Telangana High Court
WP/32372/2026 of Mohammed Abdullah Vs The State of Telangana on 28 September 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI WRIT PETITION No :32372 OF 2026 [ 321e 1 ...PETITIONER Between: AND Mohammed Abdullah,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVI DEVI
WRIT PETITION No:32372 OF 2026
[ 321e 1
...PETITIONER
Between:
AND
Mohammed Abdullah, son of Mohammed Salim Khan, Aged about 34 years, occupation business, resident of H.No. 6-9-14131611 , plot No. 14, pillar No. 270, Sridevi Colony, Shivrampally, Attapur, K.V.Ranga Reddy, Telangana - 500048.
'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep. by its principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad Telangana State.
2. The Station of House Officer, Banjara Hills police Station, Hyderabad- 500034, Telangana State.
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jubilee Hills Zone, A.Guards, Hyderabad, Telangana.
4. The Commissioner of Police, Hyderabad Road No. 12, Bhavani Nagar, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad, Telangana 500034.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction more, particularly in the nature of writ mandamus by declaring the action of Respondents for summoning the petitioner at un godly hours to the Police station, making him stay for long hours and forcing him to enter into a compromise, for acting as recovery agents as violation of her fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of lndia and direct a Respondents not harass the Petitioner.
LA. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd Respondent and Respondent No. 3 not to summon/ call and/or force the petitioner to enter into an unusual transaction basing of alleged oral complaint pending disposal of the presenl writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. SYED HASSAN BIN TAHER
Counsel forthe Respondents: SRI D.PRADEEP, AGP FOR HOME
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SMT.JUSTICE TANGIRALA MADHAVT DEVI
WRIT PETITION No.32372 of 2026
(CNR No. HBHC010661 552026)
DATE:28.09.2026
Between:
Mohammed Abdullah
Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana and others
Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
:: ORDER::
Alleging that respondents Nos.2 and 3 are entertaining oral complaints of money disputes and are pressuring the petitioner to compromise or make the payment, failing which the petitioner would be implicated in a criminal case, this writ petition has been filed.
2. Heard Mr. Syed Hassan Bin Taher, learned cor.rnsel for the petitioner, and Sri D. Pradeep, learned Assistant Government pleader for Home, appearing for respondents Nos.l to 4.
TMD,J wP 32312 2026
3. The leamed Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, submitted that on 12.09.2026, one Deepti Tammali, resident of Banjara Hills, submitted a complaint to respondent No.2 stating that an amount of Rs.5,54,450/-, including interest, was due and payable to her by the petitioner and that, despite her repeated requests and follow-ups, the petitioner has not paid the said amount. It is submitted that the petitioner was called to the police station only for the purpose of making enquiries, but the petitioner did not appear and is not cooperating with the enquiry. It is further submitted that, after the enquiry, action will be taken in accordance with law. A copy of the complaint submitted by Deepti Tammali is also enclosed along with the written instructions.
4. In view of the same, this Court finds that there is a dispute with regard to payment ofmoney. As such, the respondent police are directed not to call the petitioner to the police station for settlement of a money dispute and shall take action on the complaint of Ms.Deepti strictly in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs
/TTRUE COPY// TMD,] wP 32372 2026 SD/.G. ESWAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER
Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending shall stand closed' To, b
1. The Principal Secretary' Home Department' Secretariat Buildings' Hyderabad Telangana State'
2. The Station of House Officer' Banjara Hills Police Station' Hyderabad- 500034' Telangana State'
3. The Deputy Commissioner of Police' Jubilee Hills Zone' A Guards' Hyderabad' Telangana.
4. The Commissioner of Police' Hyderabad Road No 12' Bhavani Nagar' Baniara
- HiiL, nvo"tabad' Telangana 500034
5. One CC to SRI SYED HASSAN BIN TAHER' Advocate [OPUC]
6. Two CCs to GP FOR HOME' High Courtforthe State of Telangana' at Hyderabad lourl
7. Two CD CoPies PMK
HIGH COURT DATED: 2810912026
ORDER
WP.No.32372 o12026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS t\ 1L ,i./-- .Nr\ $\ o I l- 6l F ^F* 1$ t!r , o ot'