municipal Administration and

Urban Development Department

Secretariat, Hyderabad and others

.Respondents

ORDER:(ORAL)

Heard Ms. Ayesha Humera, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mr. K.Ravi Mahender, learned Standing Counsel for CMC, appearing for respondents No.2 to 5; and perused the material on record.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in similar circumstances, the order dated 29.09.2026 was passed by this Court in W.P. No.32692 of 2026 and requested similar order may be passed in this writ petition. The said submission is not opposed by the learned Standing Counsel for CMC.

3.

Recording the aforesaid submissions, without expressing any opinion on merits, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondents No.2 to 5 not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner in respect of the .-

subiect property bearing Plot No.C-19, admeasuring 625 square yards and plot No.C-20 admeasuring 500 square yatds, total admeasuring 1,125 square yards in Survey No.102, Narsingi Village, Gandipet Mamlal, Ranga Reddy District, and not to undertake any demolition or road-widening activity affecting the subject property except by following due process of law. It is made clear if any action is initiated or any notice is issued by the respcndents in contravention of law, the petitioner is at liberty to avail such remedies as are available under law and to challenge the same, if so advised. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequcl thereto, miscellaneous applicatic,ns, if any, pending in the writ petition, stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/. M.NAGAMANI

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. The Principal secretary, Municipar Administration and urban Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

2. The commissioner, cyberabad Municipal corporation. Nationar Academy of Construction (NAC) Campus, Hitex Road, Mecchal - Malkajgiri, Hyderabid _

500084

3. The Deputy Commissioner, Cyberabad Muricipal Corporation. Circle-45, Narsingi village, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga R.eddy district.

4. The Executive Engineer, cyberabad Municipal corporation seritingampalty Zone, Ranga Reddy District.

5. The Assistant City Planner, Cyberabad Municipal Corporation, Circle_45, Narsingi Village, Serilingampally Zone, Ranga Fteddy district.

6. One CC to Ms. AYESHA HUMERA, Advocate tOpUCl

7. one CC to SRt K.RAV| MAHENDER, SC FOR CMC tOpUCl S Two ccs to GP FoR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV, High court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUTI

9. Two CD Copies

tw

BSR

HIGH COURT

DATED: 2910912026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.No.32818 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS q. CC TODAY ,yrE S rAl6' 0 1 ocT 2t126

Dro .':"Y o !) 7: * C ').u

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead