Telangana High Court
WA/2226/2004 of Syed Muquimuddin Ali, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, on 8 June 2026
THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE: W.A.No.2226 of 2004 PROCEEDINGS SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 26. 08.06.2026 PSK,J & NNR,J Counsel for the appellant : Ms. O. Aruna, learned counsel representing Mr. P. Amarender. Counsel for the respondent : Ms. K. Kalpana, learned Standing Counsel
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
MAIN CASE:
W.A.No.2226 of 2004
PROCEEDINGS SHEET
Sl.
No.
Date
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
OFFICE NOTE
26. 08.06.2026 PSK,J & NNR,J Counsel for the appellant : Ms. O. Aruna, learned counsel
representing Mr. P. Amarender.
Counsel for the respondent : Ms. K. Kalpana, learned
Standing Counsel for JNTU.
W.A.M.P.No.135 of 2011 Review Petition
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that, despite best efforts, the legal heirs of the appellant could not be contacted. Although she prays for a further adjournment, considering the substantive relief that could have been granted to the appellant or his legal heirs, and also taking note of the fact that the legal heirs of the appellant have not been contacted till date, we are not inclined to grant any further adjournment.
We are of the considered opinion that no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping this review petition pending any longer.
In the given circumstances, we are of the considered opinion that the review petition may, at Transferred to i/o folder, before corrections, if any.
this juncture, be closed for want of instructions from the appellant. However, in the event the legal heirs of the appellant approach this Court at a later stage and any genuine grievance still survives, it shall be open to them to move an appropriate application for revival of the review petition.
With the aforesaid observations, the present review petition stands closed. _______ PSK,J _______ NNR,J aqs