Telangana High Court
WP/32120/2026 of Balamoni Srinidhi, Vs The State of Telangana on 23 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF SRI JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY WRIT PETITION
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI APARESH KUMAR SINGH
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.32120 OF 2026
(CNR No.HBHC010662012026)
Dated: 23.09.2026
Between:
Balamoni Srinidhi, D/o. B. Sandeep Kumar … Petitioner
And
The State of Telangana,
Represented by its Principal Secretary,
Medical & Health Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 055 and another …Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Mr. L. Ram Singh, learned counsel represents Mr. Y. Anjaneyulu, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. T. Sharath, learned Standing Counsel for Kaloji Narayana Rao University of Health Sciences, appears for respondent No.2.
2. This Writ Petition is filed for the following relief: “... to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioners daughter request for online registration for admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota “C/NRI” Category in ongoing & next phase of counseling for the academic year 2026-27 as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to consider and permit the petitioner daughter to upload online application for admission into MBBS/BDS course under Management Quota “C” NRI” category for the academic year 2026-27 in ongoing & next phase of counseling and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had registered under “B” category for admission into MBBS/BDS course for the academic year 2026-27, but inadvertently she could not register under “C” category i.e., NRI Category, as she could not get sponsor letter and NRI documents. He submits that the petitioner preferred a representation through e-mail to the respondent-University on 21.09.2026 to consider her candidature under ‘C’ Category, but the same has not yet been considered. He further submits that the respondent-University be directed to decide the said representation in a time bound manner.
4. Learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-University submits that the petitioner’s representation shall be dealt with by the respondent-University in accordance with law.
5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondent-University to decide the petitioner’s representation dated 21.09.2026 as per the grounds taken in it and in accordance with law, by passing a reasoned order before the next counselling. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________________ APARESH KUMAR SINGH, CJ
__________________________________ VAKITI RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, J Date: 23.09.2026 MD