Telangana High Court

WP/32010/2026 of D.Parvesh Raj Vs Union of India on 23 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32010 OF 2026 (CNR No.HBHC010654842026) Dated: 23.09.2026 Between: D. Parvesh Raj S/o. J. Darma Raj …

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH

AND

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

WRIT PETITION No.32010 OF 2026

(CNR No.HBHC010654842026)

Dated: 23.09.2026

Between:

D. Parvesh Raj S/o. J. Darma Raj

… Petitioner

And

Union of India,

Rep. by its Secretary,

Ministry of Health and Family Welfare,

Nirman Bhavan, New Delhi and five others …Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Mr. R. Rama Krishna, learned counsel represents M/s. JMS Law firm, learned counsel for the petitioner, through video conferencing.

Mr. T. Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, appears for respondent No.6.

2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the Writ Petition is heard finally.

3. This Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus Directing Respondent No.6 to consider the petitioner vide Roll No. 4219104109, Application No.260410199036, NEET ALL INDIA RANK-916121, under the PwDB Disability in accordance with the Rules of National Medical Commission and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had appeared for NEET UG-2026 examination and secured All India Rank of 916121 and he belongs to SC category. Petitioner had appeared for the Person with Benchmark Disability (PwBD) verification for assessment on 14.08.2026 at NIMS Hospital, Hyderabad, and submitted the required documents for admission to M.B.B.S. course for the academic year 2026-27. Respondent No.6-University has issued the list of Ineligible Candidates on 25.08.2026, wherein the name of the petitioner was shown and he was not considered as PwBD. Petitioner also appeared before the Appellate Authority i.e., Appellate Medical Board, Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital, Chennai-3 on 02.09.2026 and submitted all documents, but they refused to conduct the evaluations and he was declared as ineligible under PwBD category. Learned counsel further submits that respondent No.6- University had informed that the reason for not considering the application of the petitioner under PwBD Category is that he had not opted the reservation under PwBD disability. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioner would file a representation and respondent No.6-University be directed to decide the same in a time bound manner.

5. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent No.6-University submits that in case the petitioner submits a representation, the same shall be dealt with by respondent No.6-University in accordance with law.

6. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation to respondent No.6- University with regard to his grievance. In case, such a representation is made, respondent No.6-University shall decide the same, in accordance with law, and pass a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ

__________________________________ VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, J

Date: 23.09.2026 MD

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead