Telangana High Court
WP/25337/2026 of Nakka Jyothi Vs State of Telangana on 4 August 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 25337 OF 2026 Between: Nakka Jyothi, Wo. Rajesh Kumar, Aged about 41
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 25337 OF 2026
Between:
Nakka Jyothi, Wo. Rajesh Kumar, Aged about 41 years, Occ: Housewife, R/o H.No.3-'104/5/47715RV, Setharapuram Colony, Near Vedika Function Hall Patancheru, Sangareddy District.
...PETITIONER
AND
'1 . State of Telangana, Panchayat Raj Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad. Rep. by its Principal Secretary.
2. The District Collector, Sangareddy District.
3. The Tahsildar, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District.
4. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Hathnoora Mandal. Sangareddy District.
5. The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Anand Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad -
500004.
6. The Panchayat Secretary, Palpanoor Grampanchayat, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy Diskict.
7. B. Maithri, Wo. B. Narsimhulu Goud, Aged about 36 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o.
H.No.1-59/3/10, Old Lingampally, Serilingampally, Rangareddy District.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 6 in trying to interfere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner's construction activity in an extent of 200 sq. yds in Sy.No.164Al112 and an extent of 200 sq. yds in Sy.No.164fu2 for construction of G+'1 floor each, situated at Palpanoor Village, Hathnoor Mandal, Sangareddy District as per the permission granted by the 6th respondenl vide permit Nos.26/BP/2024 and28lBPl2O24 da\ed22.09.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and also in violation of principles of naturaljustice and consequently direct the Respondents No.2 to 6 not to interfere with the possession and construction of the plots of the petitioner
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under Section '151 CPC praying that In the circumstances stated in the affldavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No.2 to 6 not to interfere with the construction activity of lhe petitioner as per the permission granted by the 6th respondent vide permit Nos.26lBp/2024 and 2818P12024 daled 22.09.2024 in an extent of 200 sq. yds in Sy.No.164tu1/2 and an extent of 200 sq. yds in Sy.No.164Al2 for construction of G+'l floor each, situated at palpanoor Village, Hathnoor Mandal. Sangareddy District, pending disposal of the WP.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI S.V. RAMANA
Counsel for the Respondent No,l: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ
Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: GP FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondent No.4 to 6: SRI PRADEEP REDDY KATTA, SC FOR GRAM PANCHAYATH
Counsel for the Respondent No.7: - - - - The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAIESHWAR RAO
DATE: O4.O8.2O25
WRIT PETITION No.25337 OF 2026
Between:
Nakka Jyothi
AND
State ofTelangana,
Panchayat Raj DePartment,
Secretariat, HYderabad,
Rep. by its Principal Secretary and others.
.,. Petitioner
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed seeking the following relief: ....to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.z to 6 in trying to inteffere with the peaceful possession of the petitioner's construction activity in an extent ot 200 sq. yds in Sy'No'164A/1/2 and an extent of 200 sq' yds in 5y'No'164A/2 for construction of G+1 floor each, situated at Palpanoor Viltage, Hathnoor Mandal, Sangareddy District as per the permission granted by the 6th respondent vide permit Nos.26/BP/2024 and 2B/BP/2024 dated 22.09.2024 as illegal, arbitrary and also in violation of principtes of natural justice and consequently direct the
Respondents No.2 to 6 not to possession and construction of petitioner and Pass'.. interfere with the plots of the the
2. HeardSriS.V.Ramana,learnedcounselappearingforthe petitioner, and Sri Pradeep Reddy Katta, learned Standing Counsel for Gram Panchayat appearing for respondent No'4'
3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner is the absolute owner and possessor of land admeasuring Ac'O'10 guntas in Sy.No.164/A and Ac.0.10 guntas in Sy'No'164/A/2, situated at Palpanoor Village, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District' After obtalning conversion of the subject land and building permissions vide Proceedings Nos.26lBPl2O24 and 2B/BP/2O24' bothdated22'og.2024,thepetitionercommencedconstructionin accordance with the sanctioned plan. While so, the 7th respondent submitted a complaint dated 13.07.2026 before the 6th respondent seeking stoppage of the construction Though the petitioner submitted a detailed explanation dated 15.07 2026, no orders have beenpassedthereon.Aggrievedbytheallegedinterferenceofthe respondent aUthorities with the petitioner,S construction activity, the present Writ Petition has been filed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite the petitioner possessing valid building permissions, the respondent authorities are interfering with the construction activity on a day-to- day basis solely on the basis of the complaint dated l3'O7'2026 submitted by the 7th respondent' He further submits that the complaint is without any basis and' despite the explanation submitted by the petitioner, no orders have been passed thereon' Learned counsel, therefore, prays this Court to direct the respondent authorities not construction activitY' to interfere with the Petitioner's
5. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondent authorities are directed not to interfere with the petitioner,S construction activity, without following due process of law. However, if any deviation other than sanctioned permission is found, the respondent authorities are at liberty to take appropriate action in accordance with law'
6. With the above direction' the Writ Petition is disposed of' There shall be no order as to costs' Asasequel,miscellaneousapplicationspending,ifany,inthis Writ Petition, shall stand closed' SD/- U. SUDHA=T I To, ASSISTANT REGIST //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER
1. The Principal Secretary, State of Telangana, Panchayat Raj Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
2. The District Collector, Sangareddy District.
3. The Tahsildar, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District.
4. The Mandal Parishad Development Officer, Hathnoora Mandal. Sangareddy District.
5. The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj, Anand Nagar, Khairatabad, Hyderabad. - 500004.
6. The Panchayat Secretary, Palpanoor Grampanchayat, Hathnoora Mandal, Sangareddy District.
7. One CC to SRt S.V. RAMANA, Advocate tOpUCl
8. ONC CC tO SRI PRADEEP REDDY KATTA, S-C TON GRAM PANCHAYATH toPUcl 9 Two ccs to GP FoR pANcHAyAT RAJ, High court for the state of rerangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] 10 Two CCs to Gp FoR REVENUE, High court for the state of rerangana. [oUT] 1 1 . Two CD Copies 8N
HIGH COURT DATED: 0410812026
ORDER
WP.No.25337 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS
0/rU62026 z C CC TODAY oR 1 HE SI4 t * * or.iiraj::C'rd'L . \ \p-r 0o