AS/128/2009 of N.Hanumanth Reddy Vs N.Bhoomi Reddy on 7 September 2026

JUDGMENT

AS.No.128 of 2009 .J 11Stl' o i DESf:g-{ .ry 5TATE o TS

+ C DISPOSING OF THE APPEAL SUIT IN TERMS OF JOINT MEMO OF COMPROMISE WITHOUT COSTS @w^ t1 [a lra i'

IN THE HIGH COI'RT OF JrUPTCITURE FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA, AT :: IIIDERABAD A.S.No. t2A OF 2009 Between: Naram Hanumantha Reddy, S/o Late Naram Linga Reddy, Aged 79 years, Occ: Retired Govt Employee, R/o. Flat no.G-1O, B-Block, Giridhari Avigna Apts, Bandlagudaj agir, near times international school, Gandipet, R.R.District, Telangana. AND

1. Late N.Bhoomi Reddy (Died Issueless)

2. Naram Venkat Reddy, S/o. Late Linga Reddy, (died) (LR's No.3 to 8 are on record)

3. NARAM VASANTHA W / O. Late. N. Raghunath Reddy Aged about :48 Yrs, Occ:House wife, R/ o.H.No. 1- 1 1 5, Kismathpur Village, Gandipet Mandal, R,R,District.

4. N.SREF^IA D/o. Late N. Raghunath Reddy Aged about :23 Yrs, Occ:Student, R/ o.H.No. 1- 1 15, Kismathpur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R,R,District. [\ V^8o.4"Jh.^- RESP'OIVDEJYT lVO.3 ( Uor,a1 ^, r'. :: I rvo.6 Appellant / Defendant no.2 Respondent no.1 / / Plaintiff .....Respondent no.2 I Defendant no. 1 |Sr?\yP.Yi RESP'O IDEfl:rlVO.4 (i.r ' .'c..,-.: ,KO RESP'O.lvDElYf JVO.s ^9 e, RESPOilDEI\rr ffO.7 ;;Hsl RES.PO]VDEIYT,MO.A N llPaRe

5. N.Sainath Reddy, S/o. Late N. Raghunath Reddy Aged about :20 Yrs, Occ:Student, R/o.H.No. 1 115, Kismathpur Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R,R,District.

6. N.Yadamma W/o. Late N.Venkat Reddy, aged:71Yrs, Occ: House-Wife, R/o. H.No. i-115, Kismathpur Village, Rajendrangar (M), R.R.Districr. T"langana. (Impleaded the Respondent no.3 to Respondent no.6 as per this Hon'ble Court order date-d: 01.O4.2O21uide I.A.No. O1 of 2021inA.S.No. 128 of 2oo9) .........Respondent no.3 TO 6/ Respondent no.3 TO 6

7. L.Neelavathi alias Leelavalhi, D/o. Late N.Venkat Reddy, aged: 60 Yrs, Occ: House-Wife, R/o. H.No. 1 134, Pedda Amberpet, Hal'athnagar, R. R. District, Telangana.

8. M.Manemma, D/o. Late N.Vcnkat Reddy, aged: 47 Yrs, C)cc: House-Wife, R/o. H.No. 9-2-248, Pensionpura, Lunger House, Hyderabad. (Respondent No's 7 & 8 are brought on record as Legal Representatiues of Respondenl No.2 as per this Hon'ble court order dated: O1.O7.2O24 uide I.A.No. 5 of 2024 in A.S.No. 128 of 2009) .........Respondent no.7 & 8/ Respondent no.7 & 8 \s. Va&i'ril'{1g- $i*A+t R,ESPO M.3 RESP'O IDE,l\,:r iVO.4 ,9u6@ ElYr ivo.s RES.PO

RESP'OJVDEMT IVO.7 \- \ r ^ -) ^l -- r)'ltfu (f.-\ R,ESPONDE.I\|T JVO.8 '( 2lPage

It is humbly submitted that, the present Appeal is arising from a Suit for Partition and Separate possession (being O.S.No. 2g3 of 1997 filed before I Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R.District, L.B.Nagar) frled by Late Mr.Naram Bhoomi Reddy, Son of Late Linga Reddy against his two brothers Naram Hanumanth Reddy, the Appellant herein and Late Naram Venkat Reddy, Respondent no.2 herein in respect of tJle properties detailed as Schedule A, B and C of tJ:e Suit schedule properties. In the Said suit, the Honble I Additiona-l Senior Civil Judge was pleased to pass t.Ile preliminary Judgement and decree dated 11.02.2O09 holding that the Respondent no.1 / Plaintiff herein was entitled to 1/3.d share in all the Suit Schedule ProperLies as the same are Joint properties held by the three brothers. Aggrieved by the said impugned preliminary judgement and decree dated 1 1.02.2009, the present appeal came to be filed before this Hon,ble Court, which is currently pending. It is humLrly submitted that, during pendency of the said appeal the parties entered into a joint cornpromise in the year 2027 vtde I.A.No. O2 of 2O2l and a common order was passed by this Hon'ble Court on dated: 08.04.2021, as the terms of compromise were faiied between the parties, the parties once again agitated the litigation among themselves and hled several cases against each other and in that process, the appellant herein frled a recall petition vide l.A.No. 02 ol 2024 in the said Appeal suit, to recall the order dated: O8.O4.2021 passed in I.A.No. 02 of 2O2l tn

.A,M- N VdorD[,t4cL RESPOJVDEJYT JVO.3

r)./k\^eg RESPONDE.MT iVO.4 ,l9 ur6 d RESPOJVDEMT,MO. T lvo.s *tr€4 RESFO.IVDE]VT lvo.8 3lPaRc $ BY

A. S. No Court A.S.No o.s.No.330 /2022 Renumbered AS O.S.No.200,/

o.s.No.393 /

Renumbered as o.S.No. 856 i

N.Vasantha & another N. Hanumant ha Reddy HON'BLE COURT I AddI SCJ, RR Distr-ict - Now at Rajendranag ar court II AddI SCJ, RR District - Now at Rajendranag ar court II AddI District Judge, RR District Now before X 1\DJ, Rajendrar.rag ar court. PRESENT STATUS NOT PRESSED I DT:II.O2.2Q26 NOT PRESSED DT:1.1.O2.2026 NOT PRESSED DT:09.03.2026

728 of 2009 , and the same was allowed by this Hon,ble on 16.7O .2024 and q6661clingly tht: said appeal suit 728 of 2OO9 is restored to file. It is humbly submitted that, on intervention made by the elders and well-wlshers of both the parties, pending disputes among the family members with respect to Schedule. A ( 3 properties), Schedule-B and Schedule-C properties is settled amicably out of the Hon'ble Court and accordingly the below mentioned cases were withdraivn as "NOT PRESSED", and in O.S.No. 775 of 2O2O (New O.S.No. 939 of 2025) on the file of the Addl Senior Civil Judge, Rajendranagar, R.R.District, the parties entered into a Joint Compromise and obtained Consent decree on 17 .O7 .2C.26 S cAsE No PLAINTIFF DEFEI{DANT

NO

N.\'asantha & another N.Hanumant ha Reddy o.s.No. 1693 /2022 N.Venkat Reddy & 3 others M/s. NRR Construction s & 2 others *I J"U^,*to- $ *ae.Hq RESPOA'DEJYT IVd. J\IO.3 RE rn 6I .5

o"*io{,# *3 R,ESFONDENT NO.8 W 4jPaHe

PRESENT STATUS I Addl SCJ, RR District now at Raj endranag ar court Addl Senior Civil Judge, Raj endranag ar NOT PRESSED DT:03.03.2026 OBTAINED CONSENT DECREE DT:77 .O7 .2026

