CRP/1743/2026 of S. Dushyanth Reddy Vs Mohammed Hadi Ali on 31 August 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

IVONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

crvlL REVISION PETITION NO: 1743 OF 2026

Petition under Artrcle 227 of lhe constitution of lndra aggrieved by the Docket order dated 06t04t2026 in LA No. 529 0f 2025 in o s No. 126 0f 2018 0n the file of the court of the lst Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum special sessions Judge for the Fast Tracking of the cases relating to atrocitles against women, Vikarabad District Between:

S. Dushyanth Reddy, S/o. V Narsimha Reddy, Aged about 73 years, Occ'

Business, R/o. Plot Nos. 13 and 14, Annapurna Society, lVlahindra Hills, East IVlaredpally, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER/PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF

AND

1. IVlohammed Hadi Ali, S/o. Hadi Ali, Aged aboul 42 years, Occ Business, R/o'

Post Box No. KSAO, Prince Sattam Street, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Rep by his GPA Holder Habib Abdul Razzaq Baghdadi @ Hadi Ali, S/o Late Habib Mohammed Baghdadi (tVlohammed Ali), Aged about 62 years, Occ'

Business, Rlo 3-5-78412, King Koti, Hyderabad

2. tVl/s. Kancharla constructions Pvt. Ltd, rep. by its It/lanaging Director K. Prithvi Reddy S/o. K. Santosh Reddy. Aged about 34 years, Occ' Business, R/o H'

No. 6-1-72, Flat No. B-30'l , Shree IVahalakshmi [/ieadows, Lakdikapul, Hyderabad

...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/DEFENDANTS

l.A. NO: 2 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed rn support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay all further proceedings in O S No 126 cf 2018 by the lst Additional District & Sessions Judge- cum-Special Sessions JLrdge for the fast tracking of the cases relating to atrocities against women Vrkaracad drstrict at Vrkarabad Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Vadeendra Joshi Counsel for the Respondents: Sri Kondaparthy Kiran Kumar The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

DATE: 31.O8.2O26

CIVI

REVISION PETITION

o.L743 OF 2(J26

(cNR No. HBHCO10399322026)

Between:

S. Dushyanth Reddy

...Petitioner/ Petitioner/ Plaintiff

AND

Mohammed Hadi Ali and another'

,..n""pona.nts/ Respondents/ Defendants

OROER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed aggrieved by the impugned Docket Order dated 06.04.2026 in I'A'No'529 of 2025 in o.s.No.126 of 2018 passed by the learned I Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-special sessions Judge for Fast Tracking the cases relating to Atrocities against women, vikarabad District, at vikarabad.

2.

Heard Mr. Vadeendra Joshi, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Kondaparthy Kiran Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents.

Perused the material on record.

-

3.

The petitioner, who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.126 of 2018, filed the said suit seeking declaration in respect of land admeasuring 9,680 square yards equivalent to Ac.2.00 guntas irr Sy.No.Bo/part of Manneguda Village, Pudur Mandal, Vikarabad District. The petitioner had filed his ch ief-exa m ination affidavit as PW1 and marked documents as Exs.A1 to 46 and the matter was posted for his cross-exa m ination.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is aged about 73 years, filed i.A.No.529 of 2025 under Order XVIII Rule 4

read with Section 151 of the Code ol Civil procedure, 1908, before the trial Court seeking appointment of an Advocate commissioner to record his cross-exa mination at his residence"at Hyderabad on the ground of old age and ill-health. The trial court dismissed the said application observing that the petitioner had not produced any medical record to substantiate his alleged ill-health to show that he was unable to attend the court for cross-exa m ination.

5,

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner is now ready and willing to appear before the trial court in person for his cross-exa m ination. He further submits that the matter is posted to 17.09.2026 and that the petitioner undertakes to remain present on the said date.

6. In view of the above submission, the petitioner iS directed to appear before the triar court on 11.0g.2026 For his cross-exa mination.

@!rt:eiBg6s@e*t

To,

On his appearance, the respondents shall proceed with and conclude the cross-examination of the petitioner on the said date, without fail.

7.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, in this Civil Revision Petition, shall stand closed.

,TRUE COPYI/

SD/. M.OSMAN ALI BAIG

SISTANT REGISTRAR

CTION OFFICER

'1 . The lst Additional District and Sessions Judge-c sds relating to atrocl -special Sessto ties against for the Fast Tracking of the ca Vikarabad District dra Joshi, Advocate IOPUCI

toPUCl

2. One CC to Sri Vadeen

arthY Kiran Kumar' Advocate

3. One CC to Sri KondaP

4. Two CD CoPies

VFVGNK

Y{-

ns Judge

Women,

HIGH COURT

DATED: 3110812026