CC/2695/2023 of Alla Kondal Reddy, Vs Smt. Yachamaneni @ Boinpally Nirosha, on 24 September 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

AND

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

l.A. No. I ol 2024

IN

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2695OF 2023

Between:

AND

1. Alla Kondal Reddy, S/o. Ram Reddy, Aged about 56 years, Occ Business, R/o. H.No.6-2512, Cherlabathkur Village, Karimnagar Mandal and District.

2. Nampelli Rani, W/o. Nagarjuna Chary, Aged about 45 years Occ. House wife, R/o. H.No. 8-4-18111, Ganeshnagar, Karimnagar Townand District

...Petitioners/Contempt Petitioners/

Respondent No. 11 and

Respondent No. 3 in

Writ Petition No. 26233 of 2023

Smt. Yachamaneni @ Boinpally Nirosha,, Wo. BoinpallyAbyudaya, Aged about 32 years, Occ. Housewife, Rl/. H.NO. 7-4-19913/3, Jagithyal Town and District 505327.

Smt. Yachamaneni @ Annamaneni Niharika, Wo. Annamaneni Prakash Rao, aged about 57 years, Occ. Business, H.No. 2-4713/3, Seetharampur Village, Karimnagar, Karimnagar District.

...Contemnors/

Respondents/

Petitioners in No.-26233 of 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to recall/revive the Contempt Case No. 2695 of 2023 and enquire into the issue and A.F

punish the Respondents under section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Court*for their willful disobedience of this Court's final order dated 1911212023 in Contempt Case No. 2695 of 2023 and for their willful disobedience and wanton violation of this Court's order dated 1511112023 in lA.No. 2 of 2023 in Writ Petition No.26223

,:l

,/'

of 2023 and further acting contrary to their undertaking as recorded in the court,s /

final order dated 19112/2023 jn Contempt Case No. 2695 of 2023.

Counsel for the petitioners : Mr. y Rama Rao and Associates Counsel for the Respondents : Ms. Ramani Vemuganti The Court made the fo owing:

r'A-No 1 0f 2024 has been fired for restoration of contempt case No.26g5 0f

2023.

This Bench on 19.12.2023 had disposed of the contempt case then on a specific undertaking given by the respondents and their counsel thal they shall ensure maintaining status quo as it existed on 19.12.2023. rt was arso made crear that in the event if the said order was not honoured, the petitioners wourd be at liberty at get the contempt case revived. The interim order of stalus quo that was granted by this court was on 15 11.2023 in r.A.No.2 0f 2023 in w.p.No.26223 0f 2023 The said writ petition was fired by the respondents/contem nors questioning the Lok Adarat set'emenuaward that was arrived at. The said wrt pet*ion finary went against the respondents/contemnors vide judgment dated 27.01 .2025. rn spite of the respondents/contemnors rosing in the writ petition paying no heed to the undertaking given to the court and atso in utter vioration of the order of status quo granted in the writ petition, the respondents/contemnors have proceeded with the conskuction over the subject premises and have now went on to comprete the entire construction activity itserf rhis aspect is not disputed by the rearned counser appearing for the respondenls/ contemnors. The only explanation he tries to give is that whatever construcrion that has taken prace is after the dismissar of the writ petition that the respondents have fired and since the writ petition was not pending, it wourd not fa, within the purview of contempt of courts Act. The aforesaid contention of the petitioners prima facie refrects of an acceptance of having carried on with the construction subsequent to the interim order granted by this court and even after the respondents having rost in the writ petition that they had fired. Hence, we are of the considered opinion that a strong case for revivar of the contempt case has been made out.

Accordingly, l.A.No.1 of 2024 stands allowed restored to its original number.

C.C-No-2695 of 2023 stands

//TRUE COPY//

sd/- A.V.S.S.C.S.M. SARMA

JOINT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

l The section officer, oS section, High court for the State of rerangana at Hyderabad.

2 9Tt;I:.9!3r.an9ni @ Boinpaily Nirosha,, Wo. BoinpailyAbyudaya, Ry. H.NO

^

7-4-19913t3, Jagithyat Town and District 505327. (Bf Speed post)

3 9TI Yach-amaneni @ Annamaneni Niharika, Wo. innamaneni prakash Rao, H.No. 2-47/313. Seetharampur Village, Karimnagar, Karimnagar Oisirict 1E-y Speed Post)

4. One CC to Mr. Y Rama Rao and Associates tOpUCI

5. One CC to [\4s. Ramani Vemuganti, Advocate [OPUC]

6. Two CD Copies

DL

Yy

HIGH COURT

DATED:1 1l0gl2025

LlsT oN 25.09.2025