Telangana High Court
WP/8030/2022 of Sirisala Naga Lakshmi Vs The State of Telangana and 5 others on 7 September 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 8030 OF 2022 Between: Sirisala Naga Lakshmi, D/o Eedaiah, aged
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 8030 OF 2022
Between:
Sirisala Naga Lakshmi, D/o Eedaiah, aged about 31 years, Occ: Agriculture, Rl/o Kethepalli Village, Nampalli Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Building, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
3. The District Panchayat Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
4. The Tahsildar, Kondampallepalli Mandal, Nalgonda District.
5. The Panchayat Secretary, Kondampallepalli Mandal, Nalgonda District.
6. Sarpanch, Kondamallepalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
...Respondents
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.5 in interfering into peaceful possession of the petitioner for the plot in Sy.No.1 17 ' 1171E' 117lEE'
1171U,117tA, 117tN6,1171N3, 1171N4 admeasuring (133.33) Sq. yards situated at Kondamallepalli Village, Kondamallepalli Mandal, Nalgonda District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6 is highly iltegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, unjust and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and also in violation of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of lndia and consequently direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into peaceful possession of the petitioner for the plot in Sy.No.117, 1171E, 117lEE, 117|U,11714, 1171N6, 1171A13, 117lAl4 admeasuring (133.33) Sq. yards situated at Kondamallepalli Village, Kondamallepalli Mandal, Nalgonda District, without issuing any notice and without following due process of law, by colluding with the respondent No.6.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2022
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.5 not to interfere into peaceful possession of the petitioner for the plot in Sy No.1 17, 1171E., 117lEE, 117lU, 1171A, 1171N6, 1171A13, 117lAl4 admeasuring (133.33) Sq yards situated at Kondamaltepalli Village, Kondamallepalli Mandal, Nalgonda District pending disposal of the writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Rapolu Bhaskar Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : AGP For Panchayat Raj & Rural Dev Counsel for the Respondent Nos.3, 5 & 6 : Sri. Pradeep Reddy Katta, Standing Counsel lorZPP, MPP, & GPP.
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 & 4: GP for Revenue The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
DATE: 07.09.2026
WRIT PETITION No.8030 of 2022
CNR.No. HBHCO10 100992022
Between:
Sirisala Naga Lakshmi
.. .Petitioner
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary,
Panchayat Raj Department,
Secretariat Building,
Secretariat, Hyderabad and 5 others.
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
The present Writ Petition has been filed seeking direction lo issue a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Sth respondent in interfering with the petitioner,s peaceful possession and enjoyment of the subject property, without notice and without following due process of law, as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles '14 and 300-4 of the Consttution of lndia, and l RRIV,J W.P.No-8030 of 2022 consequently, 'direct the 5th respondent not to interfere with the petitionef s possession except in accordance with law
2. Heard Sri Rapglu Bhaskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Ral and Rural Development Department, appearing for respondent No.. and Sri Pradeep Reddy Katta, learned Standing Counsel for Zilla Praja Parishads, Mandal Praja Parishads and Gram Panchayats, appearing for respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6. Perused the record.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the laMul owner and possessor of the subject propefty admeasuring 133.33 sq. yards, having purchased the same under registered Sale Deed Document No.2603 of 2021 , dated 19.02.2021 . and has been in peaceful possession and enjoyment thereof ever since
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the 61h respondent, being the Sarpanch, demanded that the petitioner to sell the property to him at a lower price and, upon her refusal, allegedly instrgated the 5th respondent to interfere with her
RRN,J W.P.No.8030 of 2022 possession. Despite having no lawful authority over the petitioner's patta land, the 5th respondent, through Gram Panchayat staff, repeatedly interfered with her possession and threatened her with dispossession.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner approached the concerned authorities and submitted representations seeking protection of her possession, but no effective action has been taken. Hence, the present Writ Petition.
6. Learned Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.3, 5 and 6 submits that the respondents would not interfere with the petitioner's possession except in accordance with law and that due process would be followed. Hence, prayed to dispose of the writ petition accordingly.
7. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of directing the respondents not to interfere with the petitioner's subject property. lf authorities wants to acquire petitioner's land for any purpose, follow due process of law. No order as to costs.
.+ RRN,J W.P-No.8030 of 2022 As a sequel. miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// SD/- AHMED ABDULLA KHAN ASSISTANT RE9ETRAR ("- To, t,^ '.11) PSR SECTION OFFICER 1, The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Secretariat Building' Secretartat, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.
2. The District Collector, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District.
3. The District Panchayat Officer, Nalgonda, Nalgonda District
4. The Tahsildar, Kondampallepalli IVlandal, Nalgonda District.
5. The Panchayat Secretary, Kondampallepalli Mandal, Nalgonda District.
6. Sarpanch, Kondamallepalli Village and Mandal, Nalgonda District.
7. One CC to SRI RAPOLU BHASKAR, Advocate [OPUC] B. Two CCs to GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEV, High Court for the State ofTelangana, at Hyderabad [OUI
9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
10. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATE D : 07 10912026
ORDER
WP.No.8030 of 2022 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS. CC TODAY *h 'I i, fl 'i i: t\ O5.q, ';.r'irr
* S TA e r H
e t oo l, a 11SEP2 .i)