x Addl District Judge, Rajendranag ar PENDING It is humbly submitted that, narration in brief is that, appellant (N.Hanumanttra Reddy) is the absolute owner arrd peaceful possessor of land in Sy.No. 29/ 1/AA, admeasuring Ac.3.22 Gts, Bandlagudajagir Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, R.R.District, Telangana, (Schedule C property) obtained through partition deed dated: 06.02.1983 arrd got mutated his name in revenue records vide proceedings no. ROR/62|89, dated: O5.O2.199O and obtained Pattadhar passbook no. 1g369g and title deed no.230491, with patta no. 50 issued by the Mandal Revenue $J vaSc(,u$T- RESP'ONDEIYT lvo.a \\.44ahA,h RES.FOAIDE]\TT ATO:4 RE ivo.5 nebpornoerul,i:rvo.o "d ril:''' ,$adr0 RESPOJV,E]YT ]vO.7 nl*75 RESFO IDE [r]VO.8 s 5lPage s. I{o CASE IYO PLAII{TIFF DEFEITDANT E.P.NO. 132 / 2022 in o.s.No.28s /

renumbered as E.P.No. 15 /

N.Bhoomi Reddy N.Venkat Reddy others & HOlT'BLE COURT

o.s.No.307/

N. Srisailam & 4 others N.Vasantha & 8 Others VII AddI District Judge, RR District Now before X ADJ, Rajendranag ar NOT PRESSED DT:09.O2.2026

o.s.No.77s /

renumbered as O.S.No. 939 / 2O2s N.Hanuman tha Reddy N.Venkat Reddy and others o.s.No. 174 / 2024 Renumbered as O.S.No.1470 /2026 N.Hanuman tha Reddy & others N.Vasantha & 17 Others ofhcer, Rajendranagar and obtained Dharani prrttadhar passbook no. ,TOSO7O2OOOO8", with Kata no.So, datecl: 22 'O4 '2018 and accordingly the appellant is in peaceful possession and enjoyment of Schedule C property without any interference since 1983 to til1 date Itishumblysubmittedthat'asfarastheraisingoftitleis concerned originally the land was purchased by the appellalt with hishardearnedmoneyintheyearlg72andgotregisteredinthe name of his elder brother Late N. Bhoomi Recldy vide registered sale deed document -;,o. 146 of 7972, in Book-I volume no.10O, page 431 to 433 n'ith the ofllce of Sub-registrar' Hyderabad West and the appellant along with his two brothers i e' Iate N Bhoomi Redd1. and Late N.Venkat Reddy being the only sons of late Linga Redd1,. During the course of partition along with the ancestral properties and self-acquired properties, that is Schedule-A, Schedule-B and Schedule-C properties effected partition in the year 1983 through an un-registered document and accordingly the said Schedule - C property being a self-acquired ProPerty purchased by the appellant with his hard earned money accordingly on understanding between the brothers the same was allotted to appellant without having any objections from either of the parties and it is also pertinent to mention here that, all the three brothers that is Late N Bhoomi Reddy, N.Venkat Reddy and N.Hanumant Reddy (Appellarrt) signed the partiLion deed in which it is clearly mentioned that, the land in Sy.no.29/A, admeasuring Ac.3.22 Gts, Bandlagudajagir Village, Rajendranagar Mandal, falls to tlte share of N. Hanumant ReddY. \)?tilf€eLu N'vat"cla+ RES.PONDE]V:T,AIO.3 RE JVO.s RE .R gA9* *o., RESPOAIDEMT ATO.4

\/ ) ^-_) -l ^L ,,nil e"yJ_'- N RESPO]\TDEIYT ,IVO. A 6lPaee

It is humbly submitted that, after 14 years from the date of un_ registered partition deed, Late N.Bhoomi Reddy (plaintiff and elder brother of appellant) frled Suit for partition and separate possession in the year 1997, with respect to lald in Sy.no. 72, admeasuring Ac.3.18 gts and Sy.no. 69, admeasuring Ac. 2.OZ gts, of kismathpur village, mentioned as schedule - A property and a residential house bearing D.no. 1-54, is mentioned as schedule - B property and part of the land in present suit schedule property ttrat is land in Sy.no. 29 /AA, admeasuring Ac.3.22 gts was mentioned. as schedule -C property and tJ:e said suit was numbered as O.S.No. 283 of 1992 on the frle of the Hon'lcle I Addl Senior Civil Judge, R.R.District in which appellant herein is arrayed as defendant no.2 and Late N.Venkat Reddy is arrayed as defendant no. 1. It is humbly submitted that, late N.Bhoomi reddy left the partition suit O.S.No. 283 of 7997 , uncontested and having no representation the suit was dismissed for default on 08.03.2OO4 and later the appellant out of love ald affection executed a registered Gift settlement deed in favour of his wife N.Shylaja, vide document no. 2732 of 2008, dated: 15.07.2008, registered before the SRO, Gandipet, the same is revoked mutually by the parties vide document ro. 177 17 of 2025, dt: 13.10.2O25 and it is pertinent to mention here that, tate N.Bhoomi reddy who is plaintiff in O.S.No. 283 of 1997 took steps to restore the suit rphich was dismissed for default, and later Late N.Bhoomi Reddy and appellant herein contested the suit in which a preliminary Judgment and Decree was passed on Ll.O2.2OOg and while granting 1/3rd share to late N.Bhoomi Reddy. Challenging the said Judgment and Decree the appellant preferred t1-e present appeal. \t-Va&vlifl'b. l.tt"yeg RESPOIVDTIYT NO.s RESPOJVI,EJYT 'VO.4 "rdrB,#r4r,*.,

