CRLRC/682/2026 of M/s Dadson Enterprises Vs M/s Clarion Agro Products Pvtd ltd on 13 July 2026

[ 33851

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEEANGANA

AT HYDERABAD

MONDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF JULY

TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 682 OF 2026

criminal Revision filed under section 438 & 442 of BNSS., against the order dated: 15.05.2026 passed in the crl.M.P.No. 765 of 2026in Crl.A.No. ',I80 of 2026 on the file of the court of the Additional Sessions Judge for the trial of communal offence cases cum vll Additional sessions Judge cum XXI Additional chief Judge, Hyderabad.

Between:

AND

M/sDadsonEnterprises,repbyitsDMKNaiduAgedabout62yearsOcc:

business office No KIG- A-72, Bh,agavati nivas op Vertex peal road, Dro AS Rao Nagar ECIL PO Hyderabad

..,PETITIONER/APPELLANT

M/s Clarion Agro Products Pfid ltd, Rep by its Manager Mr. shaik Muqthiar S/o

S. Abdul Rash-eed, aged about 42 yeas Occ: Manger factory at plot No 41 and 53SyNo-l65andl66,lndustrtialparkPhaselll,Pashamylaram,Patancheruvu mandal, Sanga reddy district.

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT

2. The state of Telangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor High court Hyderabad

...RESPONDENTS/ RESPONDENT

.A. NO: 1 OF 2026

Petition under section 528 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to suspend the order dated 15.05.2026 in the crl.M.P. No. 765/2026 in crlA No. 180/2026 0n the file of Additional sessions Judge for the trial of communal offence cases cum Vll Additional Sessions Judge cum XXI Additional Chief Judge, Hyd,erabad'

Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri. Gudi Madhusudhan Reddy Counsel for the Respondent no.2: Additional Public Prosecutor The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

ATHYDERABAD

.

THI HONOURABLE SMT' JUSTICE K' SUJANA

CA

13.o

And

OR D

20F

slON

SE

7.2

ER

No.

Betwe

c

en:

AL

D

on EnterPnses

DMK Naidu'

.. .Petitioner/

APPellant

... ResPondent

ComPlainant

M/s.Dads

reP.bY its

M/ s'Clarion Agro Products

hrt.Ltd. ReP'bY its Manager'

*..a"rU Vf"qtttiut S/o S'Abdul

Rasheed' F ctno then '

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 438

and' 442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita' 2023

(for short tsNSS) by the petitioner/Accused aggrieved by the order, dated 15'05'2026' in Crl'M'P'No'765 of 2026 in crl.A.P.No,18 o of 2026 in (C'C'NI No'6077 of 20221 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for the Trial of Communal Offence Cases-cum-Vll Additional Sessions Judge- cunr-XXI Additional Chief Judge' Hyderabad'

st 5,J

tltc 6a2 2025

2.

Respo:

fired c.c.NI.*o.u,no""t

No'1 herein is r

t77 or 2o22(ord cc .'l -- ":'u,na,,t, who against the petition." *^_-.

(v.q uu 'NI IVo' 15429 of 2019)

Negotiabre Instruc

herein under

for recovery o, *

t'o'" Act' 1BB1 (for sI

138 of the

, e arne d virr .,uarci arT;::j::: *j ;.: .:" ;":' 1l:

considering the evi,c,.^^

"' r . 'L urass' Nampally, after

documentary or, ."lu'."'""

o' record' both orai and

found the o",r,io.r".totd'

uid'e Judgment' d'ated 27'04'2026

guitty of the offence punishable under

Section 13g of the Act, i gB 1 ard accordingl_v he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of six months ald also sentenced to pay fine of Rs.6,5l,O0O/-, in default he shaii undergo simple imprisonmen t for aperiocl of three months. It is stated aggrieved by the said judgment, the petitioner filed appeal. pending appeal, he filed the aforesaid Miscellaneous petition to suspend the sentence and compensation imposed by the learned trial Court vide ,Judgment, dated 2t .O4.2026 in C.C.NI No.6O77 of 2022. The l-rial Sessions Judge vide order, dated 15.05.2026 white SUSpending Sentence imposed a condition that the petitioner shall deposit 2O('/o of the compensation amount by r""'av of FDR

sKs,l

cttc 682 2026

before the trial Court on or before 15.07.2026, failing which the suspension of sentence shail stand vacated automatically without further reference to the Court. Aggrieved by the said order, the present Criminal Revision Case is filed.

3. Heard Sri G.Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the learned trial Court without considering the evidence on record only basing on presumptions and assumptions, directed the petitioner to deposit 2Oo/o of the compensation amount; that the petitioner is suffering with alterior vaginal waJl cystectomy and operation was conducted and due to which he is unable to move from the house to pay the said amount; that due to financial problems, the petitioner is unable to pay the compensation amount; that the petitioner has .good grounds to succeed in appeal ald therefore, imposing condition to deposit 2OVo of the compensation amount awarded by the learned tria-l Court is contrar5r to law arld hence, he prays to reduce the same.

5.

Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner and having regard to the facts and

SK5,I

c( tc 687 2076

circumstan ces stated in the petition and taking into consideration the larv laid down by the Horllcle Supreme Court in Jamboo Bhandari v. M.P. State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. & ORS 1 the petitioner is directed to depostt 1O% of the compensation amount, instead of 2Oo/o, as directed b1' the learned VII Additional Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, uide order, dated 15'05 2026, in Crl.M.P.No.765 of 2026 in Crl.A'P.No'180 of 2026 within a period of tu'o (2) rveeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6.

With the above modification, the Criminal Revision Case is dtsposed of.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shal1 stand c1o sed /TTRUE COPY//

SD/. N SRIHARI

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SEGTION OFFICER

To

The Additional Sessions Judge for the trial of gomlynal offence cases cum Vll Additional sessions Juoge ;'; x-it nJoitionat chief Judge Hyderabad'

Two ccs to the pubtic pr;;;;ri;;. itgh court for the state of relangana' at Hvderabad [OUT]

lji,"" Ci" iii cudi Maonusudhan Reddv' Advocate IoPUC]

'1.

J

Two CD CoPies

'1zoz:1 ro scc aao

C,

HIGH COURT

DATED: 1310712026