Telangana High Court
CRLP/7859/2026 of Bayya Roshalu alias Roshalu, Vs The State of T.G., on 4 June 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND T\ A /ENTY SIX EiFFFIIII THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO Bayya Roshalu @ Roshalu,, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 46 years, Occ. Farmer, Bayya Gangaiah, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 39 years,
t 3485I
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND T\A/ENTY SIX
EiFFFIIII
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
Bayya Roshalu @ Roshalu,, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 46 years, Occ. Farmer, Bayya Gangaiah, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 39 years, Occ. Farmer, Bayya Mallaiah, S/o. Lingaiah, Aged 37 years, Occ. Farmer, Mekala Krishnaiah, S/o. Papaiah, Aged 60 years, Occ. Shepard, All are R/o.Raghavapuram Village of Mothey Mandal, Suryapet District.
Petitionerc/Accused No.1 to 4
The State of T.G., Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court for the state of Telangana, Through P.S. Mothey, Suryapet District.
...RespondenUComplainant
Petition under Section 480 & 483 of BNSS praying that in the circumdtances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioners/Accused No.'1 to 4 on bail in the Cr.No.83/2026
and seeking Regular bail in punishable U/Sec 109 329 (3) 324(4), 118(1) r/w 3(5) of BNS.
This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Veera Babu Gandu, Advocate for the Petitioners and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.
The Court made the following: ORDER
{T
\
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE SRI SUDDALA CHALAPATHI RAO
CRIMINAL PETITION No.7859 of 2026
DATEz o,4.o6.2o.26
Between:
Bayya Roshalu and others
...Petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4
AND
The State of T.G.,
Rep. by its Public Prosecutor,
High Court for the State of Telangana,
Through P.S.Mothey,
Suryapet District
...Respondent
EFDER
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioners/accused Nos.l to 4 submitted that accused Nos.2 and 4, had filed a bail application before the trial Court and were enlarged on bail uide orders dated 29.05.2026.
2.
Apparently, while the present application was pending consideration before this Court, accused Nos.2
ard 4 had moved an application before the learned trial Court and obtained the said relief
3. tn that view of the matter, the present Criminal Petition is closed. However, accused Nos.1 and 3 are at liberty to file appropriate application before the learned trial Court seeking enlargement on bail.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
To,
//TRUE COPY//
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. The Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate At
2. The Superintendent, Sub Jail, Suryapet.
3. The Station House Otficer, Mothey Police
4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High SD/. HUSSAIN ALI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OFFICER Station, Suryapet District. Court of Telangana at HYderabad lourl
5. bne CC to SriVeera Babu Gandu, Advocate IOPUC]
6. Two CD Copies GNK A
HIGH COURT DATED: 0410612026 CIiIII=Ll CRLP.No.7859 of 2026 CLOSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION fi*
+5 1$E )TArE o }J crJ $ 5 l\]ll ?lt *
* Despal;:) @,,, olnlu