RESFO

mod-, RESFO]VDttur ilo.a TlPaRe N .ilro.6

ro It is humbly submitted that, Late N.Bhoomi Reddy who filed the partition suit vide O.S.No. 2a3 of 7997, as the suit was dismissed for default on dated: 08.03.2004, later after the suit was restored in the year 2008, to prolong the litigation Late N.Bhoomi Reddy executed registered ctocuments in favour Late N.Raghunath reddy (son of Late N.Venkat Reddy) and two other third parties, vide Wi-I] Deed document rJ.o.6l2OO4, dt.04.06.2004 & 17.06.2OO4; Gift Settlement deed, doct n. 597/2OO9, dt: 12.O3.2009; Agreement of Sale cum GPA", document no. 863/2009, dt:18.03.2009; Agreement of Sale cum GPA', document no. 86212OO9, dt:18.O3.2009, and Sale deed document no- 586212021, dt: 3o.03.2021, out of which will Deed document no. 6l2oO4, dt.04.06.2004 & 17.06.2004; Gift Settlement deed, doct no. 591/2009, dt: 12.03.2O09; Agreement of Sale cum GPA", document no. 86312OO9, dt:18.03.2009; and Sale deed document no.5a62/2027, dt: 30.O3.2021 were declared as null and void in O.S.No. 775 of 2020 (New O.S.No. 939 of 20251 by the Addl Senior Civil Judge, Rajendranagar, through a Joint Compromise entered between the parties and obtained Consent decree dated:17.07.2026, in the atrove O.S.No. 939 of 2025. It is humbly subrnitted that, in the year 2022 a1'tpellar.t along with his wife Smt N.Shylaja approached M/s. N.R.R.constructions, and executed registered Development agreement irr his favour with respect to the land admeasuring Ac.3.22 Gts in Sy.no.29/ 1/AA, vide registered DAGPA Doct no. 575 I 2022, dt: 02.12.2022, obtained NALA conversion order dated:28.01.2023, vide proceedings no.23OOO74435, and later executed Registered Ralification deed doct no. 7435012023, dt:22.77.2O23, and doct no.72/2O24, dt:03.O1.2024, executed by the daughters of appellalt that is

N V":",roVtrcX RE tvo.3 lr'V/k4nrhe-\ty RESPO]YdEIVT IVO.Z, tYo.5 NO,6 ,$ ao5 d RDSrcNDET{T NO.7 11al,d RESPTO IDE/vr lvo.8 SlPaee K

