Telangana High Court

CRLP/10622/2026 of Mr.Mohemud Zamrud Khan@Md Jamrud Khan Vs The State of Telangana on 16 July 2026

Cites 1, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CRIMINAL PETITION No:10565 &10622of 2026 Criminal Petition No.1 0565 ot 2026 Between: 1. Mr.t\/ohmed Mateen Khan Pasha @ Mateen Khan

132171

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY, THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

CRIMINAL PETITION No:10565 &10622of 2026

Criminal Petition No.1 0565 ot 2026

Between:

1. Mr.t\/ohmed Mateen Khan Pasha @ Mateen Khan Pasha, S/o. Md Kaja Pasha, Aged about 29 years, Occ: Business Rl/o' H.No.28-149/2, Raithu Colony, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Shadnagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana (A3)

2. Mr.Mohemmed Mansoor Pasha @ Riyan Pasha, S/o. Khaja Pasha, Aged about 21 years, Occ: Scarp business Rl/o. H.No.28114912' Raithu Colony, Farooq Nagar tr/andal, Shadnagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana (A4)

3. Mr.Mahamed @ Mohammed, Sio. Md. Gouse, Aged about 30 years, Occ Private Employee H.No.291181 , Raithu Colony, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Shadnagar, Rangareddy District, Telangana (A5)

...Petitioners/Accused A3 to A5

AND

The State of Telangana, through SHO, Shadnagar Police Station, Future City Commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District Rep. by its State Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

Mr.Kummari Vinay Kumar, S/o. Kummari Krishnaiah, Aged about 30 years, Occ Private Employee, Fyo. CSK Green Villas, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Shadnagar Town, Rangareddy District-509216. Telangana Mobile No.

8522887511

...Respondents/Defacto-Complainant

Petition under section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/ Accused A3 to A5 on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arresi in connection with Crime No.535 of 2026, dated 27.06.2026, registered by the station House Officer, shadnagar Police station, Future city commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, for the offences punishable under Sections 298, 299' 196, 329(3), 324(4), 351(2), 352 r/w Section 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Mr. surender Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Syed yasar Mamoon, Additional public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2.

Criminal Petition No.1 0622 ol 2026

Between:

1. Mr.Mohemud Zamrud Khan@Md Jamrud Khan, S/o. Hameed Khan, Aged about. 45 years, Occ: Business Fl/o. H.No.2g-232, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Shadnagar Town, Rangareddy District, Telangana (Al )

2. Mr.Abdul Sikinder Khan @ Md. Sikinder, S/o. Abdul Hameed Khan, Aged about. 56 years, Occ: Business R/o. H.No.29-17, Besidt_, Govt High School, Farooq Nagar Mandal, Shadnagar Town, Rangareddy District, Telangana (A2)

AND

...petitioners/Accused A1 & A2

1. The State of Telangana, through SHO, Shadnagar police Station, Future City Commissio nerate, Ranga Reddy District Rep. by its State Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad.

2. Mr.Kummari Vinay Kumar, S/o. Kummari Krishnaiah, Aged about 30 years, Occ Private Employee, R/o. CSK Green Villas, Farooq Nagar Mindal, Shadnagar Town, Rangareddy District-S0g2i 6. Telangana Mobile No.

8522887511

... Respondents/Defacto-Com plai nant

Petition under Section 482 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal petition, the High court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 and 2 on anticipatory bail, in the event of their arrest in connection with crime No.535 of 2026, dated.i7.06 2026, registered by the Station House Officer, Shadnagar police Station, Futur-e City commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, for the offences punishable under sections 298, 299, 1 96, 329(3), 324(4), 351(2), 352 rtw Section 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

_ This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of lrr1r. Surender Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioners and Mr. Syed yasar Mamoon, Additional public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI

CRIMINAL PETITION No.10s65 & 106220F 2026

DATE : 16.07.2026

CRIMINAL PETITION No.10565 ot 2026

Between:

Mr.Mohmeed Mateen Khan Pasha @ l\tlateen Khan and Others

...Petitioners

AND

The State of Telangana and Another

...Respondents

CRIMINAL PETITION No.10622 of 2026

Between

t\Ir.Mohemed Zamrud Khan @ IVld.Zamrud Khan and Another

...Petitioners

AND

The State of Telangana and Another

...Respondents

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

1

Decisions referred to

In this index

1

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

:COMMON ORDER:

These criminal Petitions are filed under section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha sanhita (for short'BNSS',), seeking grant of anticipatory bail Heard t\ilr.surender Reddy, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr.Syed

Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent No.1-State

Since the issues involved in botlr the Criminal Petiticns are substantially similar and arise out of analogous facts and circumstances, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

4. The petitroners are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 5 in Crime No.535 of 2026 on the file of the Shadnagar Police Station, Future City commissionerate, Ranga Reddy District. facing accusattons under sections 298, 2gg, 196 329(3) 324(4), 351(2). read with 3(5) of Bharativa Nvaya Sanhita,2023 (1or short, "BNS")

5. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, altlrough the petitioners are fully willing to cooperate rryith the investigation, they errtertain a reasonable apprehension that coercive action may be taken against them. Such apprehension arises notwithstanding the fact that the offe nces alleged against them are punishable urith imprisonnrent for a term of less than seven years and that the lnvestigating Agency has not issued a notice: under Section 35(3) of the BNSS. lt is further submitteci that the petitionei's have no intention of evading the investigation and are ready and willing tc participate in and extend full cooperation to the lnvestigaling Officer. ln the afcresaici circumstances, learned counsel confines the relief sought to a dii-ecltc-t to the lnvestigating Agency to act in accordance u/ith la\^r by issuing a noilc-' under Section 35(3) of the BNSS thereby protecting the peiitioners fronr any unwarranted coercive action.

The learned Additional public prosecutor opposed the pefition. However, no specific reason has been put forward for not issuing a notice to the petitioners under Section 35(3) of the BNSS.

7. I have perused the material available on record B. Having regard to the fact that the offence alleged against the petitioners is punishable with imprisonment for a term of less than seven years and in view of the petitioners' categorical undertaking to participate in and fully cooperate with the investigation, without expressing any opinion cn the merits of the case, this court considers it appropriate tc extend to the petitioners the statutory safeguards envisaged under section 35(3) of the BNSS, leaving all issues open to be examined by the lnvestigating Agency during the course of the investigation.

9. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to appear before the station House officer, shadnagar Pclice station, Future city cornmissionerate, Ranga Reddy District, within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. upon such appearance, the lnvestigating officer shall issue a notice to the petitioners under Section 35(3) of the BNSS in crime No. 1 38 of 2026 and shall thereafter proceed strictly in accorciance with law, duly adhering to the principles and guidelines enunciaied by the Hon'ble supreme court in Arnesh Kumar y. Slale of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273. The petitioners shall, in turn, extend full cooperation to the Investigating Officer durrng the course of investigation

10. With this direction, these Criminal Petitions are disposed of. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/. B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTION OFFICER To, The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate at Shadnarlar. The Station House Officer, Shadnagar Police Station, Fr-ture City District. One CC to Mr. Surender Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to Public Prosecutor High Court for the Slate of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies KAM/KA iN

HIGH COURT DATED: 1610712026

COMMON ORDER

GRLP.Nos.10565 &',0622 ot 2026 DISPOSING OF THESE CRIMINAL PETITION + 2 I,ltlt 2020 o A yrE Sf41 cO o Y .)c r-t o( [..", \+-\ j'trs , .._==_ {t * 6,1 q ) S ]L {

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead