Telangana High Court
WP/32333/2026 of N. Venkateshwar Vs The State of Telangana on 24 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 32333 OF 2026 Between: N. Venkateshwar, S/o. Late Sripathi Rao,
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 32333 OF 2026
Between:
N. Venkateshwar, S/o. Late Sripathi Rao, Aged about 52 years, Occ; Business, Rl/o. Flat No. 3-6-6, Sriram Mohalla , Zaheerabad.
.....PETITIONER
AND
'1 . The State of Telangana, Rep 9y its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Telangana.
2. The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. Zaheerabad Municipality, Rep by its Commissioner, Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
4. The Town Planning Officer, Zaheerabad Municipality, Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition Under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of Respondents, more particularly Respondent Nos.3 and 4, in trying to interfere with the Petitioner's possession of and demolish a portion of the subject property, under an alleged road-widening programme without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 300-4 of the Constitution of lndia; and consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner's possession over the subject property without following due procedure of law.
|.A.NO:1 OF 2026
Petition Under Section 151 CPC praying that in the cirr:umstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to interfere with the Petitioner's possession over the subject property without following due process of law, pending disposal of the writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI ABHISHEK, COUNSEL REPRESENTING
Ms. G.VARSHA
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : G.P FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.2 to 4 : SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR
MUNICIPALITIES
The Court made the following ORDER
IN THE HIGH COI]RT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAI)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY
WRIT PETITON No.32333o8 2026
CNR No.HBIIC0I 0666142026
DATE|24-09-2026
Between:
Mr. N. Venkateshwar
... Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana
Rep. By its Principal Secretary,
Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, and others.
.. ResPondents
ORDER: (ORAL)
Heard Nft. Abhishek, learned counsel, representing Ms. G. Varsha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr' Putta Krishna Reddy, leamed standing counsel for Municipalities appearing for respondent Nos.3 and 4.
2.
Leamed standing counsel for respondent Nos'3 and 4
submitted that due process of law will be followed by respondent authorities if the property of the petitioner bearing H'No'3-6-61
admeasuring 91 square yards situated at Hanuman Mandir Road'
.E
\To
BVR,J
W.P. No 32333 of 2026
Zaheerabad,, Sanga Reddy District, is acquired for widening of 40'-00' road from railway station to old NH-9 Bhavani Mandir Road in Zaheerabad.
3.
Recording the submission of leamed standing counsel for respondent Nos.3 and 4, the writ petition is dispos,ed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the writ petition stand closed SD/- A.JAYASREE
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat, State of Telangana at HyderaL)ad, Telangana.
2. The Commissioner and Director of Municipal Adminislration, Government of Telangana, Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner, Zaheerabad Municipality, Zaheerabad, Sangareddy Distnct, Telangana.
4. The Town Planning Officer, Zaheerabad Municipality, Zaheerabad, Sangareddy District, Telangana.
5. Two CCs to G.P FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
6. One CC to Ms. G.VARSHA, Advocate (OPUC)
T One CC to SRI PUTTA KRISHNA REDDY, SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES
loPUCl
8. Two CD Copies
SA
W
PSK
C.C. TODAY
HIGH COURT
DATED: 2410912026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
WP.No.32333 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE W.P WITHOUT COSTS. 1 y.E SrAr6- 2 4 sEP 2026 '(. :, ./ \ (\ :/' \