.rl Archana Solipuram and Arpita Naaram and t}re Developer M/s. N.R.R.construclions obtained, building permit order vide no. Oo997 9 / Bp / / HMDA / 2 1 80 / SKp / 20 2 3, dt:o4.Og.2023 & O 3.06.2O2s, permission granted for Proposed residential building with number of Blocks - 3, No. of Floors - 3 Cellar + 1 Sti1t + 30 Upper Floors w.ith built up area 146380.15 Sq.Mt", and later executed registered Ratihcation cum Addendum (To DAGpA doct no. 575/2022 | vide Doct no.18387 /2025, dt: 24.10.2025, and the said project is named as "AVAI{I", and later the appellant and developer entered into a registered supplementary agreement vide document no. lg4OI /2025, dt:24.1O.2O25, as the matter stood thus a1I the parties settled the matter amicably out of the Hon'ble Court and in tJ at process, the respondents (i.e, N.Vasantha, N.Sreeja & N.Sainath Reddy, N.Yadamma, L.Neelavathi & M.Manemma) being the only legal_heirs of respondent l:o.2 (Late N.Venkat Red.d.g u.tlut died on dt:O7.O4.2O23, and his only son late Raghunath reddg died. on dt:3O.O 1.2016)end, his elder brother who frled the partition suit that is Late N.Bhoomi Reddy being issueless (died on dt:21.O4.2O10), as such respondent no.3 to respondent no.8 entered into a compromise term and accordingly executed registered Rafification deed wlde document no. 654312026, dtz2t.O4.2O26, by ratifying the below mentioned documents in favou r of the Appellant and Developer M/s. N.R.R. Constructions, that is:- al Regd DAGPA Doct no. S7S / 2022, dt: 02.12.2022

b) Regd Addendum Doct no. B3a7 / 2025, dt:24.tO.2O25

c) Regd Supplementary Doct no. LB4OI /2025, dt:24.tO.2O25 RESFO llo.5 Ir\.valanttha- RESPOJVDE]\TT J\TO.3 .l\Io.6 E\./t/c4,"- e]$t RESPO DE]VT.NO.4 .R gr# g,*., \ -/J i mdl..6 ) ".!r\ ""---^ RESPOIVDEjV:r .l\Io.a N 9lPaqe

\> S SETTLED A]UONG AND RF^SPONDENT NO.3 TO NDENT NO.8 WITH RE'sPE'CT ITTM NO. 1 to 3 OF SCHEDULT .A PROPERTY: - IteIB No.1:- Land in Sv.no.72 admeasunn Ac.3.18 Gts of Kismatllpur (v) Item No.2:- Land in S .no.69 admeasu Ac.2.O7 Gts of Kismathpur (v)

a) As far as, item no.l and item no.2 lands are concerned, land in Sy.no.72, admeasuring Ac.3.18 Gts, and land in Sy.no.69/P admeasuring Ac.1.OO Gts out of Ac.2.07 Gts, art: subject matter in O.S.No. 765 of 2006, on the file of VIII Addl Senior Civil Judge, R.R.Districr, suit fiIed for declaration of title, frled by Appellant herein and the suit is dismissed on which the said appellant herein preferred A.S.No. 363 of 20 14, which is dismissed as withdrawn on 23.07.2026 by this Hon'ble Court, and the said lands were acquired by "Andhra Pradesh Engineering & Research Laboratories", & "Water and Land Management Training & Research Institute, through land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Nizam Government vide ftle lro. 27 l17 11356, dt: l.t Sherewar 1357, along with other lands in Kismathpur village, by suppressing the said fact respondent no. 1 / plaintiff (Late N.Bhoomi Reddy) Iiled Suit for partition including the said lands and obtairred Preliminary decree from the trail court, which has no sancLity in the eye of iaw, and the parties are not claiming any right over the said land through this Appeal Suit. N Vrq *,"'taoa.- RESP'OIVDEMT lVO.3 RESPO]VDEMT ]VO.4 $'4,i-P)h ,O o"y'd RES.FO.I\IDEMr lVO.7 .5 RESPONDIMT JVO.A .I\lo.6 $ 10 lPaee NO ) -.72 Tn t1., o o'

