Telangana High Court
WP/29769/2011 of K.PRABHAKAR REDDY, HYDERABAD. Vs COMMISSIONER, GHMC., HYDERABAD AND 2 OTHERS on 30 June 2026
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO K. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 68 years, Occ: Agriculture R/o H.No.2341-AlC, MLAs
l348s l
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW SIX
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
K. Prabhakar Reddy, S/o K. Ramakrishna Reddy, Aged 68 years, Occ:
Agriculture R/o H.No.2341-AlC, MLAs Colony, Hyderabad.
PETITIONER
EIII'
1. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation, GHMC Buildings, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad Tank Rep by its Commissioner.
2. The Deputy Commissioner, Circle No.X, GHMC, GHMC Buildings, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.
3. The Town Planning Officer, GHMC Buildings, Tank Bund Road, Hyderabad.
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstanccs stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ Order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the order No.2074ffPS/GHMC/2011, dt.18.10.201 1 issued by the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbikary, violative of principles of natural justice and also violative of Articles 14,21 and 300-A of Constitution of lndia and consequently to set aside the same.
N
10F
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the order No.2074ffPS/GHMC/201 1'
dt.18.10.2011 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above writ petition.
:l
l.A. NO: 2 0F 2011(WP
P. NO: 39863
20111
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be gleased the writ petition No. 2976512011 may be posted for 'for being mentioned' for pa'ssing necessary orders in the interest of justice.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI K. CHIDAMBARAM
counsel for the Respondents: sRl MTDDE ARUN KUMAR, sc FoR GHMC
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CTMT,EPETHI RAO
DATE: 3O.O6.2O26
Between:
K. Prabhakar Reddy
.Petitioner
AND
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
GHMC Buildings, Tank Bund Road,
Hyderabad, Rep., by its Commissioner and2 others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
when the matter was taken up for hearing on 25.06 .2026, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be posted und.er the caption "For Dismissal" to today.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr. Midde Arun Kumar, learned Standing counsel for GHMC appearing for the respondents is ready to proceed with the matter. However, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner though the matter is listed under the caption "For Dismissal". It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition.
3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any are pending, shall stand closed. SD/. C. DEEPIKA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /TRUE COPY/ e $ECTION OFFICER "[o,
1. One CC to SRI K. CHIDAMBARAM, Advocate [OPUC]
2. one cc to sRl tvllDDE ARUN KUMAR (SC FOR GHMC) IOPUC]
3. Two CD CoPies BN m_.o" v, /\
HIGH COURT DATED: 3010612026 WP.No.29769 of 2011 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION PROSECUTION E WITHOUT COSTS
0I JUt2U6 * k t €. 1 6 STAr o ci E!; o