Telangana High Court
CRLP/15795/2026 of P. Jaya Prasad Raja Vs The State of Telangana on 28 September 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD IVONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEI\IBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 15795 OF 2026 [ 3303 ] Chairman and Diamond Hills, Between: AND P. Jaya Prasad Raja, S/o. PL Raja, Aged
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
IVONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEI\IBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE J SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 15795 OF 2026
Chairman and
Diamond Hills,
Between:
AND
P. Jaya Prasad Raja, S/o. PL Raja, Aged about 60 years, Occ lVlanaging Director of Jl\,4J Homes Pvt Ltd, R/o. Plot No.62'
Puppalaguda, Gandrpet, Ranga Reddy District.
... Petitio ne r/Defacto Complainant
1. The State of Telangana, Rep.by its Public Prosecutor, High court for the state of Telangana At Hyderabad. Through SHO, Police Station SR Nagar, Hyderabad Drstrict.
2. N. Vanajakshi, W/o. Chalamaiah, Aged about 81 years, Occ. Housewife, R/o 1 10, Jalavayu Vihar, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District.
3. N. Chalamaiah, S/o. Govindaiah, Aged about 82 years, Occ Household, R/o'
110, Jalavayu Vihar, Kukatpally, Ranga Reddy District
4. Pudota Showri Raja, S/o. PL Raja, Aged about 55 years, Occ. Business, R/o'
Plot No.2, H. No.8-3-.191/27212tA, Yengalrao Nagar, Beside Nalanda College, Hyderabad.
...Respondents/Complainant No. 1 to 3
Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the lll Addl chief Judicial I\,4agrstrate Nampally, Hyderabad to dispose of the
CC.No.6412 ol 2O21 in FlR.No.609 of 2019 with in 8 weeks This; Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the ltilemorandum of Grounds of Crimin al Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sfl Sridhar Lonkala, Advocate on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and of None appeared for the Respondent Nos. 2 to
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTTCE J.SREENIVAS RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.15795 of 2026
CNR.No. HBHC010671 652026
Date:28.09.2026
Between:
P.Jaya Prasad Raja
...Petitioner
AND
The State ofTelangana, and 3 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order
This Criminal Petition is fiied seeking to direct the learned III Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, to dispose of C.C.No.6412 of 2021 within eight weeks
2. Heard Mr.Sridhar Lonkala, leamed counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Jithender Rao Veeramalla, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent No. 1 .
3. Notice in respect of respondent Nos.2 to 4 is dispensed with solely on the ground that the petitioner has filed the present petition seeking disposal of C.C.No.6412 of 2021, and he is not seeking any - relef against respondent Nos.2 to 4, AS they are only proforma respondents
4. l-earned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner Iodged a complaint on 05.08.2019 against respondent Nos.2 to 4 and based on the complaint, Crime No. 609 of 2019 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 423, 17'7 and 181 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, 'lPC'). The lnvestigating Officer, after conducting the investigation, filed the final report before the Iearned trial Cour1, and the leamed trial Court took cognizance on 27.1)3.2021 and numbered the case as C.C.No.64l2 of 2021 . He further submitted that petitioner is de-facto complainant in the said C.C. He further submitted rhat respondent Nos.2 to 4, with an intention to protract the litigation, have been filing one application after another. I{espondent Nos.2 to 4 filed an application seeking their discharge from the above said offences,, and the said application has been pending since 17.10.2022. The learned trial Court has been adjc,urnin-e the case one way or the other at the instance of respondent Nos.2 to 4 and has not decided the said application, though the prosecution has expressed its readiness and willingness to proceed with the matter. Unless this Court issues necessary directions to the -w leamed trial Court to dispose of the application filed by respondent Nos.2 to 4 and further directs the leamed trial Court to conduct the trial and dispose of C.C.No.6412 of 2021 as expeditiously as possible, the petitioner will be put to great hardship.
5. Per contra, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that several cases are pending before the trial Court and the petitioner is not entitled to seek fixation of a time limit for disposal of C.C.No.6412 of 2021.
6. Having considered the rival submissions made by the respective parties and upon perusal of the material available on record, it reveals that the petitioner is the de-facto complainant in C.C.No.64i2 of 2021 and is a senior citizen. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are also senior citizens. The trial Court took cognizance of the case as early as in the year 2021. Even according to the learned counsel, the application filed by respondent Nos.2 to 4 seeking discharge flom the aforesaid offences is pending
7. Taking into consideration the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, the learned III Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad, is directed to dispose of the application fi1ed - by respondent Nos.2 to 4 as expeditiously as possible and also to conclude the trial and dispose of C.C.No.6412 of 2021 as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that the parties in /rs shall cooperate r.vith the trial Courl in disposing of C.C.No. 6412 of 2021 without seeking unnecessary adjournments. The petitioner is granted liberty to renew his request for fixation of a time limit, whenever the cause anses.
8. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed ot. Misccllaneous applications, pending ifany, shall stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SD/- B. REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To,
/, q t+il "
The lJl Addrtional Chref Judicial lr,4agistrate Nampally, Hyderabad Tht-. Station House Officer, Police Statron SR Nagar. Hyderabad District. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, al Hyderabad (OUT) On-. CC to Srl Srrdhar Lonkala, Advocate topUCl Twc CD Copies -DL C\K
HIGH COURT DATED: 2810912026
ORDER
CRLP.No.15795 of 2026 oR k DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION 1HE s 14 14. J iJ 08 oci (,:) ti Vt \li, ( I
6. \ ii) 1