l'v-\

b) Balance land in item no.2 is concerned, sY.to.69lPadme Ac.1.O7 Gts (out of Ac.2.O7 Gts) is equally diwided among two brother that is N.Hanumanth Reddy (appellant) - Ac.0.24 Gts, having Dharani PB No. T{)5070230036, Kata no.260, DT:14.O4.2O18 and Late N.Venkat Reddy (Respondent no.2) - Ac.0.23 Gts, having Dharani PB No. TO5O7O23OO27, Kata no.192, dt: 14.04.2018 and accordingly the Appellant and Respond.ent no.S to Respondent no.8 haae no di.sprute ln the sald. d&ttslon oJ land.. tI SCHEDT'LE OF LI\ND BELONGS T() RESPIONDENT NO.s (N.SAI NATHI:- All tl, at the land admeasuring Ac.0.23 Gts (out of Ac. 1.O7 Gts) in Sy.no.69lA, situated at Kismathpur (V), Gandipet (M), R.R.District, bounded by: EAST: Land belongs to Giridhari Apartment WEST: Land belongs to ApERL NORTH: Land belongs to N.HanumantJ: Reddy SOUTH: Land belongs to Esa River Note:- During the life time of N.Venkat Reddy (Respondent no.2) executed registered Gift settlement deed in favour of N.Sainath (Respondent no.S), vide document no. 4t12023, dt.27.OI.2O23, to an extent of Ac.O.23 Gts and later N.Sai nath (Respondent no.5) executed registered Sale deed in favour of Mrs Sardarjagveer Karu and 2 ot-Jrers, vide document no.78/2024, dt:11.03.2O24, to an extent of Ac. O.23 Gts, for which neittrer the appellant nor t}re respondent no.3 to 4 and respondent no.6 to no.8 have no-objection. l\ 'r'aaonrllao tJ'1k"A*P$t1' RESP'O]VDE]\I:r AIO.4- lv-? tvo.3 RESFO

"Rg^dfl, t-a? $fJ €d NO.7 d\ .RESFO.I\tDtfl:r lvo.a (

11. lPage

rt scHEDULE OF LAND BELONGS TO lN.HANI'MANTh DY):- AllthatttrelancladmeasuringAc.o.24Gts(outofAc.1.o7Gts)in Sy.no.69/AA, situated at Kismathpur (V), Gandipet (M)' R'R District' bounded b1': EAST: Land belongs to Giridhari Apartment WESiT: Land belongs to APERL NORTH: Land of Balaiah SOUTH: Land beiongs to N'sainath Reddy As such the parties have no dispute witJ:r respect to iand in Sy.no.69/A, admeasuring Ac 1 O7 Gts (out of Ac 2'O7 Gts) which is mentioned as item no.2 scheduie property' Item llo.giland in Sv.no. 14 / P, admeasurinq Ac'5'21 Gts of Kismathpur l"]; The Said land in Sy.no.14/P, admeasuring Ac'5 21 Gts' situated at Kismathpur (V), is divided arnong two brother that is N Hanumanth Reddy (Appellant) - Ac.2 31 Gts, having Dharani PB No' T05070230036, Kata no 260 , DT:14'O4'2O18 zrnd Late N Venkat Reddy (Respondent no.2) - Ac 2 30 Gts, having Dharani PB No' TO5O7O23OO27,Katano.192,dt:14'04'2O18'andaccordinglythe Appellant and Respondent no.3 to Respondent n':'8 have no dispute in the said division of lands and Appellant even sold his share of land in favour of M/s. Rudra Infrastructure, vide registered Sale deed document no.375l l2Ol9, dt:15.03 2019 and Flespondent no 2 to Respondent no.S executed registered DAGPA doct no' 49412022 and 4g512022, dt: 75-09 2022 in favour of M/s' Ashoka Developers and Builders Ltd, and as such the parties have no dispute over the said item no.3 schedule ProPerty' . ,/yl*r-- AP-PELLANT N}ila3^{&5. RESP'ONDEIYr lvo.3 rvo.6 &-//'dr-?Aa'\ RES.PONDEMT JVO.4 sd05 d RESPOI,DEMT JVO.7 RESPO rYl NTJMO.5 o'L I s.( I 12 lPaee RES.FOilDEMT lvo.8

