Telangana High Court
CRP/1568/2026 of Dupati Gurvaiah Vs Dupati Ravi on 12 June 2026
222 of the constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High court may be pleased to direct the Trial court to expedite disposat of (otd os.No.24g ot 2o1g) os.No.158 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at
132571
Petition under Arricle 222 of the constitution of lndia, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High court may be pleased to direct the Trial court to expedite disposat of (otd os.No.24g ot 2o1g) os.No.158 of 2025 on the file of the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, at Miryalaguda.
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TEIEruCINN
AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND ru/ENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1568 OF 2026
.,.PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 5
Between:
AND
J
Dupati Gurvaiah, S/o. Late Laxmaiah, Aged about 73 years, Occ: Retd Employee, R/o. Rainipalem village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District.
Dupati Srinu, S/o. Gurvaiah, Aged about 50 years, Occ: Teacher, R/o.
Rainipalem village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District, presenfly residing at H.No 1'l-13-1200, Vasavi Colony, Near Astalaxmi Temple, Ramakrishnapurim, Ranga Reddy District.
Dupati Gowtham, S/o. Gurvaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ: pvt.Employee, R/o.
Rainipalem village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District, presenfly residing at H.No.1'1-13-1200, Vasavi Colony, Near Astalaxmi Temple, Ramakrishnapuram, Ranga Reddy District.
Dupati Praveen, S/o. Gurvaiah, Aged about 42 years, Occ: pvt.Employee, R/o.
Rainipalem village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District, presenily residing at H.No.1 1-13-1200, Vasavi Colony, Near Astalaxmi Temple, Ramakrishnapuram, Ranga Reddy District.
Dupati Venkateshwarlu, S/o. Late Laxmaiah, Aged about 62 years, Occ: Retd Employee, R/o. Flat. No. 202, Prajay Nivas, Block No.5, Mohan Nagar, Ranga Reddy District.
Dupati Ravi, S/o. Late Kanakaiah, Aged about 45 years, Occ: Agriculture & pvt.
Employee, R/o. Rainipalem Village, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda District.
2. Dupati -avanya, D/o Late Kanakaiah, Wo. Gottam prakash, Aged about 33
years, Ctcc: House hold, R/o. yathavakilla Village, Mattampally Mandal, Suryapet District. Pin. 508204
3. Dupati Govindamma, Wo. Late Kanakaiah, Aged about 62 years, Occ:
Agriculture, R/o Rainipatem Viilage, Miryalaguda Mandal, Nalgonda bistrict.
...RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS 1 TO 3
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri. Hari Kishan Kudikala Counsel for the Respondents: --- The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
a
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE JUWADISRIDEVI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1568 o12026
12 JUNE 2026
Between:
Dupati Gurvaiah and 4 others
Petitioners/Defenda nts 1 to 5
AND
Dupati Ravi and 2 others
Respondents/Plaintiffs 1 to 3
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
This civil revision petition is filed by the petitioners-defendants 1 to 5 seekrng to expedite disposal of O.S,No.158 of 2025 (old O.S.No.248 of 2019) pending on the file of the Senior Civil Judge at Miryalaguda (for short'trial Court')
During the course of hearing, Mr. Hari Kishan Kudikala, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the suit was originally instituted in the year, 2019 and is now renumbered as O.S.No 158 o'f 2025 (old OS No248 of 2019) on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, ttliryalaguda. Despite the lapse of nearly six years, the suit is still pending ad1udicatron tLst.e lrvlodtSidevt c.R.P.No_1s58oJ2026
lt is further submitted that the resoondents/plaintiffs, having obtained an ad-rnterim injunction, are deliberately dragging on the proceedirrgs without taking steos for earry disposar, thereby causing serious p-ejudice to the petitioners as the interini crder continues to operate against them
4. lt ir; further submitted that the Trial Court ought to have ensured erxpeditious disposar of the long-pending matter, especiaily when inte.im protection is already in force.
5. Learned counsel subrnits that the respondents are abusing the pendr:ncy of the suit and the inter-im order to harass the petitioners, and are not prosecuting the matter diligenfly. lt is also submitted that they have suppressed material facts and are not entitled to equitable relief ln tlrese circumstances, the learned counsel seeks a direction to the learned Senior Civil Judge, Miryalaguda, to expedite disposal of O.S, No 158 of 2025 (Otd O S No 248 of 2019).
ln v ew of the aforesaid submission, without going into the merits and demerits of the case, this civir Revision petition is disposed of, drrecting the trial Court to dispose of O.S. No. 15g of 2025 (Old OS No. 248 of 2019) as expeclitiously as possible.
lustice luwqdi S.idevi C.R.P.No.1558ol2025 preferably, within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt oF a copy of this order, in accordance with law. No costs Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed SD/. B.REKHA RANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER To PriKA Mv //TRUE COPY//
1. The Senior Civil Judge, at Miryalaguda.
2. One CC to Sri. Harl Kishan Kudikala, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATED: '12106t2026
ORDER
CRP.No.1568 of 202G DISPOSING OF THE CRP *n \ g J\}\\ lttt El o Or I s1ATE o ? x 1;;1:.,'i b \1 b 1'r