CRP/1783/2026 of Miss Aluri Shoba Rani Vs M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., on 7 August 2026

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY

ctVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1783 OF 2026

Petition under Anide 227 of the Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 27-04-2026 in EP No. 2312025 in ARC No. 10712020 on the file of the lX Addl Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad Between:

lVliss Aluri Shoba Rani, d/o Laxmiah, Hindu aged about 50 years, r/o 11-1-937

and 938, Sitarambagh, t\,4angalghat, Hyderabad

...PETITIONER

AND

1. M/s Shriram Finance Ltd., H.No.3-6-478, 4th floor, Anand Estates, Liberty Road, Himayathnagar, Hyderabad and one such branch situated at Chikkadpally, Hyderabad.

2. Chippalapally Madhu, s/o lvlalsoor, 30 years,

3. Chippalapally lt/alsoor, s/o Bayanna, 52 years. (Resp 2,3 r/o H No. 3-12-24, Plot No, 24, Laxmi Nagar Colony, LB Nagar, SK Nagar, Hyderabad)

4. T. Venugopalaswamy, s/o Singara Swamy, 63 years, retired Employee, r/o Flat no. 405, Plot No. 1,2,3, Reddy Colony, Biralamguda, Saroornagar, Hyderabad

...RESPONDENTS

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the operation of attachment of Warrant of the Salary of the petitioner issued by the IX

Addl. Chief Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad in E P. No. 23 ol 2025 in ARC No 1O7 of 2020 Dated 27 -04-2026 in the interest of Justice.

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. P Suresh Counsel for the Respondents: Sri. Subrahmanya Sastry Marla The Court made the following: ORDER

IN TIII' TIIGH COI.IITT FOR THE STATE O} 'TT-I- \NG,\\-A AT

HYDER{BAD

I'II[- HGNOT'ITABI,E SRI JT.STICE P.SA]\! KOSHY

CRP.No.1783 of 2026

Date:07.08.2026

Bctrvccn:

i\'1s. {lLrri S nohr ,R.rrri

Pctitioner'

And

l\4/s.Slrrir':rLr I inarrci [-td.. C hikkadapalll. H]derat,tl j .it'(r (,r.her'i Respondents ORDI]R

lleal'tl \4is.P.Sul'csh. learned counsel Ii-t th; petrtioner and Mr.M.Subrahrranl r Sastr). lcarned counsel Ir,r rcspondetlt No. larld perusell tl-.:-- r-cccrd

2.

I he instant is ihc (]ivil Revision Petitio r. 'r hich lias been filed undcr Section I l-5 of' Corle of' Cir'il []roceJure, 1908.

(lbr shorr'-the il.P.C.") aggiieved by the order',.1:ir",., 27.0J,2026 passcd bl thc lX .\citliti,rnal ()hiel- .ludgc. City Ci\;l f-'rurt. I',r'derabad.

tn

lr.P.No.il3 o1'1025 rn AI{C.No. 107 o12020

3.

fhe lirnitcd reliel'tl1at the petitioner has .;cr.rghi lbr in thc instarlt cir il rcr ision petition is fbr rnodifying the order oi allach,rlent issued on 27.012(l),6 to lhc c\tent thar inspite of attachn.rcrir or'salary of Rs.l000/- and l,'.1 r or'r'einain,n! srrarl being ordered to b,c aitached. he should pay t-r

Rs.l000/- and.2l3'd ,rf ienraining salary. The said nrodiflcation sought for is based upon the provisions of Section 60 (i) of C.P.C. 'l his Court vide its interim ordcr clated 28.07.2026 had ordered the concerned Court to ensure that deductiol of salary of order be made only in terms of provision of Scction 5il (i) of C.P.C.

4.

Today, Ivlr.M,subrahmanya Sastry, learned counsel. entercd appearance on behalt ol- respondent-Decree-holder and submits that he does not hale an1' strong objection to the extent of order of altachment being modified in tenns o1'provision of Section 60 (i) of C.P.C.

5.

In vie*' of the satre, this Court is of the considered opinion that let the attachnent ordei issued by' thd IX Additional Chiel Jtrdge, City Civil Court. HydetLbtril. in EP.No.23 of 2025 in ARC.No, 107 of 2020

be passed ensuring ihat order of attachment is in accot'dancc rvith the provision of Section 60(i) of C.P.C. i.e. attachment of salary to the extent of salary ol' Rs.1.000/- and 213'd of the remaining part of salary instead of Rs.1000,. and l/3'd of remaining salary as has bcen ordered by the Executing Cour1,

6.

With the aliresaid observations and modifuing the irnpugned order of attachmcnl ol salary to the extent of Rs.l000/- and 2/3'd of remaining parl of salary. the Civil Revision Petition is partlv allowed.

There shall be no order as to costs.

Consequcntlv. miscellaneous petitions pe n,Jing. if any, shall stand closed TPK/KA

SD/- C.DEEPIKA

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

1. The lX Addl Chief Judge. City Civil Court, Hyderabad

2. One CC to SRl. P SURESH Advocate IOPUC]

3. One CC to SRI SUBRAHN/ANYA SASTRY IVIARLA Ad\/ocate [OPUC]

4 Two CD Copres

SECTION OFFICER

To,

,%

HIGH COURT

DATED: 0710812026