Telangana High Court
WP/16959/2026 of K.Ramesh Rao Vs The State of Telangana on 4 June 2026
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA wRlT PETITION NO: 16959 0F 2026 Between: K.Ramesh Rao, S/o Late K.Shesh Rao, aged about 85
[ 33001
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JUNE
TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
wRlT PETITION NO: 16959 0F 2026
Between:
K.Ramesh Rao, S/o Late K.Shesh Rao, aged about 85 years, Occ Agricu.lture'
Native of H.No.1O-5-423, Opp Old ll Town, P'S Thanagally, Niz mabad 5-03
0O'lPresentlyresidingat'H.ttto.t-a-ggB,StreetNol0,Chikaddpally'
Hyderabad
...PETITIONER
AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary' Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, Telangana State
2. The District Collector, Sangareddy District, Sangareddy, Telangana State
3. The Revenue Divisional officer, Zaheerabad Division, Sangareddy District, Telangana State.
4. The Tahsildar cum sub Registrar, Raikode Mandal, sangareddy District, Telangana State
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writofMANDAMUS,declaringtheinactionoftherespondentNos3and4'innot conducting any enquiry and also not following the previous court orders passed in favour of the petitioner herein in os No.63/2 of 't959 before the District court, Bidar in the year 1941 and os No.20l2010 on the file of Zaheerabad senior civil Judge court, dt.15.03.2018, is illegal, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-4 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to 4 to consider the petitioners applications dt.23.03.2018, 12.11.2025,25.04.2026 regarding the petitioners lands as a Successor of the agricultural dry lands in Sy.No.34/AA, 341E, 34lEE' 34/U total admeasuring Ac.22.00gts, and Sy.No.80 an extent of Ac.6.30gts, situated at Singitham Village, Raikode Mandal, Sangareddy Distrcit, Telangana State.
l.A. NO: 1OF 2026
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.4 to treat the registered Sale Deed Document No.79412026, d1.18.04.2026 as Null and Void by not allowing any kind of sale deeds by blocking the survey numbers of the petitioners lands in Sy.No.34/AA,341E,34lEE,34/U total admeasuring Ac.22.00gts, and Sy.No.80 an extent of Ac.6.30gts, situated at Singitham Village, Raikode Mandal, Sangareddy District, Telangana State, by not allowing any third parties into the lands by considering the petitioners representation dt.25.04.2026, till the disposal of the main writ petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VENKATA RAGHU MANNEPALLI
Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE
The Court made the following: ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELIINGANA
AT TTYDERABAI)
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGTSH BHEEMAPAI{A
WRIT PEIITION No. 1 6959 of 2026
o,4.06.2026
Between:
Mr.K.Ramesh Rao
AND
The State of Telangana,
Rep.by its Principal Secretary,
Revenue Department, Secretariat Buitding, Hyderabad ald others.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
...Petitioner ...Respondents This writ petition is filed seeking the following relief: "...to issue arl appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in tfre nature of writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the inaction of the respondent Nos.3 & 4, in not conducting any enquiry and also not following tJle previous court orders passed in favour of the petitioner herein in O.S.No.63/2 of 1959 before the District Court, Bidar in the year 1947 a:ld O.S.No.2O /2OlO on the file of Zaheerabad. Senior Civil Judge's Court, dt.15.O3.2O18, is illegai, arbitrary, against the principles of natural justice and violative of Article 1/1, 2l ald 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct ttre Respondent No.2 to 4 to consider the petitioner's applications dt.23.O3.2018, 12.11.2025, 25.04.2026 regarding the petitioner's lalds as a Successor of the agricultural dry lands in Sy.No.34/AA , 34 /8, 34 lEE, 34 /U total admeasuring Ac.22.00gts, and Sy.No.80 arr extent of Ac.6.30gts, situated at Singitham Village, Raikode Mandat, Sangareddy District, Telangana State and pass such other orders as may be deem fit ald proper in the circumstances of the case." )
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner filed writ petition aggrieved by the inaction of respondents in not conducting any enquiry and not following earlier orders passed in O.S.No.63/ 2 of 1959 before the District Court, Bidar in the year 1941 and O.S.No.20 /2OtO on the file oI Zaheerabad Senior Civil Judge,s court, dt. 15.o3.2o18, nou' he restricts his prayer seeking direction to respondent Nos.2 to 4 for disposal of his representation dated
25. O4.2026 in respect of his grievance.
4. In view of the same, without expressing any opinion on merits, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 25.04.2026, in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shari be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ petition, shall stand closed SD/- L.VIJAYA LAXMI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// a SECTION OFFICER To, 'l . The Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretariat Building, Hyderabad, Telangana State
2. The District Collector, Sangareddy District, Sangareddy, Telangana State
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Zaheerabad Division, Sangareddy District, Telangana State.
4. The Tahsildar cum sub Registrar, Raikode Mandar, sangareddy District, Telangana State
5. One CC to SRI VENKATA RAGHU MANNEPALL|, Advocate tOpUCl
6. Two CCs to Gp FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
7. Two CD Copies PMK D TKS
HIGH COURT DATED: 0410612026
ORDER
WP.No.16959 of 2026 DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS VACATION COURT (o 1 HESIa o 0I JlJil 2t6 z L,Ja I * o t cJPArcH n t oA