Telangana High Court
CRLRC/850/2022 of M.Venkatesh Vs The State of Telangana and 2 others on 24 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO : PRESENT: Between: lvl.Venkatesh S/o Late tvl.Yellappa ... Petitio ner/ Petitio n e r (Petitioner in CRLRC 850 OF 2022 on the file of Hlgh Court) AND l The State of
[ 32s1 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
: PRESENT:
Between:
lvl.Venkatesh S/o Late tvl.Yellappa
... Petitio ner/ Petitio n e r
(Petitioner in CRLRC 850 OF 2022
on the file of Hlgh Court)
AND
l
The State of Telangana, rep by The Public Prosecutor, High Court at llyderabad.
Smt.lvl.layanthi, W/o Venkatesh, Occ. Pvt. Service, Kum.Adyvaitha, D/o Venkatesh Aged about 2 years, Being minor represented by her mother and Natural guardian (Respondent No.1)
Both R/o H.No.4-6-137131, Sai Nagar, Moosapet, Hyderabad.
... Respo nde nts/ Respon d e nts
(Respondents in-do- )
Petition under Section 397 (1) of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of ordcr dated 291LL12022 in Crl.M.P.No.B44/2021 in M.C.No.62l2021 on the file of the Iil Additional District Sessions Judge-cum-ll Additional lvletropolitan sessions ludge-cum-Family Court, lvledchal-Malkajgifi District at Kukatpally pending disposal of CRLRC No.850 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.
The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondent No.2 herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order.(The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case ).
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Issue notice to the respondent Nos.2 and 3. The petitioner shall pay maintenance of Rs.2O,00O/- to 1't petitioner and Rs.15,OOO/- to 2"4 petitioner total Rs.35,OOO/- to the wife and daughter who are respondent Nos,2 and 3 pending disposal of the case. l THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER IA No. 1 OF 2022 IN CRLRC NO: 850 OF 2022 Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI S. RAM REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Half of the arrears shall be paid within two months from the date of receipt of this order. The remaining half of arrears is subject to the future of the case, Needless to say the arrears shall be calculated for an amount of Rs.35,O00/- to both the respondents which is now ordered. SD/. N ASSIS .9H rAN ANDRASHEKAR RAO To, T REGI TRAR / /TRUE coPY / / SECTION FFICER
1. The III Additional District Sessiens Judge-cum-II Additional Metropolitan Sessions J udge-cum- Fa mily Court, Medchal-Malkajgifi District at Kukatpally
2. Smt.M.Jayanthi, W/o Venkatesh, Occ. Pvt. Service, R/o H.No.4-6-737137, Sai Nagar, Moosapet, Hyderabad. (for self and on behalf of respondent No.2, viz. Kum.Adyvaitha, D/o Venkatesh, being minor) (By RPAD)
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad (OUT)
4. One CC to Sri S. Ram Reddy Advocate [OPUCJ 5, One spare copy i
J HIGH COURT KSJ DATED:161 12/ 2022
ORDER
IA No.1 of 2O22 In CRLRC.No.850 ol 2022 DIRECTION a ATc Er pL t F o L b C:. U' iu) i' ,.] 'l_.' ,</ !. Da