Telangana High Court
WP/32031/2026 of Kandala Anantha Padmanabha Yeshwanth, Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2026
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32031 OF 2026 (CNR No.HBHC010658302026) Dated: 23.09.2026 Between: Kandala Anantha Padmanabha Yeshwanth, S/o.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.32031 OF 2026
(CNR No.HBHC010658302026)
Dated: 23.09.2026
Between:
Kandala Anantha Padmanabha Yeshwanth,
S/o. Kandala Durga Surya Viswanadh
… Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,
Represented by its Principal Secretary,
Medical & Health Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 055 and another …Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr. L. Ram Singh, learned counsel appears for the petitioner.
Mr. R. Nagarjuna Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department, appears for respondent No.1.
Mr. T. Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, appears for respondent No.2.
2. This Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner request for exercising web options for admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota “B” and “C” Category in next phase of counselling for the academic year 2026-27 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider and permit the petitioner for exercising web options for admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota “B” and “C” category for the academic year 2026-27 in next phase of counselling and pass such order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner could not deposit the requisite amount within the time stipulated for admission into MBBS course for the academic year 2026-27, due to financial hardship. He further submitted that the petitioner preferred a representation before respondent No.2-University on 21.09.2026, but the same has not yet been considered. He further submitted that respondent No.2-University be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-University submitted that the petitioner’s representation shall be dealt with by respondent No.2-University in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2-University to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 21.09.2026 as per the grounds taken in it and in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ
__________________________________ VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, J Date: 23.09.2026 MD