Telangana High Court
WP/18015/2020 of R.Sridhar Vs Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited on 19 June 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 18015 OF 2020 Between: R.Sridhar, S/o.B Rama Krishna, Aged about 40
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION NO: 18015 OF 2020
Between:
R.Sridhar, S/o.B Rama Krishna, Aged about 40 years, Occ Vegetable Business, No 8-4-32519, Anand Nagar Erragolla, Hyderabad -500018.
...PETITIONER
AND
1. Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited, Rep by its Managing Director/Chairman, Metro
Rail Bhavan, Police Line Road, '19 Begumpet Road, Gunbazaar, Rasoolpura,
Meko Rail Limited, Meko Rail Bhavan, Police Line Road, 19 Begumpet Road,
Gunbazaar, Rasoolpura. Secunderabad 500 003
3. The State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation (MKT-|) Department,
4. The Agriculture Marketlng Committee, Bowenpally and Bharat Nagar, Rep. by
11-14-261, Vegetable Market, NTR Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad 500074
6. M.S Krishna Rao, S/o S. Narayana Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Political Activities Rl/o H.No. 5-3-43711, Shes Venkatraonagar Colony, Hyderabad 500
072 Email krishnaraomad hava illifig ma il. com
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, direction or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus under Article 226 of Constitution of lndia and directing Respondent No. 1
to grant a renewal lease of Stall No.1 1 in the space beneath the road over bridge at Sanath Nagar, Telangana at KM. 534.938 (Mile 811) ot NH No.65, Pune to Hyderabad Road measuring to a total area of 620 Sq.ft including common area without insisting on license from Respondent No. 4, as the present actions of the Respondent No. 1 in non-renewal of agreement without giving an opportunity to Petitioners is violative of Article 14, 19(g) and Article 2'1 of Constitution of lndia.
Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents No. 'l to 5 to produce all the documents entered into by the Hyderabad Metro Rail Ltd., and the Agriculture Market Committee.
l.A. NO: 2 OF 2020
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents rot to dispossess the Petitioner from Stall No.1 1 the space beneath the mod over bridge at Sanath Nagar, Telangana at KM.534.938 (Mile 8il) of NH
No.65, Pune to Hyderabad Road measuring to a total area of 620 Sq.ft including common area pending the disposal of the main Writ Petition.
Between:
S.K.Peerasahab, S/o SK Gouse Saheb, Aged about 61 years, Occ: Busines, R/o.H.No.7-2-150l'1, Ashok Colony, Sanathnagar, Hyde-500018
...PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.7
AND
R.Sridhar, S/o.R.Rama Krishna, Aged about 40 years, Occ Vegetable Business, R/o 8-4-32519, Anand Nagar Erragolla, Hyderabad -500018.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1
2. Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited, Rep by its Managing Director/Chairman, Metro
Rail Bhavan, Police Line Road, 19 Begumpet Road, Gunbazaar, Rasoolpura,
#r;:.Ewzrg
3. Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited, Rep by General Manager (Works), Hyderabad
Metro Rail Limited, Metro Rail Bhavan, Police Line Road, ',l9 Begumpet Road,
Gunbazaar, Rasoolpura. Secunderabad 500 003
4. The State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation (MKT-l) Department,
5. The Agriculture Marketing Committee, Bowenpally and Bharat Nagar, Rep. by
11-14-261, Vegetable Market, NTR Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad 500074
7. M.S Krishna Rao, S/o S. Narayana Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Political Activities Rl/o H.No. 5-343711, Shes Venkatraonagar Colony, Hyderabad 500
07 2 Email krishnaraomadhavaillifi gmail.com
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Section 16-A of Writ Rules 5.151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to implead the petitioner as respondent No.7 in the above writ petition.
Between:
S.K.Peerasahab, S/o SK Gouse Saheb, Aged about 61 years, Occ: Busines, R/o.H.No.7-2-15011, Ashok Colony, Sanathnagar, Hyde-500018
...PETITIONER/PROPOSED RESPONDENT NO.7
AND
R.Sridhar, S/o.R.Rama Krishna, Aged about 40 years, Occ Vegetable Business, R/o 84-325/9, Anand Nagar Erragolla, Hyderabad -500018.
...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.1
2. Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited, Rep by its Managing Director/Chairman, Metro
Rail Bhavan, Police Line Road, 19 Begumpet Road, Gunbazaar, Rasoolpura,
Metro Rail Limited, Metro Rail Bhavan, Police Line Road, 19 Begumpet Road,
Gunbazaar, Rasoolpura. Secunderabad 500 003
4. The State of Telangana, Agriculture and Cooperation (MKT-|) Department,
5. The Agriculture Marketing Committee, Bowenpally and Bharat Nagar, Rep. by
11-14-261 , Vegetable Market, NTR Nagar, L.B.Nagar, Hyderabad 500074
7. M S Krishna Rao, S/o S. Narayana Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Political Activities R/o H.No 5-3-43711, Shes Venkatraonagar Colony, Hyderabad 500
O72 Email krishnaraomad havaillifigmail. com
...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 6
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order in W P.No 18015 o'f 2020, dated 03.11.2020.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI R.SRIDHAR (Not Present)
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI P.RADHIVE REDDY
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2&3: SRI TEJASWINI MEREDDY, SC FOR HMRL
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.4&5: SRI N.UMA SHANKAR, SC FOR AMC
Counsel for the Respondent No.6: - - -
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABN)
THE HON'BLE SRI WSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
WRIT PETITION No.1 8O15 of2O2O
DATE: 19.0,6.2026
Between:
R.Sridhar
...Petitioner
AND
Hyderabad Metro Rail Limited
and others
...Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
When the matter was taken up for hearing earlier on Oa.O4.2026, learned' counsel for petitioner on record informed this Court that they have given up Vakalat and the matter was being adjourned from time to time' On 17 '06'2026' there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Accordingly, the matter was directed to be posted under the caption "For Dismissal" to todaY.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing' Mr.Tejaswini Mereddy, learned Standing Counsel for HMRL' for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 and Mr'N'Uma Shankar' learned tI- Sd/.M.OSMAN ALI BAIG ASSIS ANT REGISTRAR 1 SECTION OFFICER Standing Counsel for Agriculture Market Committee for respondenl Nos.4 and S are ready to proceed with the matter. However, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner though the matter is listed under the caption "For Dismissal,. Despite taking no objection Vakalat from the counsel, the petitione'r has not engaged any other counsel. It indicates that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the writ petition.
Acc ordt ngly, the Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneons petitions, if aly are pencting, shall stand closed //TRUE COPY// To, PMK '1 . One CC to SRI R.SRIDHAR, Advocate [OPUC]
2. One CC to SRI P.RADHIVE REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRI N.UMA SHANKAR, SC FOR AMC [OPUC] 4 One CC to SRI TEJASWINI MEREDDY, SC FOR HMR[. [OPUC]
5. Two CD Copies W
HIGH COURT DATED: 1910612026
ORDER
WP.No.18015 of 2020 o 23 JuN 2$28 C) e S{ATE o .L .ai,, + ,+ r':9 ril. t DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON. PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS b tufi 1b