Telangana High Court
WP/31903/2026 of Aditya Kumar Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRlT PETITION
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
The Hon’ble The Chief Justice Sri Aparesh Kumar Singh
and
The Hon’ble Sri Justice Vakiti Ramakrishna Reddy Writ Petition No.31903 of 2026
(CNR No. HBHC010656592026)
Dated: 23.09.2026
Between:
Aditya Kumar,
S/o. Sanjay Kumar
...Petitioner
and
The State of Telangana,
represented by its Principal Secretary,
Medical and Health, Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and another …Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr. L. Ram Singh, learned counsel appears for the petitioner.
Mr. R.Nagarjuna Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Health, Medical and Family Welfare Department appears for respondent No.1.
Mr. T. Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, appears for respondent No.2.
2. This Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “...issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner for counselling and admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management
::2:: Quota “C” NRI Quota seat in ongoing phase or next phase of counselling for the academic year 2026-27 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider and include the name of the petitioner for admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota “C” NRI Quota Seat for the academic year 2026-27 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner had applied for online registration under Management Quota ‘B’ and ‘C’ categories, due to inadvertence, he could not upload the requisite documents for consideration under C/NRI category, within the stipulated time, as a result of which he could not complete the registration formalities under the said category. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner preferred a representation before respondent No.2-University on 20.09.2026 to permit him to register under Management Quota C/NRI category, but the same has not yet been considered. He further submitted that respondent No.2- University be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.2-University submitted that the petitioner’s representation shall be dealt with by respondent No.2-University in accordance with law.
::3::
5. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition is disposed of directing respondent No.2-University to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 20.09.2026 as per the grounds taken in it and in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand closed.
____________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ
________________________________ VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, J Date: 23.09.2026 LUR