tL- t) CL/UUS SETTLED AUONG APPELIIINT /TND RESPONDENT NO.3 TO RESPIONDENT NO.8 WITH RESPDCT TO SCHEDI'LE.B PROPERTY: . Schedule - B Property is a residential house bearing D.No. l-54, consisting 3 rooms of Kaveli with arr extent about687.37 Sq.Yards (wrongly mentioned as 200 Sq.Yards in schedule), the said property is divided among both the parties that is, rl SCHEDIILE PROPERTY ALLOTED TO N.HANI'IIANTIIA REDD.T 6PPELLINTI:- A11 that the House bearing no.1-54, admeasuring 343.06 Sq,yards, (out of 687.37 Sq.yards) situated at Kismathpur Gram kartam (V), Gandipet (M), R.R.District, Telangana, bounded by: EAST: House of L.Sreedhar Reddy VIEST: House of A.Jukam Reddy NORTH: House of A.Sanjeev Reddy SOUTH: House of N.Sainath Reddy rl SCHEDIILE PROPERTY /ILLOTED TO RESPOI{DENT NO.3 TO RESPIONDENT NO.8 - STIARE OF I,'ITE N.VENKAT RIDDY:- All that t}re House bearing no.1-54, admeasuring 343.O6 Sq,yards, (out of 687.37 Sq.yards) situated at KismatJrpur Gram kantam (V), Gandipet (M), R.R.District, Telangana, bounded by: EAST: House of L.Sreedhar Reddy IIEST: House of A.Jukam Reddy NORTH: House of N.Hanumanth Reddy SOIIIH: House of A.Damodhar Reddy f'.i Vaarr,,9trar \)./edy$. APPELI,ANT RESPTOIVDEN? lVO.3 RESFO.I\IDEfl:T.hIO.4 fi{66 RESFO.IVDT.N:T J\IO.s '.L.6 RESFO.ilDEflT AIO.7 o,r g"B RESP'O.l\lDtl\ff lD.8 N 13 lPaee

It CLAIMS SETTLED AMONG APPEL,LANT AND RF,SPONDENT NO.S TO RESPONDENT NO.8 WITH RESPECT TO SCHEDULE .C PROPERTY:. The Respondent no.3 to no.8 received a flat admeasuring 2250 Sft and consideration of Rs.35,OO,0O0/- (rupees thirty-frve lakhs) is paid in'FULL ANDFINALSDTTLEMENT''aSmentionedbelowintheRatiflcationdeed doct no. 654312026, d1 21.O4.2026= r) Schedule of Flat allotted (2.25O SFTI From the Proiect land: - "A1l that the Semi-Finished Three Bed Room Flat bearing no' 5O2 (West Face) Fifth (Sth) floor of Block- 1 , admeasuring Saleable area of 2250 Sq.Ft, including common area and T\ro Car Parking/ s (bearing no, 1 13 & 116 - Basment -3) together with undivided share of land 32.73 Sq.yards, out ofland admeasuring 15,614'18 Sq.Yards (from total land 17,182 Sq.Yards, as 1567 82 Sq Yards is gifted for Road Widening to the Authorities) irL "AVANI", Situated in Sy.no. 29 ll lAA, Bandlagudajagir Village (Under GHMC), Gandipet Mandal, R.R.District, Telangana State, bounded by: EAST: Open to Sky, WEST: Corridor, NORTH: Open to Sky, SOUTH: Open to Sky. r) Amounts received bv Resoondeat no,3 to ResDonderrt no.8:- s.No DEFENDANT NAME AMOUNT lnBcprvpo

L.LEELAVATHI N.YADAMMA 5,00,o00/- 5,00,000/- 000355

M.MANEMMA 5,OO,000/-

N.VASANTHA 10,00,000/- ooo293 oo0344 ooo356 000343 t3.o2.2026

N.SAlNATH REDDY 5,00,000/- I 6 I lv.sntJA REDDY I 5,O0,000/- o00358

20. o4.2026 1tr Va5r4*kcn- Nt/&lf"P"J.&t RESP'O JVO.3 RESPONDIMTJVO.4 ,$ar{d R.ESFOIVDTMT IVO.7 APPE MT lvo.5

m&'V! A( CHF,QI'E NO DATE

20. o4.2026 0003s7

20. o4.2026

20. o4.2026 27.1r.2025

73. O2.2026 RESFOI\IDEMT ]VO.A 14 lPaEe t

TERrl[S OF REACHED AMONG THI PARTIES:

l. The Parties herein, together jointly confirm and ratify the registered DAGPA Doct no. S7S I 2022, dt:. 012.12.2022, Ra66catioa Cum Addenduo Doct ao. J8SAT I 2025, dt:.24.10.2025, Supplementary Deed Doct no.1g4o1 I 2025, dt.24.LO.2O2S, executed between the Appellant and M/ s. N.R.R.Constmctions as valid and binding on respondent no.3 to respondent no.8 with respect to the land in Sy.no.29l 1/AA, admeasuring Ac.3.22 cts, situated at Bandlagudqiagt Village, Gandipet Mandal, R.R.District. (Schedule - C property).

