Telangana High Court
CRLRC/715/2026 of Mr. Mohamood Pasha Vs The State of Telangana on 21 July 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 715OF 2026 Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS against the order dated
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TWENry FIRST DAY OF JULY
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 715OF 2026
Criminal Revision Case filed under Section 438 and 442 of BNSS against the order dated 02.06.2026 passed in Crl.MP.No.218 of 2026 in Crl.Appeal No.16 of 2026 on the file of the Court of the I Additional Sessions Judge, at Mahabubnqgar preferred against the judgment daled 17.04.2026 in STC.NI.No. 04 of 2023 on the file of the Court of the Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class-Mobile Court at Mahabubnagar.
Between:
Mr. Mohamood Pasha, S/o. Mr. Abdul Rahman, age 45 Years, Occ.
Government Employee, R/o. H.No.5-7-01001 , Rahisya Maszid Ahmed Nagar, Mahabubnagar.
...REVISION PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ACCUSED
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana.
2. Mr. Devender Rao, S/o. Mr. Kantha Rao, Aged about 61 Years, Occ.
Agriculture, Rt/o. H.No.6-74, Janampet Village, Moosapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
...RESPONDE NTS/COM PLAINANT
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2026
Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fited in suppot^o^Ltl"_n9!i!r9n, th; High Court may Oe pf*..Jt"
suspend the order dt.02.06.2026 in crr.Mp.No.2rc oi zoza in crrhpp"i rvo.i6 0t 2026 on the fire of r-Additionar Sessions Judge, at Mahahubnagar, pdnoing iirpo.rr of the Crl.RC Petition.
Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Narsi Reddy pesara Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: public prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER
Mr.Mohamood Pasha
S/o. Mr.Abdul Rahman
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.715 OF 2026
DATE: 21.07.2026
Between:
. . Petitioner/
Accused
And
The State of Telalgana,
Rep.b1't its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
Hyderabad.
... Respondent
Complainant
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438 and, 442 of the Bharatil'a Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS) by the petitioner/accused aggrieved by the order, dated. 02.062026, in Crl'M'P'No'218 of 2026 in Crl.A.No.|6of2o2tl(STCNINo.4of2023)passedbythe learnedlAdditionalsessionsJudge,Mahabubnagar,whereby the petitioner filed an application under Section 389 (1) of the Cr.P.C.. seekrng to suspend the operation of sentence of imprisonment imposed against the petitioner' was aliowed'
2. Heard Sri Narsi Reddv Pesara, learned counsel for the revisions pctitioner anci perused the record.
-
SK5,J ctirc 115 2026
3. The case of the petitioner is that aggrieved by the conviction and sentence imposed against the petitioner vide judgment, dated 17.04.2026 in STC.NI.No.4 of 2023 on the file of learned Special Judicia,l Magistrate of First Class-Mobile Court at Mahabubnagar, the petitioner preferred an appea_l. Pending appeal, the petitioner filed the aforesaid miscellaneous application seeking suspension of sentence imposed against him till disposal of the aforesaid appeal. The learned Sessions Judge rvhile suspending sentence imposed against the petitioner til1 disposal of the appeal directed him to deposit a sum of Rs.2,4O,OO0/- i.e., 2oyo of the compensation amount.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that without assigning any reasons, the learned Sessions Judge directed the petitioner to deposit 2)yo of the compensation amount, which is illegal and at present the petitioner is not in a position to pay the said amount and hence, he prays to reduce the same.
5. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the ratio laid down sKs,l ctic 71,5 )026 by the learned Hon'ble Supreme Court in Jamboo Bhandari v. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. & ORS t the petitioner is directed to deposit l Oyn of the compensation amount, instead of 2Ool', as directed by the learned I Additional Sessions Judge, Mahabubnagar, uide order, dated 02.06.2026, in Cr1.M.P.No.218 of 2026 in Crl.A.No. 16 of '2026 u'ithin a period of one (1) month from the date of recerpt of a c'opy of this order. The other portion of the impugned order shall remain unaltered.
6. With the abo','e modification, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. SD/. MOHD.ISMAIL DEPUTY REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, b Two CD CoPies
1.
2. ?
The lAdditional Sessions Judge, at Mahabubnagar The Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class-Mobile Court at Mahabubnagar' Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor' High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] One CC to Sri Narsi Reddy Pesara' Advocate [OPUC] YH/KA ' lzoz:1 ro scc a+o
HIGH COURT DATED: 2110712026
ORDER
CRLRC.No.715 of 2026 DISPOSING OF CRL.R"C @, C 2 5 JUr 2026 r..) 1 $E 3 rAr 5I:S c <\ .\ ( z a')
I
L L 2', >\