2. The Parlies do hereby declare and state that, this Joint compromise memo is frled with respect to the Schedule - A (3 items), Schedule _ B and Schedule - C of the properties mentioned in the said Suit. 3' A11 the Parties do hereby declare and state that, t1le terms of compromise and the share allocated to each party in the project land "AVANI", to be commenced in the Schedule property (Sy.no.29/ 1/AA, admeasuring Ac-3.22 Gts, Bandalgudajagir Village, candipet Mandal, R.R.District) are to their satisfaction and the parties agree not to claim any furtJrer share from the Appellart or from M/s. N. R. R.Constructions either after entering into tJlis compromise memo or in future and tJlis joint compromise memo will be treated as "FULL AND FIN/IL SE?TLEMENP, with respect to all ttre schedule of properties.

4. All the Parties together jointly agree to register the said "CoD.sent Decree', being obtained from the Honble Court in the above case after entering into this "Joint Compromise memo", only if necessary. $'vr5qr*lpy RESFOTVDE VT ro.3 5 6f']:,, tE":Sffiipe,* IY().6 \J-r,t{,&"2-l*vf RESPOtVDbrfr Jvo.4 ,0o X 6. RESFOIVDEfl:r.ivo.7 ^A "{rB.i, RESPO.I\IDEJYI lvo.a 15 lPaee M

Lo \r, the above terms of do herebY declare and state that' undertake that theY

5. Ali the Partres ed to their satrsfaction and they settlement are agre utes fuIIY and hnallY witJt respect to the Schedule have settled their disP

- B and Schedule - C ProPertres and neither theY -A (3 items), Schedule on any subsequent dates, shall not ralse nor their legai rePresentatlves' claims, liabilities or costs against eactr or demand or anY other disPutes' in relation to the said Suit Schedule other or agalnst the DeveloPer proPertres

7. The Said Joint Compromise rnemo is read over lly all the partres individually tt'O t"t"""O to their satisfaction without any force' coercron or undue influence "tta =t-tU1"t;t to such acceptance only the parties signed this 'lol'-'t cornp'irnl"" rn"rno and is frled before the Hon'lole Court for obuining Consent d""t"" orno'g the parties and the same shall be processed further for tJ*'*"t" U/s' Sectlon 17 of the registration act' in presence of all the 'u]t'""' preferably within a peri':d of 3 months from

6. A11 t]le Parties herewith agree for imPlementation of the Co Court in terms of the above Parties' dris date onlY if necessary' to execute necessary affictavits' documents ."*, U""t"" to be passed by t]lis Hon'ble ' Irrr"uul" setdement arrived between the N\.r14\^P+41 RESPONDIiI T IvO'4 t.} NO.3 NO.6 #*E,s*l RESPONDEI{T NO' . --- )-. ( m'1, c?y:-r NO.7 RESPO,IVDEMT NO.A 16 lPage

19- A IT is dlgrefore prayed that tJ'.is Honble Court may be pleased to record this joint compromise -d -ay pa"" consent decree in the above A.S.NO. 128 OF 2OO9, in terms of Compromise and to pass any other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the circumstance of the case. trl v4c'uJ-!,cL $&dh %Lr RESFOI|DEJYT lvo.3 RESFOJVDETYT ilO.4 J\IO.5 ivo.6 ,$ aS cA mo,$ RESPOI\|DE.\|? Ivo.7 RESPOIIIDEIIIT ]VO.8 COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT Ore- COUNSEL FOR RTSPONDENT NO.s TO IT().6 htla{ - couNsELFoR L\btW) ( j Epn4k+tfl ENT NO.7 & E i <s-rt .'.!- 17 lPaee P{j -4,J